green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
21.8 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case ·
…because power had implied authorization to access facebook's computers, it did not, at first, violate the statute.
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, 2019–2022 ·
…violation of the terms of use of a website-without more- cannot establish liability under the cfaa.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 2018 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2018
2022
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Hiq Labs, Inc. v. Linkedin Corporation
violation of the terms of use of a website-without more- cannot establish liability under the cfaa.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Hiq Labs, Inc. v. Linkedin Corporation
violation of the terms of use of a website-without more- cannot establish liability under the cfaa.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Authenticom, Inc. v. CDK Global, LLC (In re Dealer Mgmt. Sys. Antitrust Litig.)
(2×)
because power had implied authorization to access facebook's computers, it did not, at first, violate the statute.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Silver v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency
ConAgra Brands, Inc. v. Briseno, 138 S. Ct. 313 , 199 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State Of Washington, V Carmen Copeland
See State v. Trey M., 186 Wn.2d 884, 889, 907 , 383 P.3d 474 (2016), cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 313 (2017).
cited
Cited "see"
Stokes v. Sensa Products
See Briseno v. ConAgra Foods, 17 Inc., 844 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 313 (2017).
discussed
Cited "see"
Valadez v. CSX Intermodal Terminals, Inc.
(2×)
See Briseno v. ConAgra Foods, Inc. , 844 F.3d 1121 , 1131 (9th Cir.), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 313 , 199 L.Ed.2d 206 (2017).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re: Dealer Management Systems Antitrust Litigation
If I have an account with AOL, * * * to get access to AOL’s system, you need AOL’s permission, not my permission.”); see also Facebook, Inc., 844 F.3d at 1067 , cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 313 (2017) (finding unauthorized use where permission expressly was rescinded in a written cease and desist order).]6 Although dealers might have a breach of contract claim against CDK if CDK’s denial of authority violated its contract with the dealers, that does not change the fact that CDK denied Authenticom authority.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Authenticom, Inc. v. CDK Global, Inc. (In re Dealer Mgmt. Sys. Antitrust Litig.)
(2×)
If I have an account with AOL, * * * to get access to AOL's system, you need AOL's permission, not my permission."); see also Facebook, Inc. , 844 F.3d at 1067 , cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 313 , 199 L.Ed.2d 206 (2017) (finding unauthorized use where permission expressly was rescinded in a written cease and desist order).] 6 Although dealers might have a breach of contract claim against CDK if CDK's denial of authority violated its contract with the dealers, that does not change the fact that CDK denied Authenticom authority.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sandvig v. Sessions
(2×)
Compare Facebook, Inc. v. Power Ventures, Inc. , 844 F.3d 1058 , 1067 (9th Cir. 2016) ("[A] violation of the terms of use of a website-without more-cannot establish liability under the CFAA."), cert. denied --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 313 , 199 L.Ed.2d 206 (2017) (mem.); Valle , 807 F.3d at 528 (rejecting unauthorized use reading of "exceeds authorized access" because "the government's interpretation of 'exceeds authorized access' makes every violation of a private computer use policy a federal crime"); WEC Carolina , 687 F.3d at 206 (noting that the unauthorized use reading "would impute liabili…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
POWER VENTURES, INC.
v.
FACEBOOK, INC.
v.
FACEBOOK, INC.
No. 16–1105..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 2017.
Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (2) · E.D. Illinois (2)
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.