green
Positive treatment
6.4 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Stine
(2×)
See United States v. Margheim, 770 F.3d 1312, 1321-22 (10th Cir. 2014), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 1514 , 191 L.Ed.2d 448 (2015) (using same method to determine whether violation of the Act occurred).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Vaughan
(2×)
See United States v. Margheim, 770 F.3d 1312, 1330 (10th Cir.2014) (no showing of prejudice when defendant failed to demonstrate that “the so-called missing witness’s testimony was vital to [the] defense”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 1514 , 191 L.Ed.2d 448 (2015); Jackson, 390 F.3d at 1265 (“In arguing that the unavailability of a witness impaired the defense, a defendant must state with particularity what exculpatory testimony would have been offered .,. [and] present evidence that the delay caused the witness’s unavailability.” (brackets and internal quotation marks omit…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kenneth DODD, aka K
v.
UNITED STATES.
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 14–8195..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 2, 2015.
135 S. Ct. 1514
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.