Williams v. Hobbs, 178 L. Ed. 2d 179 (2010).

Williams v. Hobbs, 178 L. Ed. 2d 179 (2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

green Positive treatment 8.1 score

33 citation events (33 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.

Strongest positive: United States v. William Graham (ca4, 2013-03-29)

Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of

2010 2018 2026

Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗

cited Cited "see" United States v. William Graham

4th Cir. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. Green, 599 F.3d 360, 369 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 271 , 178 L.Ed.2d 179 (2010).

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Daniel Alston

4th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. Green, 599 F.3d 360, 376 (4th Cir.) (explaining that plain view doctrine allows warrantless seizure of evidence when officer lawfully is in the area in which he sees the object, has lawful access to the object, and the incriminating nature of the object is apparent), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 271 , 178 L.Ed.2d 179 (2010).

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Michael Stevenson

4th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. Green, 599 F.3d 360, 367 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 271 , 178 L.Ed.2d 179 (2010). “[V]iewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Government,” United States v. Bynum, 604 F.3d 161, 166 (4th Cir.) (internal quotation marks omitted), ce rt. denied, — U.S.-, 130 S.Ct. 3442 , 177 L.Ed.2d 347 (2010), the court is to determine whether the conviction is supported by “substantial evidence,” where “substantial evidence is evidence that a reasonable finder of fact could accept as adequate and sufficient to support a conclusion of a defenda…

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Bobby Thompson

4th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high

United States v. Kelly, 510 F.3d 433, 440 (4th Cir.2007); see United States v. Green, 599 F.3d 360, 367 (4th Cir.) (stating standard of review for denial of Fed.R.Crim.P. 29 motion), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 271 , 178 L.Ed.2d 179 (2010).

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Michael Stevenson

4th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. Green, 599 F.3d 360, 367 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 271 , 178 L.Ed.2d 179 (2010). “[Vjiewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Government,” United States v. Bynum, 604 F.3d 161, 166 (4th Cir.) (internal quotation marks omitted), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3442 , 177 L.Ed.2d 347 (2010), the court is to determine whether the conviction is supported by “substantial evidence,” where “substantial evidence is evidence that a reasonable finder of fact could accept as adequate and sufficient to support a conclusion of a defend…

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Thornburgh

10th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. Green, 599 F.3d 360, 372 (4th Cir.) ("We are mindful that ... a money laundering conspiracy does not require proof of an overt act.”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 271 , 178 L.Ed.2d 179 (2010), and Boyd v. United States, - U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 340 , 178 L.Ed.2d 221 (2010).

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Hickman

4th Cir. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. Green, 599 F.3d 360, 367 (4th Cir.2010), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 271 , 340, 178 L.Ed.2d 179 (2010). “[V]iewing the evi *763 dence in the light most favorable to the Government,” United, States v. Bynum, 604 F.3d 161, 166 (4th Cir.) (internal quotation marks omitted), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 130 S.Ct. 3442 , 177 L.Ed.2d 347 (2010), we are to determine whether the conviction is supported by “substantial evidence,” where “substantial evidence is evidence that a reasonable finder of fact could accept as adequate and sufficient to support a conclusion of a…