Lewis v. Holder, 178 L. Ed. 2d 22 (2010). · Go Syfert
Lewis v. Holder, 178 L. Ed. 2d 22 (2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“municipality is almost never liable for an isolated unconstitutional act on the part of an employee”
27 citation events (27 in the last 25 years) across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Morris v. Dallas County (txnd, 2013-06-18)
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010 2018 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Morris v. Dallas County
N.D. Tex. · 2013 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
municipality is almost never liable for an isolated unconstitutional act on the part of an employee
cited Cited "see" Thomas v. State
N.D. Tex. · 2018 · signal: accord · confidence high
Piotrowski , 237 F.3d at 579-80 & n.22 ; accord Peterson v. City of Fort Worth , 588 F.3d 838 , 849-50 (5th Cir. 2009), cert. denied , 562 U.S. 827 , 131 S.Ct. 66 , 178 L.Ed.2d 22 (2010).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Veronica Okon v. Harris County Hospital Dist
5th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
Thus, the Supreme Court has held that a city would not “automatically be liable under § 1983 if one of its employees happened to apply the policy in an unconstitutional manner, for liability would then rest on respondeat superior." City of Canton v. Harris, 489 U.S. 378, 387 , 109 S.Ct. 1197 , 103 L.Ed.2d 412 (1989); see also Bolton v. City of Dallas, 541 F.3d 545, 549 (5th Cir.2008) ("When an official’s discretionary decisions are constrained by policies not of that official’s making, those policies, rather than the decision-maker’s departure from them, are the act of the municipalit…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Elvis David Lewis
v.
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General
No. 09-913.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 2010.
178 L. Ed. 2d 22

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 325 Fed. Appx. 178.