In re Windsor, 137 S. Ct. 614 (2016). · Go Syfert
Search
In re Windsor, 137 S. Ct. 614 (2016). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC v. TC Heartland, LLC (ded, 2017-01-12)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC v. TC Heartland, LLC
D. Del. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See — U.S. —, 137 S.Ct. 614 , 196 L.Ed.2d 490 , 2016 WL 4944616 (2016).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Philip Swaby
4th Cir. · 2017 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Lee v. United States, 825 F.3d 311, 313-14 (6th Cir. 2016) (describing, in examining Strickland’s prejudice prong, circuit split on whether immigrant-defendant’s desire to throw a “Hail Mary,” like a hope for jury nullification, at trial in hopes of avoiding deportation is a rational decision that amounts to prejudice), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 614 , 196 L.Ed.2d 490 (2016). 6 Therefore, Ward’s deficient performance prejudiced Swaby’s defense because there was a reasonable likelihood he would have gone to trial.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." People v. Sifuentes
Colo. Ct. App. · 2017 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Morones-Quinonez, ¶ 13; People v. Kazadi, 284 P.3d 70, 74 (Colo. App. 2011), aff’d, 2012 CO 73 ; see also Lee v. United States, 825 F.3d 311, 316 (6th Cir.), cert. granted 580 U.S. __ , 137 S. Ct. 614 (2016); DeBartolo v. United States, 790 F.3d 775, 779-80 (7th Cir. 2015); United States v. Orocio, 645 F.3d 630, 644-45 (3d Cir. 2011), abrogated on other grounds by Chaidez v. United States, 568 U.S. ___ , 133 S. Ct. 1103 (2013); Sasonov v. United States, 575 F. Supp. 2d 626, 636-38 (D.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re William M. WINDSOR
No. 16–6369 (R46–003)..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 20, 2016.
137 S. Ct. 614
Published

The petition for writ of mandamus and the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis were dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46.2 of the Rules of this Court.