green
Positive treatment
8.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "but see"
Roban v. State
But see United States v. Martinez, 577 F.2d 960 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied 439 U.S. 914 , 99 S.Ct. 288 , 58 L.Ed.2d 262 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sylvester Thomas
See United States v. Pulido-Santoyo, 580 F.2d 352, 355 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 915 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Caro-Quintero
See, Bulger v. McClay, 575 F.2d 407, 412 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, Ward v. Bulger, 439 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 290 , 58 L.Ed.2d 263 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alex Simmons
See Bulger v. McClay, 575 F.2d 407, 411 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 290 , 58 L.Ed.2d 263 (1978); Owen v. McMann, 435 F.2d 813, 816 (2d Cir.1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 906 , 91 S.Ct. 1373 , 28 L.Ed.2d 646 (1971). 4 20 Here, it is possible in the abstract that the district court's decision not to redact the disputed testimony after the close of evidence denied appellants the opportunity to confront the evidence against them.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Simmons
See Bulger v. McClay, 575 F.2d 407, 411 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 290 , 58 L.Ed.2d 263 (1978); Owen v. McMann, 435 F.2d 813, 816 (2d Cir.1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 906 , 91 S.Ct. 1373 , 28 L.Ed.2d 646 (1971). 4 Here, it is possible in the abstract that the district courts decision not to redact the disputed testimony after the close of evidence denied appellants the opportunity to confront the evidence against them.
cited
Cited "see"
Coronado v. Lefevre
See Suggs v. La Vallee, 570 F.2d 1092 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 290 , 58 L.Ed.2d 263 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Nick Dipaolo and Edward Weather
(2×)
See United States v. Brown, 582 F.2d 197, 202 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 289 , 58 L.Ed.2d 262 (1978); United States v. Cruz, 602 F.Supp. 825, 829 (S.D.N.Y. 1985); Ochs, 548 F.Supp. at 512 .
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Albert Dupuy, United States of America v. Christie Buzard, United States of America v. Juan Antonio Tercero
(8×)
See cases cited under note 5 and particularly United States v. Brown, where the court held that where a witness is involved “[t]he government is not required to make a witness’ statement known to a defendant who is on notice of the essential facts which would enable him to call the witness and thus take advantage of any exculpatory testimony that he might furnish.” 582 F.2d 197, 200 (2d Cir.) cert. denied, 439 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 289 , 58 L.Ed.2d 262 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Blackstone
See Suggs v. LaVallee, 570 F.2d 1092 , 1118 n.65 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 439 U.S. 915 (1978). 5 For cases delineating this right, see Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975); Commonwealth v. Mott, 2 Mass. App. Ct. 47 (1974). 6 The judge has the authority, of course, to reject a guilty plea when in doubt, there being no constitutional right to plead guilty.
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Chemaly
(4×)
See United States v. Juarez, 573 F.2d 267 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 439 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 289 , 58 L.Ed.2d 262 (1978); see generally 2 W.
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Scully
See Suggs v. LaValle, 570 F.2d 1092 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 290 , 58 L.Ed.2d 263 (1978) (plea held invalid because Suggs had been mentally incompetent when they were entered); United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see"
Norman Silverstein v. Robert Henderson
For “it is contradictory to argue that a defendant may be incompetent, and yet knowingly or intelligently ‘waive’ his right to have the court determine his capacity to stand trial.” Id.; see Suggs v. LaVallee, 570 F.2d 1092, 1116-17 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 290 , 58 L.Ed.2d 263 (1978); United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Harding Salisbury, A/K/A Heavy
(2×)
See United States v. Juarez, 573 F.2d 267, 278 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 289 , 58 L.Ed.2d 262 (1978); United States v. Osser, 483 F.2d 727, 730 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1028 , 94 S.Ct. 457 , 38 L.Ed.2d 221 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pacelli v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Brown, 582 F.2d 197 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 289 , 58 L.Ed.2d 262 (1978). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Willie Horton
(2×)
Accord, United States v. Juarez, 573 F.2d 267 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 289 , 58 L.Ed.2d 262 (informant’s consent upheld even though Government agents promised him relocation expenses and to inform prosecutor and sentencing judge of his cooperation); United States v. Dowdy, 479 F.2d 213 (4th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 823 , 94 S.Ct. 124 , 38 L.Ed.2d 56 (informant’s consent upheld even though consent given under pressure of potential indictment and in return for promise of immunity).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Langston
(2×)
See e.g., United States v. Juarez, 573 F.2d 267, 281 (5th Cir.) (holding that Fed.R.Evid. 615 applies to closing argument and instructions, so as to avoid any taint of witness testimony on retrial), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 289 , 58 L.Ed.2d 262 (1978); United States v. Brewer, 947 F.2d 404, 407-10 (9th Cir.1991) (holding that 615 applies to evidentiary hearings conducted to determine admissibility of evidence); United States v. Warren, 578 F.2d 1058, 1076 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc) (holding that Fed.R.Evid. 615 applies to suppression hearings), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 956 , 100 S.Ct.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Apex Municipal Fund v. N-Group Securities
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Juarez, 573 F.2d 267, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 289 , 58 L.Ed.2d 262 (1978); Haines v. Liggett Group, Inc., 975 F.2d 81, 90 (3d Cir.1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Everardo Zuniga-Rosales, Francisco Contreras-Cardenas, Cross-Appellee
See also United States v. Juarez, 573 F.2d 267 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 915 (1978) (upholding trial court's decision to exclude witnesses from closing arguments under Federal Rule of Evidence 615); Fed.R.Evid. 615 ("At the request of a party the court shall order witnesses excluded so that they cannot hear the testimony of other witnesses, and it may make the order of its own motion."). 24 Finally, Zuniga-Rosales asserts that his convictions must be reversed because the government violated the requirements of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert L.
See, e.g., United States v. Pulido-Santoyo, 580 F.2d 352, 354 (9th Cir.) (eye contact with police not suspicious but rather a “quite natural reaction” under the circumstances), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 289 , 58 L.Ed.2d 263 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kenneth Neal Hanson
(2×)
See also United States v. Juarez, 573 F.2d 267, 278 (5th Cir.) (where indictment alleged that five ounces of heroin were involved and proof at trial indicated that the substance in question was comprised of 23.63 grams of pure heroin mixed with heroin hydrochloride salt, there was no variance), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 289 , 58 L.Ed.2d 262 (1978); 4 United States v. Woods, 568 F.2d 509, 512 (6th Cir.) (“the evidence at trial need not establish the precise amount of heroin alleged in the indictment. ... [n]or need the precise percentage of purity thereof be shown.”), cert. deni…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ralph G. Fagan
(2×)
See also United States v. Juarez, 573 F.2d 267, 280 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 289 , 58 L.Ed.2d 262 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Salvatore Joseph Marino v. Dan Vasquez, Warden
See also Bulger v. McClay, 575 F.2d 407, 411 (2d Cir.) (jury’s difficulty in reaching a verdict supported a finding of actual prejudice resulting from the jury’s discussion of extraneous evidence), ce rt. denied, 439 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 290 , 58 L.Ed.2d 263 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Billy G. Byers
See, e.g., Suggs v. LaVallee, 570 F.2d 1092, 1119 (2d Cir.) (Kaufman, J., concurring) (‘‘[P]sychiatry is at best an inexact science, if, indeed, it is a science, lacking the coherent set of proven underlying values necessary for ultimate decisions on knowledge or competence."), cert, denied, 439 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 290 , 58 L.Ed.2d 263 (1978); Diamond & Louisell, supra note 84, at 1340-43; Ennis & Litwack, Psychiatry and the Presumption of Innocence: Flipping Coins in the Courtroom, 62 Calif.L.Rev. 693, 729-32 (1974); Kubie, The Ruby Case: Who or What Was On Trial, 1 J.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Esteban Duran Longoria, United States of America v. Esteban Duran Longoria
See also United States v. Pulido-Santoyo, 580 F.2d 352 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 289 , 58 L.Ed.2d 263 (1978); United States v. Castro-Castro, 464 F.2d 336, 337 (9th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 916 , 93 S.Ct. 971 , 35 L.Ed.2d 278 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Larry Hudson v. Frank Blackburn, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
(2×)
See also United States v. Brown, 582 F.2d 197 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 289 , 58 L.Ed.2d 262 (1978).
Snead
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 78-5337.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 16, 1978.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.