Hill v. Michigan, 176 L. Ed. 2d 378 (2010). · Go Syfert
Search
Hill v. Michigan, 176 L. Ed. 2d 378 (2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Branch v. Howard (ca10, 2012-01-03)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Branch v. Howard
10th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see also · confidence low
Under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), when a state court has “adjudicated a claim on the merits,” we may grant relief only if the state court’s decision “was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States” or “resulted in a decision that was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (d); see also Matthews v. Workman, 577 F.3d 1175, 1180 (10th Cir.2009), c…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Thomas Hill
v.
Michigan
No. 09-8669.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 22, 2010.
176 L. Ed. 2d 378
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Michigan denied.

Same case below, 485 Mich. 912, 773 N.W.2d 257.