green
Positive treatment
1.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited "see"
Biklen v. BOARD OF EDUCATION, CITY SCHOOL DIST., SYRACUSE, NY
(3×)
See Hosack v. Smiley, 276 F.Supp. 876, 881 (D.Colo. 1967), aff’d per curiam, 390 U.S. 744 , 88 S.Ct. 1442 , 20 L.Ed.2d 275 (1968); Ohlson v. Phillips, 304 F.Supp. 1152, 1155 , aff’d per curiam, 397 U.S. 317 , 90 S.Ct. 1124 , 25 L.Ed.2d 337 (1970).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO. ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
1159.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 29, 1968.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA.
Alan C. Furth, Robert L. Pierce, William P. Higgins and G. Clark Cummings for appellants.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert W. Ginnane and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al.; Ernest Porter, Dennis McCarthy, E. L. Van Dellen, Walter G. Treanor and E. Barrett Prettyman, Jr., for Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Co. et al., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.