green
Positive treatment
7.7 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Robert Lee Hong v. Secretary Dept. of Corrections
An unreasonable application of federal law occurs when the state court identifies the correct governing legal rule, but “unreasonably applies that principle to the facts of the prisoner’s case.” Cox v. McNeil, 638 F.3d 1356, 1360 (11th Cir.) (quotations omitted), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 309 , 181 L.Ed.2d 189 *650 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jones v. Murphy
See Stenhouse v. Hobbs, 631 F.3d 888, 894-95 (8th Cir.2011) ("Our court has not directly addressed whether, if the reasoning of the state appellate court cannot pass muster under AEDPA, the rationale of the state trial court also merits deference under § 2254(d).”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 308 , 181 L.Ed.2d 189 (2011).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lilian Galvan
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 11-5418.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 2011.
181 L. Ed. 2d 189
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Same case below, 408 Fed. Appx. 224.