Cluster 9334528
green
· 41 citation events
across 16 courts.
Showing the 10 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
green
Hiq Labs, Inc. v. Linkedin Corporation (2022)
Compare Facebook, Inc. v. Power Ventures, Inc., 844 F.3d 1058, 1067 (9th Cir. 2016), cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 313 (2017) (“[A] violation of the terms of use of a website—without more— cannot establish liability under the CFAA.”); Nosal I, 676 F.3d at 862 (“We remain unpersuaded by the decisions of our sister circuits that interpret the CFAA broadly to cover violations of corporate computer use restrictions or violations of a duty of loyalty.”), with EF Cultural Travel BV v. …
“[A] violation of the terms of use of a website—without more— cannot establish liability under the CFAA.”
green
Hiq Labs, Inc. v. Linkedin Corporation (2019)
Compare Facebook, Inc. v. Power Ventures, Inc., 844 F.3d 1058, 1067 (9th Cir. 2016), cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 313 (2017) (“[A] violation of the terms of use of a website—without more— cannot establish liability under the CFAA.”); Nosal I, 676 F.3d at 862 (“We remain unpersuaded by the decisions of our sister circuits that interpret the CFAA broadly to cover violations of corporate computer use restrictions or violations of a duty of loyalty.”), with EF Cultural Travel BV v. …
“[A] violation of the terms of use of a website—without more— cannot establish liability under the CFAA.”
See Facebook, Inc. v. Power Ventures, Inc. , 844 F.3d 1058 , 1069 (9th Cir. 2016), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 313 , 199 L.Ed.2d 206 (2017) ("Because Power had implied authorization to access Facebook's computers, it did not, at first, violate the statute.") (emphasis added).
"Because Power had implied authorization to access Facebook's computers, it did not, at first, violate the statute."
ConAgra Brands, Inc. v. Briseno, 138 S. Ct. 313 , 199 L.
green
State Of Washington, V Carmen Copeland (2022)
See State v. Trey M., 186 Wn.2d 884, 889, 907 , 383 P.3d 474 (2016), cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 313 (2017).
green
Stokes v. Sensa Products (2019)
See Briseno v. ConAgra Foods, 17 Inc., 844 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 313 (2017).
green
Valadez v. CSX Intermodal Terminals, Inc. (2018)
See Briseno v. ConAgra Foods, Inc. , 844 F.3d 1121 , 1131 (9th Cir.), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 313 , 199 L.Ed.2d 206 (2017).
If I have an account with AOL, * * * to get access to AOL’s system, you need AOL’s permission, not my permission.”); see also Facebook, Inc., 844 F.3d at 1067 , cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 313 (2017) (finding unauthorized use where permission expressly was rescinded in a written cease and desist order).]6 Although dealers might have a breach of contract claim against CDK if CDK’s denial of authority violated its contract with the dealers, that does not change the fact that CDK …
finding unauthorized use where permission expressly was rescinded in a written cease and desist order
If I have an account with AOL, * * * to get access to AOL's system, you need AOL's permission, not my permission."); see also Facebook, Inc. , 844 F.3d at 1067 , cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 313 , 199 L.Ed.2d 206 (2017) (finding unauthorized use where permission expressly was rescinded in a written cease and desist order).] 6 Although dealers might have a breach of contract claim against CDK if CDK's denial of authority violated its contract with the dealers, that …
finding unauthorized use where permission expressly was rescinded in a written cease and desist order
green
Sandvig v. Sessions (2018)
Compare Facebook, Inc. v. Power Ventures, Inc. , 844 F.3d 1058 , 1067 (9th Cir. 2016) ("[A] violation of the terms of use of a website-without more-cannot establish liability under the CFAA."), cert. denied --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 313 , 199 L.Ed.2d 206 (2017) (mem.); Valle , 807 F.3d at 528 (rejecting unauthorized use reading of "exceeds authorized access" because "the government's interpretation of 'exceeds authorized access' makes every violation of a private computer use…
mem.