green
Positive treatment
8.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 2014 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2014
2020
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Georgescu
Although Defendant is correct that § 1114 does not include an express provision for extraterritorial application, and that there is a “legal presumption that Congress ordinarily intends its statutes to have domestic, not extraterritorial, application,” Small v. United States, 544 U.S. 385, 388-89 , 125 S.Ct. 1752 , 161 L.Ed.2d 651 (2005), such presumption does not apply “where the law at issue is aimed at protecting the right of the government to defend itself,” United States v. Vilar, 729 F.3d 62, 73 (2d Cir.2013), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 134 S,Ct. 2684, 189 L.Ed.2d 230 (2014) (q…
cited
Cited "see"
Com. v. Neal, A.
See Commonwealth v. Yohe, 79 A.3d 520, 530 (Pa. 2013), cert. denied, 134 S. Ct. 2662 (2014).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Norton
See Commonwealth v. Yoke, 621 Pa. 527 , 79 A.3d 520, 537 (2013), cert, denied,-U.S.-, 134 S.Ct. 2662 , 189 L.Ed.2d 209 (2014) ("As explained below, we view the Toxicology Report at issue in this case as similar to the scientific reports in Melendez-Diaz [ 1 and Bullcoming , and, guided by these opinions, hold that it is likewise testimonial.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Norton
See Commonwealth v. Yohe, 79 A.3d 520, 537 (Pa. 2013), cert. denied, __ U.S. __, 134 S.Ct. 2662 , 189 L.Ed.2d 209 (2014) (“As explained below, we view the Toxicology Report at issue in this case as similar to the scientific reports in Melendez–Diaz [] and Bullcoming, and, guided by these opinions, hold that it is likewise testimonial.
cited
Cited "see"
Com. v. Briggs, C.
See Commonwealth v. Yohe, 39 A.3d 381 (Pa. Super. 2012), aff’d, 79 A.3d 520 (Pa. 2013), cert. denied, 134 S. Ct. 2662 (U.S. 2014).
cited
Cited "see"
Tymoshenko v. Firtash
See United States v. Vilar, 729 F.3d 62 , 91 n. 26 (2d Cir.2013), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 2684 , 189 L.Ed.2d 230 (2014).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. New York City Department of Education
See generally Lynch v. City of New York, 737 F.3d 150, 156 (2d Cir.2013) (discussing standard of review on summary judgment generally), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 2664 , 189 L.Ed.2d 230 , 2014 WL 1052398 (May 27, 2014); Dickerson v. Napolitano, 604 F.3d 732, 740 (2d Cir.2010) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Walker
See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Yohe , 621 Pa. 527 , 561, 79 A.3d 520 (2013) (testifying expert's analysis "did not simply parrot another analyst ... rather, he was involved with reviewing all of the raw testing data, evaluating the results, measuring them against lab protocols to determine if the results supported each other, and writing and signing the report" [citation omitted] ), cert. denied, 572 U.S. 1135 , 134 S. Ct. 2662 , 189 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Skakel v. Commissioner of Correction
See, e.g., United States v. Vilar, 729 F.3d 62, 85 (2d Cir. 2013), cert. denied, U.S. , 134 S. Ct. 2684 , 189 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Skakel v. Comm'r of Corr.
See, e.g., United States v. Vilar , 729 F.3d 62 , 85 (2d Cir. 2013), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 134 S.Ct. 2684 , 189 L.Ed.2d 230 (2014).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
OKLAHOMA
v.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
v.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
No. 13–921..
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 27, 2014.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Consideration, Took.
Published
Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.