Stoller v. United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, 178 L. Ed. 2d 144 (2010). · Go Syfert
Search
Stoller v. United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, 178 L. Ed. 2d 144 (2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 5× by 3 distinct cases · "Even if [the patentee] could establish the required nexus, a highly successful product alone would not overcome the strong showing of obviousness."
4 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Western Union Co. v. MoneyGram Payment Systems, Inc. (cafc, 2010-12-07)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Western Union Co. v. MoneyGram Payment Systems, Inc.
Fed. Cir. · 2010 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
even if could establish the required nexus, a highly successful product alone would not overcome the strong showing of obviousness.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Leo Stoller
v.
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Leo Stoller v. Google, Inc. Leo Stoller v. Pure Fishing, Inc. and Leo Stoller v. William T. Neary
No. 10-119.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 2010.
178 L. Ed. 2d 144
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 65%
Citer courts: Federal Circuit (1)

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.