green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.8 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Schutz v. Western Publishing Co.
he smaller the sample size, the greater the likelihood that the reflects chance rather than discriminatory practices
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America, v David Cooper
See United States v. Carter, 621 F.2d 238, 240 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 858 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Harmon v. Ryan
See Cerbo v. Fauver, 616 F.2d 714 (3d Cir.), cert, denied, 449 U.S. 858 , 101 S.Ct. 158 , 66 L.Ed.2d 73 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bob Golden
See United States v. Longoria, 624 F.2d 66, 68-69 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 858 (1980); United States v. Frederickson, 601 F.2d 1358, 1364-65 (7th Cir.), cert. dnied, 444 U.S. 934 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Miller v. State
(2×)
See Cerbo v. Fauver, 616 F.2d 714, 718 (3d Cir.) (Moore ‘stresses the customary skill at the time and place of the representation’) (emphasis added), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 858 , 101 S.Ct. 158 , 66 L.Ed.2d 73 (1980).”
discussed
Cited "see"
ca8 1983
(2×)
See United States v. O'Brien, 618 F.2d 1234, 1239 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 858 , 101 S.Ct. 157 , 66 L.Ed.2d 73 (1980) (testimony of participant in both prior incident and incident at issue established existence of prior incident by clear and convincing evidence). 20 36 In light of our discussion regarding the similarity of the prior acts to the acts in issue here, we find the other acts to be sufficiently "similar in kind and reasonably close in time to the charge at trial" to be admissible.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wilford
(2×)
See United States v. O’Brien, 618 F.2d 1234, 1239 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 858 , 101 S.Ct. 157 , 66 L.Ed.2d 73 (1980) (testimony of participant in both prior incident and incident at issue established existence of prior incident by clear and convincing evidence). 20 In light of our discussion regarding the similarity of the prior acts to the acts in issue here, we find the other acts to be sufficiently “similar in kind and reasonably close in time to the charge at trial” to be admissible.
cited
Cited "see"
ca11 1983
Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a); see Williams v. Tallahassee Motors, Inc., 607 F.2d 689, 690 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 858 , 101 S.Ct. 159 , 66 L.Ed.2d 74 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Canino v. United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a); see Williams v. Tallahassee Motors, Inc., 607 F.2d 689, 690 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 858 , 101 S.Ct. 159 , 66 L.Ed.2d 74 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph Peter Frankenberry
Assuming arguendo there was minimal cross-examination (and we expressly refrain from so characterizing the cross-examination) and that this followed from a tactical decision, a collateral proceeding will provide a forum in which a district court may ascertain the “nature and plausibility of any explanations [trial] counsel may have had for [such] a decision.” United States v. Sturm, 671 F.2d at 751 ; see Cerbo v. Fauver, 616 F.2d 714 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 858 , 101 S.Ct. 158 , 66 L.Ed.2d 73 (1980) (counsel’s affidavit sufficient to explain basis for tactical decision).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Baynes
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Cerbo v. Fauver, 616 F.2d 714, 718 (3d Cir.) (Moore “stresses the customary skill at the time and place of the representation”) (emphasis added), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 858 , 101 S.Ct. 158 , 66 L.Ed.2d 73 (1980). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Baynes
(2×)
See United States v. Williams, 631 F.2d 198, 206-10 (3d Cir. 1980) (Adams, J., dissenting) (recognizing a sixth amendment right of defendants "to exercise final decisionmaking authority over certain basic questions of defense policy") 8 Compare Cerbo v. Fauver, 616 F.2d 714 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 858 , 101 S.Ct. 158 , 66 L.Ed.2d 73 (1980), where this Court held that appellate counsel's failure to raise a certain defense was not subject to constitutional attack, in part because the attorney, in an affidavit, indicated "that he had fully considered the ... defense, but because of the …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Leary v. Shinn
MM 2 ¶ 7.) 3 The Supreme Court, “in holding that a State must provide counsel for an indigent 4 appellant on his first appeal as of right, [has] recognized the superior ability of trained 5 counsel in the ‘examination into the record, research of the law, and marshalling of 6 arguments on [the appellant’s] behalf.’” Jones, 463 U.S. at 751 (second alteration in 7 original) (quoting Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353, 358 (1963)); see also United States 8 v. Ricks, 810 F.2d 195 (4th Cir. 1987) (“Decisions by appellate counsel concerning which 9 legal issues will be presented on app…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Justice v. Shinn
Here, the undersigned finds that the state 26 court’s finding that appellate counsel was not ineffective for failing to raise additional 27 claims on direct appeal is supported by the record before this Court and was not an 28 unreasonable application of Strickland. - 69 - Case 2:18-cv-03144-RCC-EJM Document 19 Filed 12/22/20 Page 70 of 78 1 The Supreme Court, “in holding that a State must provide counsel for an indigent 2 appellant on his first appeal as of right, [has] recognized the superior ability of trained 3 counsel in the ‘examination into the record, research of the law, and mar…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Calabro v. State
(2×)
United States v. Robertson, 582 F.2d 1356, 1366 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc); see also United States v. O'Brien, 618 F.2d 1234 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 858 , 101 S.Ct. 157 , 66 L.Ed.2d 73 (1980); United States v. Pantohan, 602 F.2d 855 (9th Cir.1979). 419 So.2d at 1062 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Owen v. Crosby
(2×)
United States v. Robertson, 582 F.2d 1356, 1366 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc); see also United States v. O'Brien, 618 F.2d 1234 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 858 , 101 S.Ct. 157 , 66 L.Ed.2d 73 (1980); United States v. Pantohan, 602 F.2d 855 (9th Cir.1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Janie Smith Haden
EVID. 611(c); see also United States v. O'Brien, 618 F.2d 1234, 1242 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 858 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lansdowne Swim Club
See Baldus & Cole §§ 9.1, 9.11, 9.12; Commonwealth v. Rizzo, 466 F.Supp. 1219, 1229 (E.D.Pa.1979); see also Williams v. Tallahassee Motors, Inc., 607 F.2d 689, 693 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 858 , 101 S.Ct. 159 , 66 L.Ed.2d 74 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mark Wellington, United States of America v. Jerome C. Utz
See, e.g., United States v. Longoria, 624 F.2d 66, 68 (9th Cir.) (noting that a district court’s decision to admit a prior conviction over an objection under Rule 403 “should be given great deference”), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 858 , 101 S.Ct. 158 , 66 L.Ed.2d 73 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Babat
See, e.g., United States v. O’Brien, 618 F.2d 1234, 1240-41 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 858 (1980); United States v. Pantohan, 602 F.2d 855, 857 (9th Cir. 1979); United States v. Robertson, 582 F.2d 1356, 1366 (5th Cir. 1978)(en banc).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bottoson v. State
(2×)
In construing the similarly worded Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(e)(6), the federal courts have held that before excluding statements made during a plea negotiation a "trial court must apply a two-tiered analysis and determine, first, whether the accused exhibits an actual subjective expectation to negotiate a plea at the time of the discussion, and, second, whether the accused's expectation was reasonable given the totality of the objective circumstances." United States v. Robertson, 582 F.2d 1356, 1366 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc); see also United States v. O'Brien, 618 F.2d 1234 (7th Ci…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stevens v. State
(2×)
United States v. Robertson, 582 F.2d 1356, 1366 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc); see also United States v. O'Brien, 618 F.2d 1234 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 858 , 101 S.Ct. 157 , 66 L.Ed.2d 73 (1980); United States v. Pantohan, 602 F.2d 855 (9th Cir.1979).
Helton
v.
Moore, Warden
v.
Moore, Warden
No. 79-6714.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1980.
Published
Citer courts: N.D. Illinois (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.