Media Gen., Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 567 U.S. 951 (2012). · Go Syfert
Search
Media Gen., Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 567 U.S. 951 (2012). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Thigpen v. Cooper (ncctapp, 2013-03-05)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Thigpen v. Cooper
N.C. Ct. App. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See 281 Care Comm. v. Arneson, 638 F.3d 621, 632 (8th Cir. 2011) (holding, while applying the Verizon Maryland test, that because there was no dispute plaintiffs sought prospective relief, “[t]he only question is whether they have alleged that [the] defendant [Attorney General] is, herself, engaged in an ongoing violation of federal law”), cert. review denied,_U.S._, 183 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hotze v. Sebelius
S.D. Tex. · 2014 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Thomas More Law Center v. Obama, 651 F.3d 529, 537-38 (6th Cir.2011), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 61 , 183 L.Ed.2d 710 (2012), and abrogated on other grounds by NFIB, 132 S.Ct. 2566 (2012) (finding Article III ripeness because the case concerned a “pre-enforcement facial challenge” to the individual mandate and the fact that “[b]y permitting this lawsuit to be filed three and one-half years before the effective date ... the only thing that changes is that all three layers of the federal judiciary will be able to reach considered merits decisions ... before the law take…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Media General, Inc.
v.
Federal Communications Commission Tribune Co. v. Federal Communications Commission and National Association of Broadcasters v. Federal Communications Commission
No. 11-691; No. 11-696; No. 11-698.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 29, 2012.
567 U.S. 951
Published

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 652 F. 3d 431.