green
Positive treatment
20.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 2016 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2016
2021
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In Re: William Hunt
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
The “clearest example” the Court pointed out, was its prior decision in Bousley, which held a new rule to be retroactive “even though Congress could (and later did) reverse [the rule announced in] Bailey by amending the statute.” Welch, 136 S. Ct. at 1267 (emphasis added); see supra note 3.
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
In Re: William Hunt
(5×)
also: Cited "see"
The “clearest example” the Court pointed out, was its prior decision in Bousley, which held a new rule to be retroactive “even though Congress could -(and later did) reverse [the rule announced in] Bailey by amending the statute.” Welch, 136 S.Ct. at 1267 (emphasis added); see supra note 3.
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
In re: Charles Therion Clayton
(4×)
also: Cited "see"
The “clearest example” the Court pointed out, was its prior decision in Bousley, which held a new rule to be retroactive “even though Congress could (and later did) reverse [the rule announced in] Bailey by amending the statute.” Welch, 136 S.Ct. at 1267 (emphasis added); see supra note 3.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ernest D. Suggs v. State of Florida
(2×)
See Bolin v. State , 184 So.3d 492 , 500-01 (Fla. 2015) (holding that Malone's contamination of evidence in a separate case was not relevant in a case where Malone had the limited *707 role of receiving evidence, checking for hair and fibers, and forwarding the evidence to other examiners and did not testify), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 790 , 193 L.Ed.2d 534 (2016) ; Rhodes v. State , 986 So.2d 501 , 506-08 (Fla. 2008) (finding a lack of Brady materiality in the revelation that Malone falsely testified that hairs in the victim's hand belonged to the victim, where postconviction te…
discussed
Cited "see"
In re: Charles Therion Clayton
See Welch v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 790 (2016) (granting petition for certiorari). 4 In Welch, the Supreme Court told us that we were wrong to hold that the rule announced in Johnson did not apply retroactively. 136 S. Ct. 1257, 1268 (2016). 4 As Judge Martin explains in her concurrence, we were the only Circuit in the nation to have routinely refused to hold in abeyance inmates’ applications pending the Welch retroactivity decision. 41 Case: 16-14556 Date Filed: 07/18/2016 Page: 42 of 49 Welch was a case from our Circuit.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bostock v. Clayton Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rs
(2×)
See , e.g. , In re Anthony Johnson , 815 F.3d 733 (11th Cir. 2016) (vacating panel order and ordering en banc rehearing where panel had held in abeyance petitioner's application to file second or successive § 2255 motion pending the Supreme Court's impending determination in Welch v. United States , --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 790 , 193 L.Ed.2d 534 (2016), of whether the new rule announced by the Supreme Court in Johnson v. United States , --- U.S. ----, 135 S.Ct. 2551 , 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015), was retroactively applicable).
Gregory WELCH
v.
UNITED STATES.
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 15–6418..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 8, 2016.
136 S. Ct. 790
Cited by 10 opinions | Published
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted.