Com. Barge Lines, Inc. v. United States, 359 U.S. 342 (1959). · Go Syfert
Search
Com. Barge Lines, Inc. v. United States, 359 U.S. 342 (1959). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
14 citation events across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Keith v. Bay Springs Telephone Co. (miss, 1964-11-16)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Keith v. Bay Springs Telephone Co.
Miss. · 1964 · confidence medium
Ed. 2d 674 , cert. denied and appeal dismissed, 359 U.S. 341 , 79 Sup. Ct. 896, 3 L.
discussed Cited "see" Agricultural Transportation Association of Texas v. Wilbur C. King (2×)
5th Cir. · 1965 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commercial Barge Lines, Inc. v. United States, E.D.Mich. (3 Judge), 1958, 166 F.Supp. 867 , affirmed, 359 U.S. 342 , 79 S.Ct. 896 , 3 L.Ed.2d 927 . 19 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
COMMERCIAL BARGE LINES, INC., ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
721.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 27, 1959.
359 U.S. 342
Per Curiam.
Published
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN.

Dudley B. Tenney and Nuel D. Belnap for appellants.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Robert W. Ginnane and Charlie H. Johns for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellees.

Stuart B. Bradley, Carl Helmetag, Jr., J. D. Feeney, Harry C. Ames, R. Granville Curry, Frederick M. Dolan, Donald Macleay and Russell S. Bernhard for Carrier Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.