green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.3 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1996 ·
…we recognize that under certain circumstances the common-law right may have to yield to superior state interests, as it would even if it were constitutionally based.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Guardianship of Boyle
(2×)
we recognize that under certain circumstances the common-law right may have to yield to superior state interests, as it would even if it were constitutionally based.
cited
Cited "see"
Irby v. United States
See United States v. Hubbard, 429 A.2d 1334, 1338 (D.C.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 308 , 70 L.Ed.2d 153 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Hubbard, 429 A.2d 1334, 1337 (D.C.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 308 , 70 L.Ed.2d 153 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rose v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Covington, 459 A.2d 1067 , 1070-71 *851 (D.C.1983) (quoting United States v. Hubbard, 429 A.2d 1334, 1337-38 (D.C.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 308 , 70 L.Ed.2d 153 (1981)); Sousa v. United States, 400 A.2d 1036, 1043 (D.C.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 981 , 100 S.Ct. 484 , 62 L.Ed.2d 408 (1979); Byrd v. United States, 388 A.2d 1225, 1229 (D.C.1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ford v. United States
(2×)
In considering a claim of evidentiary insufficiency, “we must review the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, recognizing the factfinder’s role in weighing the evidence, determining the credibility of witnesses, and drawing justifiable inferences from the evidence.” Ford I, supra, 498 A.2d at 1137 ; accord, e.g., United States v. Hubbard, 429 A.2d 1334, 1337-1338 (D.C.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 308 , 70 L.Ed.2d 153 (1981); Byrd v. United States, 388 A.2d 1225, 1229 (D.C.1978); Crawford v. United States, 126 U.S.App.D.C. 156 , 375 F.2d 332 (1967); Curley …
discussed
Cited "see"
Matter of Conroy
(2×)
Accord In re Storar, 52 N.Y.2d 363, 376-77 , 420 N.E.2d 64, 70 , 438 N.Y.S.2d 266, 272-73 , cert. denied, 454 U.S. 858 , 102 S.Ct. 309 , 70 L.Ed.2d 153 (1981); Note, “Live or Let Die; Who Decides an Incompetent's Fate?
cited
Cited "see"
Easley v. United States
Accord United States v. Hubbard, 429 A.2d 1334, 1338 (D.C.) (constructive possession of narcotics), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 308 , 70 L.Ed.2d 153 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Covington
See United States v. Hubbard, 429 A.2d 1334, 1336-37 (D.C.) (double jeopardy clause does not prevent the government from appealing the post-verdict entry of a judgment of acquittal nor preclude appellate review), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 308 , 70 L.Ed.2d 153 (1981); accord United States v. DiFrancesco, 449 U.S. 117, 130 , 101 S.Ct. 426, 433 , 66 L.Ed.2d 328 (1980); United States v. Singleton, 702 F.2d 1159 (D.C.Cir.1983). *1069 Appellee Covington’s separate appeal of his conviction for reckless driving was consolidated with this proceeding by order of this court dated March 23,…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Morris
See United States v. Hubbard, 429 A.2d 1334 (D.C.1981), ce rt. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. *54 308, 70 L.Ed.2d 153 (1981); State v. Woodruff, 205 Neb. 638 , 288 N.W.2d 754 (1980); Peters v. State, 521 S.W.2d 233 (Tenn.Cr.App.1975); State v. Cleppe, 96 Wash.2d 373 , 635 P.2d 435 (1981); State v. Boyer, 91 Wash.2d 342 , 588 P.2d 1151 (1979); State v. Hartzog, 26 Wash.App. 576 , 615 P.2d 480 (1980); State v. Sainz, 23 Wash.App. 532 , 596 P.2d 1090 (1979); State v. Edwards, 9 Wash.App. 688 , 514 P.2d 192 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rucker v. United States
See United States v. Hubbard, D.C.App., 429 A.2d 1334, 1338 (1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 308 , 70 L.Ed.2d 153 (1982); United States v. Staten, 189 U.S.App.D.C. 100, 105 , 581 F.2d 878, 883 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Schenectady Savings Bank
See United States v. Davis, 636 F.2d 1028, 1040 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 50 U.S.L.W. 3248 (October 5, 1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Parker v. United States
(2×)
Although we have noted that “mere proximity to an illegal item does not of itself prove knowledge coupled with dominion or control,” Curry v. United States, 520 A.2d 255, 263 (D.C.1987), we will sustain a conviction for constructive possession of drugs where that proximity “is colored by evidence linking the accused to an ongoing criminal operation of which that possession is a part.” Id.; see also United States v. Hubbard, 429 A.2d 1334, 1338 (D.C.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 308 , 70 L.Ed.2d 153 (1981). 19 In this case, the evidence amply supports a conclusion that at le…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re FTJ
Compare, e.g., United States v. Hubbard, 429 A.2d 1334, 1338 (D.C.) ("actual possession" means "the ability of a person to knowingly exercise direct physical custody or control over the property in question"), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 308 , 70 L.Ed.2d 153 (1981); United States v. Spears, 145 U.S.App.D.C. 284, 293 , 449 F.2d 946, 955 (1971) (words "immediate actual possession," for purposes of robbery statute, mean "an area within which the victim could reasonably be expected to exercise some physical control"), with United States v. Holland, supra ("constructive possession means …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re F.T.J.
Compare, e.g., United States v. Hubbard, 429 A.2d 1334, 1338 (D.C.) (“actual possession” means “the ability of a person to knowingly exercise direct physical custody or control over the property in question”), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 308 , 70 L.Ed.2d 153 (1981); United States v. Spears, 145 U.S.App.D.C. 284, 293 , 449 F.2d 946, 955 (1971) (words "immediate actual possession," for purposes of robbery statute, mean "an area within which the victim could reasonably be expected to exercise some physical control”), with United States v. Holland, supra (“constructive posse…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Curry v. United States
United States v. Covington, 459 A.2d 1067, 1070-71 (D.C.1983); see also United States v. Hubbard, 429 A.2d 1334, 1337-38 (D.C.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 308 , 70 L.Ed.2d 153 (1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ross v. United States
See, e.g., United States v. Hubbard, 429 A.2d 1334, 1337-38 (D.C.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 308 , 70 L.Ed.2d 153 (1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hilliard
v.
Wilkinson
v.
Wilkinson
No. 80-6937.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1981.
Published
Citer courts: Supreme Judicial Court of Maine (2)
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.