green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.1 score
“probable cause must be evaluated in relation to the circumstances as they would have appeared to prudent, cautious and trained police officers”
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Domingo Salinas-Calderon
probable cause must be evaluated in relation to the circumstances as they would have appeared to prudent, cautious and trained police officers
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Akron Board of Education and Conrad C. Ott v. State Board of Education of Ohio
The District Court stated: 75 'While the Akron Board of Education is to be congratulated for its acceptance of its constitutional burden, it may not attempt to vindicate or preserve what are essentially the rights of the school children of Akron in this case.' 76 In Sierra Club v. Morton, 405 U.S. 727 at 733 , 93 S.Ct. 1361 at 1365, 31 L.Ed.2d 636 (1972), the Supreme Court held that standing to obtain judicial review of agency action was conferred only upon those who could show 'that the challenged action had caused them 'injury in fact." 77 In United States v. Students, etc. (SCRAP), 412 U.S.…
discussed
Cited "see"
Enplanar, Inc. v. Marsh
(2×)
See Valley I, 714 F.2d at 29 , Romeo v. United States, 462 F.2d 1036, 1038 (5th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 928 , 93 S.Ct. 1361 , 35 L.Ed.2d 589 (1973); Expedient Servs., Inc. v. Weaver, 614 F.2d 56 (5th Cir.1980). 7 Furthermore, as to EJA's claims concerning the Southwest Pass project, during oral argument it was revealed that EJA no longer exists, and therefore it cannot perform the contract.
discussed
Cited "see"
Enplanar, Inc. v. Marsh
(2×)
See Valley I, 714 F.2d at 29 , Romeo v. United States, 462 F.2d 1036, 1038 (5th Cir.1972), ce rt. denied, 410 U.S. 928 , 93 S.Ct. 1361 , 35 L.Ed.2d 589 (1973); Expedient Servs., Inc. v. Weaver, 614 F.2d 56 (5th Cir.1980). 7 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Rothberg v. Kirschenbaum
See id., comment b, illustration 4, and Sparks Nugget, Inc. v. Commissioner, 458 F.2d 631, 638-39 (9 Cir.1972), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 928 , 93 S.Ct. 1362 , 35 L.Ed.2d 589 (1973), on which it is based.
cited
Cited "see"
Toombs v. Greer-Smyrna, Inc.
See Mitchell v. Mid-Continent Spring Co., 466 F.2d 24 (6th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 928 , 93 S.Ct. 1363 , 35 L.Ed.2d 589 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Shirley C. Shehadeh v. Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company of Maryland
See Mitchell v. Mid-Continental Spring Co., 466 F.2d 24, 25-27 (6th Cir. 1972), cert, denied, 410 U.S. 928 , 93 S.Ct. 1363 , 35 L.Ed.2d 589 (1973). 21 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Robbie Mae Hathaway v. Worcester City Hospital
See Klein v. Nassau County Medical Center, 347 F.Supp. 496 (E.D.N.Y.1972), appeals pending, 410 U.S. 922 , 93 S.Ct. 1361 , 35 L.Ed. 584 (1973) (New York’s refusal of Medicaid assistance for performance of other than “medically indicated” abortions denies equal pro *707 tection to indigent pregnant women seeking abortions for other reasons). 6 Accordingly, we reverse and remand for entry of an order declaring the Worcester City Hospital’s policy against the use of its facilities in conjunction with sterilization operations unconstitutional and enjoining the individual appellees from enf…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Enplanar, Inc. v. Marsh
(2×)
See also, Romeo v. United States, 462 F.2d 1036 (5th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 928 , 93 S.Ct. 1361 , 35 L.Ed.2d 589 (1973); Expedient Services, Inc. v. Weaver, 614 F.2d 56 (5th Cir.1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Clark v. Morgan's Austintown Foods, Inc.
See also Mitchell v. Mid-Continent Spring Co., 466 F.2d 24 (6th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 928 , 93 S.Ct. 1363 , 35 L.Ed.2d 589 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nyberg v. City of Virginia
See also Klein v. Nassau County Medical Center, 347 F.Supp. 496 (E.D.N.Y.1972), app. pending, 410 U.S. 922 , 93 S.Ct. 1361 , 35 L.Ed.2d 584 (1973) ; Y.W.C.A. v. Kugler, 342 F.Supp. 1048 (D.N.J.1972); McGarvey v. Magee-Women’s Hospital, 340 F.Supp. 751 (W.D.Penn.1972); Steinberg v. Brown, 321 F.Supp. 741 (N.D.Ohio 1970); Doe v. Randall, 314 F.Supp. 32 (D.Minn.1970), aff’d sub nom, Hodgson v. Randall, 402 U.S. 967 , 91 S.Ct. 1656 , 29 L.Ed.2d 132 (1971); Babbitz v. McCann, 310 F.Supp. 293 (E.D.Wis. 1970).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Maita
v.
Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board of California
v.
Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board of California
No. 72-800.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 20, 1973.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Tenth Circuit (1)
Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.