green
Positive treatment
10.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 2013 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2013
2019
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Astorga v. Leavenworth County Sheriff
(2×)
See State v. Astorga, 295 Kan. 339 , 284 P.3d 279 (2012), cert. granted, judgment vacated, 570 U.S. 913 , 133 S. Ct. 2877 , 186 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Noyce v. State
See 570 U.S. at 913, 133 S.Ct. 2877 (remanding hard 50 sentencing case to this court for further consideration in light of Alleyne ).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Diaz
(2×)
In light of these notifications, “it was no longer reasonable for [the defendant] to presume an expectation of privacy as to the content of those telephone conversations” (United States v Busch, 2013 US Dist LEXIS 188419 , *165 [WD NY, July 15, 2013, No. 09CR331A]; see United States v Shavers, 693 F3d 363, 389-390 [3d Cir 2012], vacated and remanded on other grounds 570 US —, 133 S Ct 2877 [2013]).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Jermel Lewis
(3×)
See Shavers v. United States, 133 S. Ct. 2877 (2013).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Geoffrey Gaffney
See United States v. Mubdi, 691 F.3d 334, 341 (4th Cir.2012), vacated on other grounds, — U.S.-, 133 S.Ct. 2851 , 186 L.Ed.2d 902 (2013) (finding officers’ visual estimates were sufficient to support probable cause because the two officers gave virtually identical estimates and were required, as part of a radar certification class, to visually estimate the speed of vehicles within a narrow margin of error); United States v. Ludwig, 641 F.3d 1243, 1247 (10th Cir.2011) (crediting an officer’s visual estimation of speed to determine whether probable cause to stop existed partially because t…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Soto
See State v. Astorga, 295 Kan. 339, 354 , 284 P.3d 279 (2012), (“We have consistently upheld the constitutionality of the hard 40/hard 50 sentencing scheme in light of both Ring and Apprendi , and we decline Astorga’s invitation to reconsider our prior decisions.”), cert. granted, judgment vacated by Astorga v. Kansas, 133 S. Ct. 2877 (2013); State v. McCaslin, 291 Kan. 697, 729-30 , 245 P.3d 1030 (2011) (citing cases); State v Albright, 283 Kan. 418, 423-24 , 153 P.3d 497 (2007) (same); see also Johnson, 284 Kan. at 23 (upholding constitutionality of hard 50 scheme after noting McMillan…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Glorious SHAVERS, aka G, aka G-Bucks, aka Julious Colzie, aka Glorious Grand, Jermel Lewis, aka STAR, aka PR-STAR, aka P, and Andrew White
v.
UNITED STATES.
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 12–7525..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 24, 2013.
Cited by 12 opinions | Published
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit for further consideration in light of Alleyne v. United States, --- U.S. ----, 133 S.Ct. 2151, --- L.Ed. ---- (2013).