Merck & Co. v. La. Wholesale Drug Co., 570 U.S. 913 (2013). · Go Syfert
Search
Merck & Co. v. La. Wholesale Drug Co., 570 U.S. 913 (2013). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“a plaintiff suffers an antitrust injury where it is overcharged for a product, regardless of whether it can show lost profits”
19 citation events (19 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: King Drug Co. of Florence, Inc. v. Cephalon, Inc. (paed, 2015-07-27)
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) King Drug Co. of Florence, Inc. v. Cephalon, Inc.
E.D. Pa. · 2015 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
a plaintiff suffers an antitrust injury where it is overcharged for a product, regardless of whether it can show lost profits
discussed Cited "see" State v. Ricci
Ariz. Ct. App. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Shavers, 693 F.3d 363, 387 (3rd Cir. 2012) (holding that when officers placed defendants and witness together in a holding cell for transport to the court, the failure to ensure that they were not separated resulted in an impermissibly suggestive pretrial identification procedure), vacated on other grounds, 570 U.S. 913 (2013).
cited Cited "see" Astorga v. Leavenworth County Sheriff
Kan. Ct. App. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Astorga, 295 Kan. 339 , 284 P.3d 279 (2012), cert. granted, judgment vacated, 570 U.S. 913 , 133 S. Ct. 2877 , 186 L.
discussed Cited "see" Tina Jimerson v. Dexter Payne
8th Cir. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Davis, 690 F.3d 912, 925 (8th Cir. 2012), vacated on other grounds by 570 U.S. 913 (2013) (noting an adverse instruction for spoliation in a criminal case may be warranted if the evidence establishes an inference that the police acted improperly by destroying evidence); United States v. Houston, 548 F.3d 1151, 1155 (8th Cir. 2008) (addressing argument requesting an adverse credibility finding against the government for failing to preserve a video); United States v. Iron Eyes, 367 F.3d 781 , 786–87 (8th Cir. 2004) (analyzing claim that an adverse inference instruction was…
cited Cited "see" Noyce v. State
Kan. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See 570 U.S. at 913, 133 S.Ct. 2877 (remanding hard 50 sentencing case to this court for further consideration in light of Alleyne ).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Sharmake Abdullahi (2×)
8th Cir. · 2025 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id. at 445 ; see also United States v. Shavers, 693 F.3d 363, 379-81 (3d Cir. 2012), vacated on other grounds by Shavers v. United States, 570 U.S. 913 (2013) (reversing § 1512(b)(1) conviction where Government did not prove defendants “contemplated any other proceeding” besides pending state charges); United States v. Sutton, 30 F.4th 981 , 985 (10th Cir. 2022) (same).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
MERCK & CO., INC.
v.
LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG COMPANY, INC.
No. 12–245..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 24, 2013.
570 U.S. 913
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit for further consideration in light of FTC v. Actavis, Inc., ---U.S. ----, 133 S.Ct. 2223, --- L.Ed. ---- (2013).
Consideration, Took.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 74%
Citer courts: E.D. Pennsylvania (1)
Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.