Lanzon v. United States, 181 L. Ed. 2d 208 (2011). · Go Syfert
Search
Lanzon v. United States, 181 L. Ed. 2d 208 (2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Rivera (conn, 2022-06-21)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Rivera (2×)
Conn. · 2022 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Lanzon, 639 F.3d 1293 , 1301–1302 (11th Cir.) (concluding that ‘‘transcripts were admissi- ble under [rule 1004 of the Federal Rules of Evidence] because they contain evidence of the conversations and the originals were not destroyed in bad faith’’), cert. denied, 565 U.S. 916 , 132 S. Ct. 333 , 181 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Rachel Ruiz
11th Cir. · 2013 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Caldwell, 776 F.2d at 1001-02 ; see also United States v. Lanzon, 639 F.3d 1293, 1301 (11th Cir.2011) (stating that a district court’s “discretion to determine authenticity ... should not be disturbed on appeal absent a showing that there is no competent evidence in the record to support it” (quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 333 , 181 L.Ed.2d 208 (2011).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Keith Joseph Lanzon
v.
United States
No. 11-5608.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 2011.
181 L. Ed. 2d 208
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 639 F.3d 1293.