green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
10.0 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Clare R. Bruffett v. Warner Communications, Inc
(2×)
But see Green v. Amerada-Hess Corp., 612 F.2d 212 (5th Cir.) (interpreting Mississippi law), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 952 , 101 S.Ct. 356 , 66 L.Ed.2d 216 (1980).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Robert Stephen Adams, Debtor. Betty Hilda Ida Koepke Moraes v. Robert Stephen Adams, Robert Stephen Adams
an amendment to an existing statute is not an acknowl-edgement by congress that the original statute is invalid. it is a common and customary legislative procedure to enact amendments strengthening and clarifying existing laws.
discussed
Cited "see"
Moon v. USP Beaumont
The court may also conduct an evidentiary hearing and “may hear conflicting written and oral evidence and decide for itself the factual issues which determine jurisdiction.” Deutsch v. Annis Enters., Inc., 882 F.3d 169 , 173 n.1 (5th Cir. 2018); Williamson, 645 F.2d at 413 ; see Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 613 F.2d 507, 511-12 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pamela Dubier, as Trustee of the Pamela Joy Dubier 2011 Revocable Trust v. Triangle Capital Properties LLC
The court may also conduct an evidentiary hearing and “may hear conflicting written and oral evidence and decide for itself the factual issues which determine jurisdiction.” Deutsch v. Annis Enters., Inc., 882 F.3d 169 , 173 n.1 (5th Cir. 2018); Williamson v. Tucker, 645 F.2d 6 404, 413 (5th Cir. 1981); see Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 613 F.2d 507, 511-12 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Residents Against Flooding v. Reinvestment Zone Number Seventeen
The court may also conduct an evidentiary hearing and "may hear conflicting written and oral evidence and decide for itself the factual issues which determine jurisdiction.” Williamson, 645 F.2d at 413 ; see Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 613 F.2d 507, 511-12 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc.
The court may also conduct an evi-dentiary hearing and "may hear conflicting written and oral evidence and decide for itself the factual issues which determine jurisdiction.” Williamson, 645 F.2d at 413 ; see Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 613 F.2d 507, 511-12 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Turner Industries Group, LLC v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 450
The court may also conduct an evi-dentiary hearing and "may hear conflicting written and oral evidence and decide for itself the factual issues which determine jurisdiction.” Williamson, 645 F.2d at 413 ; see Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 613 F.2d 507, 511-12 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Gilkerson v. Chasewood Bank
The court may also conduct an evi-dentiary hearing and "may hear conflicting written and oral evidence and decide for itself the factual issues which determine jurisdiction.” Williamson, 645 F.2d at 413 ; see Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 613 F.2d 507, 511-12 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Offiiong v. Holder
The court may also conduct an evidentiary hearing and "may hear conflicting written and oral evidence and decide for itself the factual issues which determine jurisdiction.” Williamson, 645 F.2d at 413 ; see Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 613 F.2d 507, 511-12 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Newby v. Enron Corp.
The court may also conduct an evidentiary hearing and "may hear conflicting written and oral evidence and decide for itself the factual issues which determine jurisdiction." Williamson, 645 F.2d at 413 ; see Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 613 F.2d 507, 511-12 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Clark v. Federal Deposit Insurance
The court may also conduct an evidentiary hearing and "may hear conflicting written and oral evidence and decide for itself the factual issues which determine jurisdiction.” Williamson, 645 F.2d at 413 ; see Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 613 F.2d 507, 511-12 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Marcus v. McCollum
(2×)
See Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 613 F.2d 507, 510, 513 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Blanchet v. Chevron Texaco Corp.
The court may also conduct an evidentiary héaring and “may hear conflicting written and oral evidence and decide for itself the factual issues which determine jurisdiction.” Williamson, 645 F.2d at 413 ; see Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 613 F.2d 507, 511-12 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Home Federal Bank of Tennessee, F.S.B. v. United States
(2×)
See Empresas Electronicas Walser Inc. v. United States, 223 Ct.Cl. 686, 688 , 650 F.2d 286 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 357 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Taylor v. Dam
The court may also conduct an evidentiary hearing and “may hear conflicting written and oral evidence and decide for itself the factual issues which determine jurisdiction.” Williamson, 645 F.2d at 413 ; see Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 613 F.2d 507, 511-12 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dow Jones & Co., Inc. v. Harrods, Ltd.
See Lawrence v. Dunbar, 919 F.2d 1525, 1528-29 (11th Cir.1990) (per curiam) (citing Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 613 F.2d 507, 511 (5th Cir.)), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980) (citing Mortensen v. First Fed.
discussed
Cited "see"
Perri v. United States
(2×)
See Empresas Electronics [Electronicas] Walser, Inc. v. United States, 223 Ct.Cl. 686, 688 , 650 F.2d 286 [Ct.Cl.1980], cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 357 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980) (an agency “can disavow” the unauthorized promises of its agents); Rest. (2d) Contracts, § 7 (a principal is free to affirm or to disavow the unauthorized promises of its agent, and thus contracts entered into by the agent acting beyond the scope of his authority are not void but are voidable by the principal).
examined
Cited "see"
Caldwell v. Caesar
(3×)
See Sequoyah v. TVA, 620 F.2d 1159 , 1163 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 357 , 66 L.Ed.2d 216 (1980): "There is no requirement that a religion meet any organizational or doctrinal test in order to qualify for First Amendment protection.
cited
Cited "see"
In Re the Complaint of the Sea Vessel, Inc., for Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability as the Owner of the M/v Sea Lion v v. Juan Reyes
See Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 613 F.2d 507, 511 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John Cobb and Jack R. Cobb
See Green v. Amerada-Hess Corp., 612 F.2d 212, 214 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 952 , 101 S.Ct. 356 , 66 L.Ed.2d 216 (1980) (Where Mississippi statute did not *157 provide damages for retaliatory firing, this Court had to “decide [the] issue as we believe a Mississippi court would decide it.” (citation omitted)).
discussed
Cited "see"
U.S. v. Cobb
See Green v. Amerada-Hess Corp., 612 F.2d 212, 214 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 952 , 101 S. Ct. 356 , 66 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Walker Bennett Monroe
See United States v. Tapert, 625 F.2d 111, 120-21 (6th Cir.) (applying subsequent amendment to affirm felony conviction), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 952 , 101 S.Ct. 356 , 66 L.Ed.2d 216 (1980)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Janowsky v. United States
(2×)
See Empresas Electronics Walser, Inc. v. United States, 223 Ct.Cl. 686, 688 , 650 F.2d 286 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 357 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980) (an agency “can disavow” the unauthorized promises of its agents); Rest. (2d) Contracts, § 7 (a principal is free to affirm or to disavow the unauthorized promises of its agent, and thus contracts entered into by the agent acting beyond the scope of his authority are not void but are voidable by the principal).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jones v. Gutschenritter
See Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 613 F.2d 507 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980) (case dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction after a full evidentia-ry hearing).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jones v. Gutschenritter
See Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 613 F.2d 507 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980) (case dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction after a full evidentiary hearing).
cited
Cited "see"
Stephens v. State of Mich.
See Sequoyah v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 620 F.2d 1159, 1161 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Ronald D. Nichols v. Nancy Anderson, and Canal Insurance Company, Garnishee-Appellant. Allstate Insurance Company v. Canal Insurance Company
See Green v. Amerada-Hess Corp., 612 F.2d 212 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 952 , 101 S.Ct. 356 , 66 L.Ed.2d 216 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Mozert v. Hawkins County Public Schools
Accord, Thomas v. Review Board, supra, at 713, 101 S.Ct. at 1429 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Augusta Clark v. Tarrant County, Texas
See Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 613 F.2d 507 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980). *744 In determining whether an entity is entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity, we “must examine the particular entity in question and its powers and characteristics as created by state law____” Laje v. R.E.
discussed
Cited "see"
Wheat v. United States
See Joan Dubinsky v. Eli Lilly and Company, et al, Civil Action No. A-82-CA-049, memorandum entered on February 26, 1985, citing Green v. *720 Amerada-Hess Corp, 612 F.2d 212, 214 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 952 , 101 S.Ct. 356 , 66 L.Ed.2d 216 (1980) and 19 Wright, Miller & Cooper, Federal Practice and Procedure § 4507 (1982) cf. McKenna v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 622 F.2d 657, 662-63 (3rd Cir. 1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Joseph C. Booker, D/B/A Booker Trucking Company v. City of Atlanta, a Municipal Corporation, F. M. Couvillion
See Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 613 F.2d 507 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Hospital & Service Employees Union, Local 399 v. National Labor Relations Board
Id. at 2933; see Stephens Institute v. NLRB, 620 F.2d 720 , 727 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Hospital & Service Employees Union, Local 399 v. National Labor Relations Board
Id. at 2933; see Stephens Institute v. NLRB, 620 F.2d 720 , 727 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980) 8 Whether the NLRB attempts to restrain the distribution of handbills or the publication of newspapers, the regulation of "coercive" publicity in section 8(b)(4) is clearly content-based.
cited
Cited "see"
Union Carbide Corporation v. Ugi Corporation, Amerigas, Inc. And James A. Sutton
See Cook Industries, Inc. v. Community Grain, Inc., 614 F.2d 978, 980 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 952 , 101 S.Ct. *1190 356, 66 L.Ed.2d 216 (1980) (elements required under Texas law).
discussed
Cited "see"
Council of and for the Blind of Delaware County Valley, Inc. v. Donald T. Regan, Secretary of the Treasury
See Alexander v. Gino’s, Inc., 621 F.2d 71 , 74-75 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980); Roman v. ESB, Inc., 550 F.2d 1343, 1348 (4th Cir. en banc 1976); Weisman v. MCA, Inc., 45 F.R.D. 258, 261 (D.Del.1968); Dolgow v. Anderson, 43 F.R.D. 472, 491 (E.D.N.Y.1968). .
cited
Cited "see"
Robert Allen Howerton, and Roxanna Howerton v. Jess Gabica and Marjorie Gabica
See Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 613 F.2d 507, 510-13 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ouachita National Bank, Curator of the Estate of Ted Rodgers Barbara Rodgers and Ted Rodgers v. Tosco Corporation
(2×)
See United States v. Martorano, 620 F.2d 912, 919 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 952 , 101 S.Ct. 356 , 66 L.Ed.2d 216 (1980). [I]n assessing the reasonableness of a challenge to his impartiality, each judge must be alert to avoid the possibility that those who would question his impartiality are in fact seeking to avoid the consequences of his expected adverse decision.
cited
Cited "see"
Hauptmann v. Wilentz
See United States v. Martorano, 620 F.2d 912 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 952 , 101 S.Ct. 356 , 66 L.Ed.2d 216 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Matter of King Resources Co.
(2×)
See United States v. King Resources Company, 614 F.2d 703 (10th Cir.) cert. den. 449 U.S. 952 , 101 S.Ct. 357 , 66 L.Ed.2d 216 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Debora D. Gordon v. National Youth Work Alliance
(2×)
See Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 613 F.2d 507, 511-512 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
See Memphis Development Foundation v. Factors Etc., Inc., 616 F.2d 956 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980) (exclusive right of publicity for an entertainer is not inheritable); Factors Etc., Inc. v. Pro Arts, Inc., 579 F.2d 215, 220 (2d Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 908 , 99 S.Ct. 1215 , 59 L.Ed.2d 455 (1979) (right of publicity is assignable during public figure's lifetime); Motschenbacher v. R.
discussed
Cited "see"
Fleer Corp. v. Topps Chewing Gum, Inc.
See Memphis Development Foundation v. Factors Etc., Inc., 616 F.2d 956 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980) (exclusive right of publicity for an entertainer is not inheritable); Factors Etc., Inc. v. Pro Arts, Inc., 579 F.2d 215, 220 (2d Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 908 , 99 S.Ct. 1215 , 59 L.Ed.2d 455 (1979) (right of publicity is assignable during public figure’s lifetime); Motschenbacher v. R.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jain v. United States
See, e.g., Empresas Electronicas Walser Inc. v. United States, 650 F.2d 286 (Ct. Cl. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 (1980) (an agency “can disavow” the unauthorized promises of its agents); Perri v. United States, 53 Fed.
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
National Coalition to Save Our Mall v. Norton
(3×)
See, e.g., Sequoyah v. Tennessee Valley Auth., 480 F.Supp. 608, 611-12 (E.D.Tenn.1979) (finding that Congress exempted certain projects of the Tennessee Valley Authority from the Endangered Species Act), aff'd, 620 F.2d 1159 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 357 , 66 L.Ed.2d 216 (1980); Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Weinberger, 562 F.Supp. 265, 270 (D.D.C.1983), appeal dismissed without opinion, 725 F.2d 125 (D.C.Cir.1984) (“To be sure, Con *25 gress can and does exempt projects from NEPA”) (citing Flint Ridge Development Co. v. Scenic Rivers Assoc. of Oklahoma, 426 U.S. 7…
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. United States
(3×)
See also Sequoyah v. Tennessee Valley Auth., 620 F.2d 1159 (6th Cir.), cert, denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 357 , 66 L.Ed.2d 216 (1980) (government decision to flood tribal lands for reservoir did not infringe on Cherokee Tribe’s First Amendment rights).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Alabama v. Trustees of the Big Sandy Independent School District
(3×)
See also Sequoyah v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 620 F.2d 1159, 1163 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 357 , 66 L.Ed.2d 216 (1980) (the fact that Cherokees have no written creeds or houses of worship are of little import when construing the individual beliefs-of the plaintiffs religion).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dolcie Lawrence v. Peter Dunbar, United States of America
See Bell v. Hood, 327 U.S. 678 , 66 S.Ct. 773 , 90 L.Ed. 939 (1946); see also Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 613 F.2d 507 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980) (dismissal of plaintiffs 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction affirmed where the state action that was alleged was wholly unconvincing).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Brooks v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.
See, e.g., Alexander v. Gino’s, Inc., 621 F.2d 71 (3rd Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Marvel Engineering Co. v. United States
See, e.g., Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 613 F.2d 507 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sequoyah
v.
Tennessee Valley Authority
v.
Tennessee Valley Authority
No. 80-284.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 3, 1980.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.