green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1958
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Brach Van Houten Holding, Inc. v. Save Brack's Coalition
Id. at 117; see also First Nat’l Maint.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Delano v. Kitch
Under such circumstances, we said, "it is the duty of the Federal court that still has jurisdiction of the case to conform its decision and judgment to the latest decision of the supreme court of the state." Id. at 223.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Delano v. Kitch
Under such circumstances, we said, “it is the duty of the Federal court that still has jurisdiction of the case to conform its decision and judgment to the latest decision of the supreme court of the state.” Id. at 223.
discussed
Cited "see"
Diduck v. Kaszycki & Sons Contractors, Inc.
In either event, as temporary visitors for pleasure, the Poles were prohibited from engaging in any employment. 8 C.F.R. § 214.1 (e); see Wei v. Robinson, 246 F.2d 739, 743 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 879 , 78 S.Ct. 144 , 2 L.Ed.2d 109 (1957); Matter of New York State Labor Relations Board v. Le Crepe, 78 Misc.2d 171, 173 , 355 N.Y.S.2d 515 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Diduck v. Kaszycki & Sons Contractors, Inc.
Sec. 214.1(e); see Wei v. Robinson, 246 F.2d 739, 743 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 879 , 78 S.Ct. 144 , 2 L.Ed.2d 109 (1957); Matter of New York State Labor Relations Board v. Le Crepe, 78 Misc.2d 171, 173 , 355 N.Y.S.2d 515 (1973). 59 On January 29, 1980, Kaszycki and his wholly owned company, Kaszycki & Sons Contractors, Inc., signed a contract with the Trump-Equitable Fifth Avenue Company ("T-E") to demolish the Bonwit Teller building on Fifth Avenue.
discussed
Cited "see"
Roc, Inc. v. Progress Drillers, Inc.
See Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Co. v. Hugh Breeding Co., 232 F.2d 584 (Tenth Cir. 1956), cert. dismissed, 355 U.S. 880 , 78 S.Ct. 138 , 2 L.Ed.2d 107 (1957); Crossroads State Bank v. Savage, supra. Defendant has not supplied this Court with sufficient factual details to enable it to determine that the forum in this judicial district is inconvenient for the witnesses in this case.
discussed
Cited "see"
Clay v. Overseas Carriers Corp.
See generally, Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co. v. Hugh Breeding, Inc., 232 F.2d 584, 588 (10 Cir. 1956) cert. den. 355 U.S. 880 , 78 S.Ct. 138 , 2 L.Ed.2d 107 (1957); General Portland Cement Co. v. Perry, 204 F.2d 316, 319-320 (7 Cir. 1953); Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corporation, 337 F.Supp. 1230, 1233 (E.D.Pa.1971); Bonnell v. Baker, 331 F.Supp. 1373, 1374 (E.D.Pa.1971); Koeneke v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 289 F.Supp. 487, 488-489 (W.D.Okla.1968); Development Company of America v. Insurance Company of North America, 249 F.Supp. 117, 118-119 (D.Md.1966); Holiday Rambler Corp. v. American …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Coplin v. United States
See, e.g., Power Authority of New York v. Federal Power Commission, 247 F.2d 538 (D.C.Cir.), vacated as moot sub nom., American Public Power Association v. Power Authority of New York, 355 U.S. 64 , 78 S.Ct. 141 , 2 L.Ed.2d 107 (1957).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Brandon v. State
Compare Lamkin v. State, 165 Tex.Cr.R. 11 , 301 S.W.2d 922 (1957), cert. denied 355 U.S. 59 , 78 S.Ct. 137 , 2 L.Ed.2d 107 (1957).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PORET Et Al.
v.
SIGLER, WARDEN
v.
SIGLER, WARDEN
268, Misc.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 18, 1957.
G. W. Gill and Gerard H. Schreiber for petitioners.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 5 opinions | Published
Per Curiam.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and in view of the action of the Supreme Court of Louisiana on September 25, 1957, in Poret v. Sigler and Poret v. Louisiana, Nos. 269 and 270, Misc., O. T. 1957, certiorari denied this day [post, p. 879], the judgments heretofore entered are vacated, and the cause is remanded to the District Court for consideration of the application for habeas corpus. The stay heretofore entered is continued in effect until final disposition of the case in the District Court.