green
Positive treatment
8.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 37 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Doe v. Hartz
Id. (citing Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 613 F.2d 507, 511 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 *1389 (1980), and Mortensen v. First Fed.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority v. Clow Corp.
Ct. 358, 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980). 6 As to the economic factor, PRASA estimates that it would cost at least $200,000 and six-months of research to answer defendants’ interrogatories.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Pabon v. McIntosh
Alexander v. Gino’s, Inc., 621 F.2d 71 (3d Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S, Ct. 358, 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Residents Against Flooding v. Reinvestment Zone Number Seventeen
The court may also conduct an evidentiary hearing and "may hear conflicting written and oral evidence and decide for itself the factual issues which determine jurisdiction.” Williamson, 645 F.2d at 413 ; see Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 613 F.2d 507, 511-12 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc.
The court may also conduct an evi-dentiary hearing and "may hear conflicting written and oral evidence and decide for itself the factual issues which determine jurisdiction.” Williamson, 645 F.2d at 413 ; see Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 613 F.2d 507, 511-12 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Turner Industries Group, LLC v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 450
The court may also conduct an evi-dentiary hearing and "may hear conflicting written and oral evidence and decide for itself the factual issues which determine jurisdiction.” Williamson, 645 F.2d at 413 ; see Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 613 F.2d 507, 511-12 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Gilkerson v. Chasewood Bank
The court may also conduct an evi-dentiary hearing and "may hear conflicting written and oral evidence and decide for itself the factual issues which determine jurisdiction.” Williamson, 645 F.2d at 413 ; see Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 613 F.2d 507, 511-12 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Offiiong v. Holder
The court may also conduct an evidentiary hearing and "may hear conflicting written and oral evidence and decide for itself the factual issues which determine jurisdiction.” Williamson, 645 F.2d at 413 ; see Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 613 F.2d 507, 511-12 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Newby v. Enron Corp.
The court may also conduct an evidentiary hearing and "may hear conflicting written and oral evidence and decide for itself the factual issues which determine jurisdiction." Williamson, 645 F.2d at 413 ; see Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 613 F.2d 507, 511-12 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Clark v. Federal Deposit Insurance
The court may also conduct an evidentiary hearing and "may hear conflicting written and oral evidence and decide for itself the factual issues which determine jurisdiction.” Williamson, 645 F.2d at 413 ; see Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 613 F.2d 507, 511-12 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Marcus v. McCollum
(2×)
See Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 613 F.2d 507, 510, 513 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Blanchet v. Chevron Texaco Corp.
The court may also conduct an evidentiary héaring and “may hear conflicting written and oral evidence and decide for itself the factual issues which determine jurisdiction.” Williamson, 645 F.2d at 413 ; see Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 613 F.2d 507, 511-12 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Home Federal Bank of Tennessee, F.S.B. v. United States
See Empresas Electronicas Walser Inc. v. United States, 223 Ct.Cl. 686, 688 , 650 F.2d 286 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 357 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Taylor v. Dam
The court may also conduct an evidentiary hearing and “may hear conflicting written and oral evidence and decide for itself the factual issues which determine jurisdiction.” Williamson, 645 F.2d at 413 ; see Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 613 F.2d 507, 511-12 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dow Jones & Co., Inc. v. Harrods, Ltd.
See Lawrence v. Dunbar, 919 F.2d 1525, 1528-29 (11th Cir.1990) (per curiam) (citing Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 613 F.2d 507, 511 (5th Cir.)), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980) (citing Mortensen v. First Fed.
discussed
Cited "see"
Perri v. United States
See Empresas Electronics [Electronicas] Walser, Inc. v. United States, 223 Ct.Cl. 686, 688 , 650 F.2d 286 [Ct.Cl.1980], cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 357 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980) (an agency “can disavow” the unauthorized promises of its agents); Rest. (2d) Contracts, § 7 (a principal is free to affirm or to disavow the unauthorized promises of its agent, and thus contracts entered into by the agent acting beyond the scope of his authority are not void but are voidable by the principal).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re the Complaint of the Sea Vessel, Inc., for Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability as the Owner of the M/v Sea Lion v v. Juan Reyes
See Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 613 F.2d 507, 511 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Janowsky v. United States
See Empresas Electronics Walser, Inc. v. United States, 223 Ct.Cl. 686, 688 , 650 F.2d 286 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 357 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980) (an agency “can disavow” the unauthorized promises of its agents); Rest. (2d) Contracts, § 7 (a principal is free to affirm or to disavow the unauthorized promises of its agent, and thus contracts entered into by the agent acting beyond the scope of his authority are not void but are voidable by the principal).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jones v. Gutschenritter
See Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 613 F.2d 507 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980) (case dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction after a full evidentiary hearing).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jones v. Gutschenritter
See Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 613 F.2d 507 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980) (case dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction after a full evidentia-ry hearing).
discussed
Cited "see"
Augusta Clark v. Tarrant County, Texas
See Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 613 F.2d 507 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980). *744 In determining whether an entity is entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity, we “must examine the particular entity in question and its powers and characteristics as created by state law____” Laje v. R.E.
cited
Cited "see"
Joseph C. Booker, D/B/A Booker Trucking Company v. City of Atlanta, a Municipal Corporation, F. M. Couvillion
See Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 613 F.2d 507 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Hospital & Service Employees Union, Local 399 v. National Labor Relations Board
Id. at 2933; see Stephens Institute v. NLRB, 620 F.2d 720 , 727 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Hospital & Service Employees Union, Local 399 v. National Labor Relations Board
Id. at 2933; see Stephens Institute v. NLRB, 620 F.2d 720 , 727 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980) 8 Whether the NLRB attempts to restrain the distribution of handbills or the publication of newspapers, the regulation of "coercive" publicity in section 8(b)(4) is clearly content-based.
discussed
Cited "see"
Council of and for the Blind of Delaware County Valley, Inc. v. Donald T. Regan, Secretary of the Treasury
See Alexander v. Gino’s, Inc., 621 F.2d 71 , 74-75 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980); Roman v. ESB, Inc., 550 F.2d 1343, 1348 (4th Cir. en banc 1976); Weisman v. MCA, Inc., 45 F.R.D. 258, 261 (D.Del.1968); Dolgow v. Anderson, 43 F.R.D. 472, 491 (E.D.N.Y.1968). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert Allen Howerton, and Roxanna Howerton v. Jess Gabica and Marjorie Gabica
(2×)
See id. at 510 n. 4, 511, 513.
discussed
Cited "see"
Debora D. Gordon v. National Youth Work Alliance
(2×)
See Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 613 F.2d 507, 511-512 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
See Memphis Development Foundation v. Factors Etc., Inc., 616 F.2d 956 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980) (exclusive right of publicity for an entertainer is not inheritable); Factors Etc., Inc. v. Pro Arts, Inc., 579 F.2d 215, 220 (2d Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 908 , 99 S.Ct. 1215 , 59 L.Ed.2d 455 (1979) (right of publicity is assignable during public figure's lifetime); Motschenbacher v. R.
discussed
Cited "see"
Fleer Corp. v. Topps Chewing Gum, Inc.
See Memphis Development Foundation v. Factors Etc., Inc., 616 F.2d 956 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980) (exclusive right of publicity for an entertainer is not inheritable); Factors Etc., Inc. v. Pro Arts, Inc., 579 F.2d 215, 220 (2d Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 908 , 99 S.Ct. 1215 , 59 L.Ed.2d 455 (1979) (right of publicity is assignable during public figure’s lifetime); Motschenbacher v. R.
cited
Cited "see"
Paterson v. Weinberger
See Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corporation, 613 F.2d 507 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, - U.S. -, 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Estate of Presley v. Russen
See Memphis Development Foundation v. Factors Etc., Inc., 616 F.2d 956 (6th Cir.), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980); Factors Etc., Inc. v. Pro Arts, Inc., 496 F.Supp. 1090 (S.D.N.Y.1980) (permanent injunction); 444 F.Supp. 288 (S.D.N.Y.1977) (preliminary injunction) affirmed, 579 F.2d 215 (2nd Cir. 1978), cert, denied, 440 U.S. 908 , 99 S.Ct. 1215 , 59 L.Ed.2d 455 (1979); Factors Etc., Inc. v. Creative Card Co., 444 F.Supp. 279, 282 (S.D.N.Y.1977). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dolcie Lawrence v. Peter Dunbar, United States of America
See Bell v. Hood, 327 U.S. 678 , 66 S.Ct. 773 , 90 L.Ed. 939 (1946); see also Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 613 F.2d 507 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980) (dismissal of plaintiffs 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction affirmed where the state action that was alleged was wholly unconvincing).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Brooks v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.
See, e.g., Alexander v. Gino’s, Inc., 621 F.2d 71 (3rd Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Marvel Engineering Co. v. United States
See, e.g., Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 613 F.2d 507 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ladele v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
See, e.g., Alexander v. Gino’s, Inc., 621 F.2d 71 , 75 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980); Black Grievance Committee v. Philadelphia Electric Co., 79 F.R.D. 98 (E.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carolina Hernandez v. Schwegmann Brothers Giant Supermarkets, Inc.
Compare Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 613 F.2d 507, 511 (5th Cir.) (state action is a jurisdictional requirement for suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980), with Williamson v. Tucker, 645 F.2d 404, 415-16 (5th Cir.) (when jurisdictional requirement is also an element of plaintiffs claim, case should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction unless it appears from the pleadings that the claim is wholly insubstantial or frivolous), cert. denied, --- U.S. ---, 102 S.Ct. 396 , 70 L.Ed.2d 212 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Groucho Marx Productions, Inc. v. Day & Night Co.
See, e. g., Memphis Development Foundation v. Factors, 616 F.2d 956 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 953 , 101 S.Ct. 358 , 66 L.Ed.2d 217 (1980); Factors Etc., Inc. v. Pro Arts Inc., 579 F.2d 215 (2d Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 908 , 99 S.Ct. 1215 , 59 L.Ed.2d 455 (1979); Lugosi v. Universal Pictures, 25 Cal.3d 813 , 160 Cal.Rptr. 323 , 603 P.2d 425 (1979) (en banc); Felcher & Rubin, The Descendibility of the Right of Publicity: Is There Commercial Life After Death?, 89 Yale L.J. 1125 (1980); Note, The Right of Publicity — Protection for Public Figures and Celebrities, 42 Brooklyn L…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Empresas Electronicas Walser, Inc.
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 80-296.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 3, 1980.
Published
Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.