green
Positive treatment
3.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 2011 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2011
2018
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Simmons, Jr. v. Wiles
See Scarborough v. Dillards, Inc., 363 N.C. 715, 722-23 , 693 S.E.2d 640, 644-45 (2009), cert. denied, 563 U.S. 988 , 131 S. Ct. 2456 , 179 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Many Cultures, One Message v. Jim Clements
To determine whether a party has sufficient injury to support Article III standing in the First Amendment context, we look to “whether the plaintiffs have articulated a ‘concrete plan’ to violate the law in question, whether the prosecuting authorities have communicated a specific warning or threat to initiate proceedings, and the history of past prosecution or enforcement under the challenged statute.” Thomas v. Anchorage Equal Rights Comm’n, 220 F.3d 1134 , 1139 (9th Cir.2000) (en bane); see also Canatella v. California, 304 F.3d 843 , 854 n. 14 (9th Cir.2002) (looking to a party�…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Andrew Chien
v.
Skystar Bio Pharmaceutical Company
v.
Skystar Bio Pharmaceutical Company
No. 10-1134.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 16, 2011.
179 L. Ed. 2d 1211
Published
Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Same case below, 378 Fed. Appx. 109.