green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
12.7 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1992 ·
…this contention presents no federal question.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. Lugo
the prosecutor's objective, as revealed in the context of closing argument, was simply to defend credibility, and that of case, by pointing out contradictions and inconsistencies in the witness's testimony
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. Dyette
probable cause to arrest is not 556 vitiated when the basis on which the police officer acted is shown after the fact to have been erroneous, because the existence of probable cause is determined 'at the moment of arrest,' not in light of subsequent events
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. PORTER P.
(2×)
existence of probable cause is determined 'at the moment of arrest,' not in light of subsequent events
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Dowell v. CM LENSING
(2×)
this contention presents no federal question.
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Collazo
(2×)
See Commonwealth v. Storey , 378 Mass. 312 , 323-324, 391 N.E.2d 898 (1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 955 , 100 S.Ct. 2924 , 64 L.Ed.2d 813 (1980) (rhetorical question highlighting general weakness of defense was not comment on defendant's failure to testify).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Daniel
See Commonwealth v. Santaliz, 413 Mass. 238, 241 (1992), quoting Commonwealth v. Storey, 378 Mass. 312, 321 (1979), cert, denied, 446 U.S. 955 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Villatoro
See Commonwealth v. Garden, 451 Mass. 43, 47-48 (2008) (officer’s detection of odor of burnt marijuana emerging from a motor vehicle provided probable cause to search the vehicle). 3 At that point, Officer Cooley’s exit order and patfrisk of the defendant’s person were justified as a search incident to a lawful arrest. “[Pjrobable cause exists where, at the moment of arrest, the facts and circumstances within the knowledge of the police are enough to warrant a prudent person in believing that the individual arrested has committed or was committing an offense.” Commonwealth v. Alvarad…
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Gallant
See Commonwealth v. Santaliz, 413 Mass. 238, 241 (1992) (probable cause to arrest not equivalent to prima facie case). “[P]robable cause [to arrest] exists where ... the facts and circumstances ... are enough to warrant a pmdent person in believing that the individual arrested has committed ... an offense.” Commonwealth v. Storey, 378 Mass. 312, 321 (1979), cert, denied, 446 U.S. 955 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Perez
See Commonwealth v. Emuakpor, 57 Mass.App.Ct. 192,200 (2003) (“probable cause exists where, at the moment of arrest, the facts and circumstances within the knowledge of the police are enough to warrant a prudent person in believing that the individual arrested has committed or was committing an offense”), quoting Commonwealth v. Moscat, 49 Mass.App.Ct. 622, 624 (2000), quoting from Commonwealth v. Storey, 378 Mass. 312, 321 (1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 955 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Moscat
See id. at 501 . “[P]robable cause exists where, at the moment of arrest, the facts and circumstances within the knowledge of the police are enough to warrant a prudent person in believing that the individual arrested has committed or was committing an offense.” Commonwealth v. Santaliz, 413 Mass. 238, 241 (1992), quoting from Commonwealth v. Storey, 378 Mass. 312, 321 (1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 955 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Wilson
See Commonwealth v. Storey, 378 Mass. 312, 323-324 (1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 955 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Colon-Cruz
See Commonwealth v. Santos, 402 Mass. 775, 781 (1988), citing Commonwealth v. Storey, 378 Mass. 312, 317 (1979), cert, denied, 446 U.S. 955 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Lites
Compare Commonwealth v. Fernandez, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 562, 564-567 (2003). “ ‘[P]robable cause exists where, at the moment of arrest, the facts and circumstances within the knowledge of the police are enough to warrant a prudent person in believing that the individual arrested has committed or was committing an offense.’ Commonwealth v. Storey, 378 Mass. 312, 321 (1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 955 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mapalo
See also United States v. Hawkins, 614 F.2d 85, 87 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 955 , 100 S.Ct. 2926 , 64 L.Ed.2d 814 (1980) (in order to sustain a conviction under § 1708, “the government must prove that the defendant ... had the specific intent to possess the material unlawfully”); United States v. Mendez, 117 F.3d 480, 487 (11th Cir.1997) (same); United States v. Comer, 93 F.3d 1271, 1276 (6th Cir.1996) (same).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Manago
Compare Commonwealth v. Storey, 378 Mass. 312, 323-324 (1979), cert, denied, 446 U.S. 955 (1980); Commonwealth v. Ferreira, 381 Mass. 306 , 315 n. 13 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Arlene Nordgren v. Jerome Hafter
(2×)
Nordgren has stated a colorable equal protection claim, see Pappanastos v. Board of Trustees, Etc., 615 F.2d 219 (5th Cir.1980); compare Attwell v. Nichols, 608 F.2d 228, 231 (5th Cir.1979) (per curiam), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 955 , 100 S.Ct. 2924 , 64 L.Ed.2d 813 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Barton
Compare Commonwealth v. Storey, 378 Mass. 312, 324 (1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 955 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Dias
See also Commonwealth v. Storey, 378 Mass. 312, 324-325 (1979), cert, denied, 446 U.S. 955 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Levia
See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Storey, 378 Mass. 312, 316-322 (1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 955 (1980); Commonwealth v. Venios, 378 Mass. 24 (1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cepeda
v.
Henderson, Correctional Superintendent
v.
Henderson, Correctional Superintendent
No. 79-6324.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 19, 1980.
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.