green
Positive treatment
0.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sampson v. Invest America, Inc.
Compare Milnarik v. M-S Commodities, Inc., 457 F.2d 274 (7th Cir.1972) and Curran v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Inc., 622 F.2d 216 , 222 n. 5 (6th Cir.1980) (cases collected), affd on other grounds, 453 U.S. 925 , 102 S.Ct. 884 , 69 L.Ed.2d 1020 (1982) (espousing a “horizontal commonality” or a pooling of investors’ interests) with Securities and Exchange Commission v. Koscot Interplanetary, Inc., 497 F.2d 473 (5th Cir.1974) (applying the “broad vertical” test which merely requires a link between the investor’s fortunes and the promoter’s efforts).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kaufman v. Magid
See, e.g., Curran v. Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Inc., 622 F.2d 216, 222-25 (6th Cir. 1980), aff’d (on unrelated issue), 453 U.S. 925 , 102 S.Ct. 884 , 69 L.Ed.2d 1020 (1982); Hirk v. Agri-Re *1097 search Council, Inc., 561 F.2d 96 (7th Cir. 1977); Wasnowic v. Chicago Board of Trade, 352 F.Supp. Í066, 1068-69 (M.D.Pa.1972), aff’d without opinion, 491 F.2d 752 (3rd Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 994 , 94 S.Ct. 2407 , 40 L.Ed.2d 773 (1974).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Elcan
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. A-13.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Aug 28, 1981.
Published
Application for stay, addressed to Justice Blackmun and referred to the Court, denied.