green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
23.0 score
“here a party fails to preserve claims of error in the court below ... review is for plain error.”
Treatment trajectory · 2016 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2016
2021
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Torres-Figueroa
here a party fails to preserve claims of error in the court below ... review is for plain error.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cueto-Nunez
See United States v. Ruiz-Huertas, 792 F.3d 223, 226 (1st Cir.) (citing United States v. Flores-Machicote, 706 F.3d 16, 20 (1st Cir. 2013)(noting .that courts of appeals’ evaluation of a sentencing court’s “judgment calls for abiise of discretion”), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 136 S. Ct. 258 , 193 L.Ed.2d 191 (2015)); United States v. Shand, 739 F.3d 714, 716 (2d Cir. 2014) (holding that § 5K3.1 “vests sole discretion to grant departures on Government motions with district court judges.”).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Angiolillo
See United States v. Ruiz-Huertas, 792 F.3d 223, 228 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 136 S.Ct. 258 , 193 L.Ed.2d 191 (2015).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Márquez-García
See United States v. Ruiz-Huertas, 792 F.3d 223, 226 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 258 , 193 L.Ed.2d 191 (2015).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Soto-Soto
See United States v. Ruiz-Huertas, 792 F.3d 223, 226 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 136 S.Ct. 258 , 193 L.Ed.2d 191 (2015).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hill
See United States v. Ruiz-Huertas, 792 F.3d 223 , 228 & n.4 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 136 S.Ct. 258 , 193 L.Ed.2d 191 (2015).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Román-Díaz
See United States v. Ruiz-Huertas, 792 F.3d 223, 226 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 258 , 193 L.Ed.2d 191 (2015).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Nuñez
See United States v. Ruiz-Huertas, 792 F.3d 223, 226 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 136 S.Ct. 258 , 193 L.Ed.2d 191 (2015); United States v. Martin, 520 F.3d 87, 92 (1st Cir. 2008).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wooldridge
See United States v. Ruiz-Huertas, 792 F.3d 223, 228 (1st Cir.) (noting uncertainty with respect to standard of review regarding unpreserved claims of substantive unreasonableness), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 258 , 193 L.Ed.2d 191 (2015).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Nuñez
See United States v. Ruiz-Huertas, 792 F.3d 223 , 228 & n.4 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 258 , 193 L.Ed.2d 191 (2015).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Marino
See United States v. Ruiz-Huertas, 792 F.3d 223 , 228 & n. 4 (1st Cir.) (taking that approach in a similar case after noting the uncertainly surrounding whether a substantive-reasonableness claim must be preserved below), cert. denied,-U.S., 136 S.Ct. 258 , 258-59, 193 L.Ed.2d 191 (2015). 7 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Vázquez-Méndez
See United States v. Ruiz-Huertas, 792 F.3d 223, 226 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 136 S.Ct. 258 , 193 L.Ed.2d 191 (2015).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bermúdez-Meléndez
See United States v. Ruiz-Huertas, 792 F.3d 223, 228 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 136 S.Ct. 258 , 193 L.Ed.2d 191 (2015).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Pérez
Though the court’s explanation need not “be precise to the point of pedantry,” United States v. Turbides-Leonardo, 468 F.3d 34, 40 (1st Cir.2006), the explanation given should “identify the [relevant] factors driving [the sentencing] determination.” United States v. Sepúlveda-Hernández, 817 F.3d 30, 33 (1st Cir.2016) [No. 15-1293, 2016 WL 1042979 ]; see United States v. Ruiz-Huertas, 792 F.3d 223, 226-27 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 136 S.Ct. 258 , 258-59, 193 L.Ed.2d 191 (2015).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Montero-Montero
See United States v. Ruiz-Huertas, 792 F.3d 223, 227 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 258 , 193 L.Ed.2d 191 (2015); United States v. Ocasio-Cancel, 727 F.3d 85, 91 (1st Cir.2013).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Santos-Rivera
See, e.g., United States v. Ruiz-Huertas, 792 F.3d 223, 228 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 136 S.Ct. 258 , 193 L.Ed.2d 191 (2015).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Luis SANTILLAN
v.
UNITED STATES.
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 15–5536..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 2015.
136 S. Ct. 258
Published
Citer courts: First Circuit (1)
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.