Waymer v. Bodison, 181 L. Ed. 2d 558 (2011). · Go Syfert
Search
Waymer v. Bodison, 181 L. Ed. 2d 558 (2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“we ordinarily review sentences for procedural error and for substantive reasonableness, applying an abuse of discretion standard.”
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: United States v. Walter Teel (ca5, 2012-08-15)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Walter Teel
5th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
we ordinarily review sentences for procedural error and for substantive reasonableness, applying an abuse of discretion standard.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Troy Waymer
v.
McKither Bodison, Warden
No. 11-7122.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 12, 2011.
181 L. Ed. 2d 558
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 67%
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (1)

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 445 Fed. Appx. 703.