green
Positive treatment
28.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 2018 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2018
2022
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Alford v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Under this standard, 14 courts look at “an existing administrative record and ask[] whether it contains sufficient 15 evidence to support the [ALJ’s] . . . factual determinations.” Biestek v. Berryhill, 139 S.Ct. 16 1148, 1154 (2019).
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Aggarwal v. Coinbase, Inc.
(3×)
Id. 13 Under the FAA, parties may agree to have an arbitrator decide “‘gateway’ questions of 14 ‘arbitrability,’ such as whether the parties have agreed to arbitrate or whether their agreement 15 covers a particular controversy.” Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer and White Sales, Inc., 139 S. Ct. 16 524, 529 (2019) (quoting Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. Jackson, 561 U.S. 63, 68-69 (2010)).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Nuno v. United States
In his motion, Defendant 14 argues that his conviction should be vacated because his crime of conviction, aiding and abetting 15 carjacking, does not qualify as a crime of violence in light of United States v. Davis, 139 S.Ct. 16 2319 (2019).
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Usedu v. Usdc-Casf
(3×)
also: Cited "see"
Dep’t of Com., 139 S. Ct. at 2573.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
New York Legal Assistance Group v. Board of Immigration Appeals
“Sometimes the better overall reading of the 15 statute contains some redundancy,” Rimini St., Inc. v. Oracle USA, Inc., 139 S. Ct. 16 873, 881 (2019), and Congress commonly “employ[s] a belt and suspenders 17 approach,” Atl.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Jane Doe 2 v. Patrick Shanahan
Cir. 2008) (Tatel, J., dissenting) (Instructions “published in the Federal Register would be ‘formal.’”). 46 Second, even if the “2017 Presidential directives” “abrupt[ly]” reversed the policy of the prior administration and were issued without “formality,” Doe II, 315 F. Supp. 3d at 497 , “there’s nothing unusual about a new” administration “coming to office inclined to favor a different policy direction, . . . disagreeing with staff, or cutting through red tape,” In re Dep’t of Commerce, 139 S. Ct. 16, 17 (2018) (Gorsuch, J., concurring in part, dissenting in …
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
New York v. U.S. Dep't of Commerce
(8×)
also: Cited "see"
In re Dep't of Commerce , 139 S.Ct. at 17-18 (Gorsuch, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re UNITED STATES
No. 18A410..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 19, 2018.
Cited by 7 opinions | Published
UPON CONSIDERATION of the application of counsel for the applicants,
IT IS ORDERED that discovery and trial in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, in case No. 6:15-cv-01517, are stayed pending receipt of a response, due on or before Wednesday, October 24, 2018, by 3 p.m., and further order of the undersigned or of the Court.
/s/ John G. Roberts, Jr.
Chief Justice of the United States