Payne v. Madigan, 366 U.S. 761 (1961). · Go Syfert
Search
Payne v. Madigan, 366 U.S. 761 (1961). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
128 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 20 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Darnell Garcia (ca9, 1994-10-04)
Treatment trajectory · 1961 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1961 1993 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited "see" United States v. Darnell Garcia (3×)
9th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Payne v. Madigan, 274 F.2d 702, 704-05 (9th Cir.1960), aff'd, 366 U.S. 761 , 81 S.Ct. 1670 , 6 L.Ed.2d 853 (1961).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." National Labor Relations Board v. Local 294, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Independent
2d Cir. · 1963 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Local 553, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, etc. v. N.L.R.B., 366 U.S. 763 , 81S.Ct. 1670, 6 L.Ed.2d 853 (1961) (union control over seniority). 19 In Local 357, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, etc. v. N.L.R.B., the Court held that the establishment of a hiring hall under the union's exclusive control was not a violation of the Act.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PAYNE
v.
MADIGAN, WARDEN.
180.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1961.
366 U.S. 761
Per Curiam.
Cited by 6 opinions  |  Published
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.

Frederick M. Rowe, acting under appointment by the Court, 364 U. S. 807, argued the cause for petitioners in both cases. With him on the briefs was Howard P. Willens.

Harold H. Greene argued the cause for respondents in both cases. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Doar and David Rubin.

PER CURIAM.

The judgments are affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

[*] Together with No. 184, Young v. United States, on certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.