green
Positive treatment
4.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
People v. Parker
See People v. Spicer (1979), 79 Ill. 2d 173 , 402 N.E.2d 169 , cert. denied (1980), 446 U.S. 940 , 64 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Darby
See 469 F. Supp. 323 (S.D.N.Y. 1978), aff'd 607 F. 2d 559 (2 Cir.1979), cert. den. 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2163 , 64 L.Ed. 2d 794 (1980). [3] The original comment to the rule was published in the Report of the Supreme Court Committee on the Model Rules of Professional Conduct included as a supplement to the New Jersey Law Journal of July 28, 1983. [4] The 1984 comment to the rule was published as a supplement to the New Jersey Law Journal of July 19, 1984. [5] It would by no means follow that even if the statement was improperly admitted the conviction would be reversed.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Donald Gene Booth
See United States v. Rubies, 612 F.2d 397 , 404 n.8 (9th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2162 , 64 L.Ed.2d 794 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Reyes
Deterrence is also one of the goals supporting the requirement that the fruits of the poisonous tree be suppressed: when there is a close causal connection between illegal conduct and evidence obtained as a result of that conduct, “not only is exclusion of the evidence more likely to deter similar police misconduct in the future, but use of the evidence is more likely to compromise the integrity of the courts.” Dunaway v. New York, 442 U.S. 200, 218 , 99 S.Ct. 2248, 2259 , 60 L.Ed.2d 824 (1979); see also United States v. Preston, 608 F.2d 626, 633 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Calloway
See also United States v. Callabrass, 607 F.2d 559 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2163 , 64 L.Ed.2d 794 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Cyril Melton
See, e.g., State v. Preston, 608 F.2d 626, 639 (5th Cir.1979) cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2162 , 64 L.Ed.2d 794 (1980) (requiring that such a finding be on the record).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Isabel G. Hernandez
It is by no means necessary, however: An arrest is "proper even though the arresting officer ... received the information [establishing probable cause] from another officer.” De Los Santos, 810 F.2d at 1336 ; see also United States v. Preston, 608 F.2d 626 , 632 n. 5 (5th Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2162 , 64 L.Ed.2d 794 (1980). 13 .Supra note 12. 14 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Chester Aurelio Walker
Compare United States v. Preston, 608 F.2d 626, 638-40 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2162 , 64 L.Ed.2d 794 (1980) with United States v. Thompson, 612 F.2d 233, 234 (6th Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mary Dangerfield Bengivenga
(2×)
These are not technical; they are the factual and practical considerations of everyday life on which reasonable and prudent men, not legal technicians act.” Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160, 175 , 69 S.Ct. 1302, 1310 , 93 L.Ed. 1879 , 1890 (1949); see also United States v. Preston, 608 F.2d 626, 632 (5th Cir.1979) (quoting Brinegar), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2162 , 64 L.Ed.2d 794 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hilda Escobar De Bright
We agree with the defendant. 4 “A defendant is entitled to an instruction concerning his theory of the case if it is supported by law and has some foundation in the evidence.” United States v. Winn, 577 F.2d 86, 90 (9th Cir.1978) (emphasis added); see United States v. Falsia, 724 F.2d 1339, 1342 (9th Cir.1983); United States v. Wright, 593 F.2d 105, 107 (9th Cir.1979); United States v. Hall, 552 F.2d 273, 275 (9th Cir.1977); see also United States v. Sielaff, 615 F.2d 402, 403 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2163 , 64 L.Ed.2d 794 (1980) (“The general principle is w…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ross v. State
See also Young v. State, Del.Supr., 407 A.2d 517 (1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2163 , 64 L.Ed.2d 794 (1980). 18 . 11 Del.C. § 401 then provided as follows: (a) In any prosecution for an offense, it is an affirmative defense that, at the time of the conduct charged, as a result of mental illness or mental defect, the accused lacked substantial capacity to appreciate the wrongfulness of his conduct or lacked sufficient willpower to choose whether he would do the act or refrain from doing it. (b) If the defendant prevails in establishing the affirmative defense provided in subse…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Henry E. Herzbrun
See also e.g., United States v. Preston, 608 F.2d 626, 632 (5th Cir.1979) cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2162 , 64 L.Ed.2d 794 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Esteban Marino-Garcia and Omar Chaverra, Hernan Ardila-Boyona, William G. Suarez, Valentin Torres-Camargo, Ernesto Segundo Torres-Riasco, Evelio Pauth-Arzuza, Fabian Perdoma-Cardona, Ramon Elias Reales-Morales, United States of America v. Pablo Emilio Cassalins-Guzman, Casimiro Diaz-Castillo, Carlos Espana, Alfredo Pupo-Bolano, David Rene Olaya-Betancur, Nemecia Hidalgo-Castillo, Jaime Pimienta-Perez, and Luis Estanislao Perea-Ulloa
Accord, United States v. Dominguez, 604 F.2d 304, 308 (4th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1014 , 100 S.Ct. 664 , 62 L.Ed.2d 644 (1980) (concluding that stateless vessels have "no rights under international law."); see also United States v. Rubies, 612 F.2d 397, 403 (9th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2162 , 64 L.Ed.2d 794 (1980); United States v. Cortes, supra, 588 F.2d at 110 . 16 Furthermore, commentators discussing the issue have unanimously agreed that all nations have the right to assert jurisdiction over stateless vessels on the high seas. 9 M.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Marino-Garcia
Accord, United States v. Dominguez, 604 F.2d 304, 308 (4th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1014 , 100 S.Ct. 664 , 62 L.Ed.2d 644 (1980) (concluding that stateless vessels have “no rights under international law.”); see also United States v. Rubies, 612 F.2d 397, 403 (9th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2162 , 64 L.Ed.2d 794 (1980); United States v. Cortes, supra, 588 F.2d at 110 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John Jay Elsoffer
See also, e.g., United States v. Preston, 608 F.2d 626, 632 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2162 , 64 L.Ed.2d 794 (1980); United States v. Perkins, 608 F.2d 1064, 1067 (5th Cir. 1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Joseph
See also Fed.R.Crim.P. 7(f) and United States v. Heldon, 479 F.Supp. at 323 , and United States v. Peifer, 474 F.Supp. 498, 500 (E.D.Pa.), aff’d, 615 F.2d 1354 (3d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2162 , 64 L.Ed.2d 794 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Paul Mannino
See also United States v. Callabrass, 607 F.2d 559, 564 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2163 , 64 L.Ed.2d 794 (1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rubies
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 79-5954.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 12, 1980.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.