green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
15.0 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1991 ·
…the application of estoppel in pension cases is not altogether novel.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited "but see"
Gaynor v. Ephrata Community Hospital
(3×)
Even against an employer, “[principles of equitable estoppel are not to be applied lightly in cases involving pension benefits.” Higgins v. Carpenters Health & Welfare Fund, 524 F.Supp. 601, 607 (E.D.Pa.1981); see also Piech v. Midvale-Heppenstall Co., 594 F.Supp. 290, 299 (E.D.Pa.1984), aff'd, 770 F.2d 1070 , 72, 74 (3d Cir.1985); but see Rosen v. Hotel and Restaurant Employees Union, Local 274, 637 F.2d 592, 598 (3d Cir.) (estoppel against the pension fund), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 898 , 102 S.Ct. 398 , 70 L.Ed.2d 213 (1981).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Cartwright v. Health and Welfare Pension Fund
(3×)
the application of estoppel in pension cases is not altogether novel.
discussed
Cited "see"
ASHFORD, III, FLEMING W., PEOPLE v
Here, defendant did not meet his burden of establishing that the showup identification of him, his statements to the police, and the items seized in the courtyard, were causally related to his unlawful arrest prior to the showup identification procedure (see People v Cooley, 48 AD3d 1091, 1091 [2008], lv denied 10 NY3d 861 [2008]; see generally Arnau, 58 NY2d at 32 ), i.e., that such evidence was “ ‘obtained by exploitation’ ” of the illegal arrest (People v Holmes, 63 AD3d 1649, 1650 [2009], lv denied 12 NY3d 926 [2009]; see generally People v Rogers, 52 NY2d 527, 535 [1981], rearg de…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cruz
See United States v. Rosen, 409 F.3d 535, 549 (2nd Cir.2005) (“A guilty plea is an unconditional admission of guilt, and constitutes ‘an admission of all the elements of a formal criminal charge.’ As to those elements the plea is ‘as conclusive as a jury verdict’ ”) (quoting McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459, 466 , 89 S.Ct. 1166 , 22 L.Ed.2d 418 (1969), and LaMagna v. United States, 646 F.2d 775, 778 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 898 , 102 S.Ct. 399 , 70 L.Ed.2d 214 (1981)).
examined
Cited "see"
Kurz v. Philadelphia Electric Co.
(3×)
See Rosen v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders Union, 637 F.2d 592, 598 (3d Cir.1981) (holding that pension fund could not deny benefits to participant on grounds that participant’s employer failed to pay required contributions where fund administrator allowed employee to pay contributions himself), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 898 , 102 S.Ct. 398 , 70 L.Ed.2d 213 (1981); see also Hozier v. Midwest Fasteners, Inc., 908 F.2d 1155 , 1165 n. 10 (3d Cir.1990) (citing Rosen).
examined
Cited "see"
20 Employee Benefits Cas. 1914, Pens. Plan Guide P 23,928 Donald R. Kurz William Anderson James E.W. Beck William T. Bergen Charles W. Bowden William H. Brown Richard Cahill Armando L. Capoferri Robert C. Demarco James J. Dilolle, Sr. Vincent J. Dimaggio John J. Divalentino, Jr. William E. Drumel Victor J. Gibialante Francis T. Golden James J. Granger Elmer D. Greim, Jr. James H. Hair John M. Hoopes Benjamin J. Kilian George C. Linthicum Hubert A. McKown Jr. Henry P. McNamee Oliver K. Messner Robert E. Miller John A. Morse Samuel J. Mullen John A. Munley Stanley B. Myers John J. Nusspickel James W. Patterson Alfred B. Schumann Joseph C. Sharkey William H. Smoyer Woodrow E. Snyder James D. Sutliff Edward J. Vetner Dominic C. Viglianese G. Earle Watt Frederick W. Winterling John R. Young v. Philadelphia Electric Company Service Annuity Plan of Philadelphia Electric Company Charles L. Fritz J.L. Everett, Iii, John H. Austin, Jr., John J. Divalentino, Jr., William E. Drumel John A. Morse Samuel J. Mullen Stanely B. Myers Dominic C. Viglianese James J. Dilolle Benjamin J. Kilian Charles W. Bowden Elmer D. Greim, Jr. Frederick W. Winterling James W. Beck James H. Hair Robert C. Demarco Alfred G. Schumann Richard Cahill James W. Patterson John M. Hoopes Hubert A. McKown Jr. Robert E. Miller James D. Sutliff Henry P. McNamee Francis T. Golden William T. Bergen George C. Linthicum William W. Anderson: John R. Young Vincent J. Dimaggio Shields L. Daltroff Richard O. Folkman Alfred E. Stavola Robert H.C. Less Samuel E. Bell Donald F. Washington Frank J. Gallagher Maurice M. Peitzman Harry G. Turner, Jr. Robert I. Friend Donald C. Robinson William J. Leaman, Jr. Augustus W. O'Malley Dallas S. Scott, Jr. John S. Stillwagon Robert C. Heckesser William R. Travetti William B. Horlock James States Thomas W. Rayer John H. Vonrhine Walter Allwoerden George C. Wiedersum, Jr. James R. McCarron Salvator J. Destefano John C. Garvin A. William Lancaster Joseph A. Focht Robert Mitchell Joseph P. Subranni John F. Crawford William G. Taylor Kenneth R. Sedgley, Jr., Irwin G. Blackburn Charles R. Carey John R. Young Jessee E. Gray, Jr. James D. Derstine Allen H. Braid Paul L. Thomas Stephen Micklosh, Jr. William L. Gibbons Russell B. Murray Roland J. Markun Ernest W. Beam Raymond W. Scholl, Jr. John F. Parker Joseph F. McBride Vincent S. Boyer Martin M. Morgan and David Monzo, in 95-1795. Donald R. Kurz William Anderson James E.W. Beck William T. Bergen Charles W. Bowden William H. Brown Richard Cahill Armando L. Capoferri Robert C. Demarco James J. Dilolle, Sr. Vincent J. Dimaggio John J. Divalentino, Jr. William E. Drumel Victor J. Gibialante Francis T. Golden James J. Granger Elmer D. Greim, Jr. James H. Hair John M. Hoopes Benjamin J. Kilian George C. Linthicum Hubert A. McKown Jr. Henry P. McNamee Oliver K. Messner Robert E. Miller John A. Morse Samuel J. Mullen John A. Munley Stanley B. Myers John J. Nusspickel James W. Patterson Alfred B. Schumann Joseph C. Sharkey William H. Smoyer Woodrow E. Snyder James D. Sutliff Edward J. Vetner Dominic C. Viglianese G. Earle Watt Frederick W. Winterling John R. Young v. Philadelphia Electric Company Service Annuity Plan of Philadelphia Electric Company Charles L. Fritz J.L. Everett, III John H. Austin, Jr., Peco Energy Company, Formerly Known as Philadelphia Electric Company, Service Annuity Plan of Philadelphia Electric Company, Charles L. Fritz, J.L. Everett, III and John H. Austin, Jr., in 95-1796
(3×)
See Rosen v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders Union, 637 F.2d 592, 598 (3d Cir.1981) (holding that pension fund could not deny benefits to participant on grounds that participant's employer failed to pay required contributions where fund administrator allowed employee to pay contributions himself), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 898 , 102 S.Ct. 398 , 70 L.Ed.2d 213 (1981); see also Hozier v. Midwest Fasteners, Inc., 908 F.2d 1155 , 1165 n. 10 (3d Cir.1990) (citing Rosen ).
examined
Cited "see"
James E. Akins v. Federal Election Commission
(3×)
Accord FEC v. Machinists Non-Partisan Political League, 655 F.2d 380, 391-92 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 897 , 102 S.Ct. 397 , 70 L.Ed.2d 213 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Brown
(Supra, at 627; see, People v Rogers, 52 NY2d 527, 533 , cert denied 454 US 898 ; see also, People v Hunt, 155 AD2d 957 , Iv denied 75 NY2d 814 , People v Parris, 136 AD2d 882 , Iv dismissed 71 NY2d 1031 .) Concur—Sullivan, J.
examined
Cited "see"
Marita L. Curcio the Estate of Frederick Curcio, III v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company Capital Health Systems John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company (\John Hancock\")
(3×)
See Rosen v. Hotel and Restaurant Emp., Etc., 637 F.2d 592, 598 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 898 , 102 S.Ct. 398 , 70 L.Ed.2d 213 (1981); Phillips v. Kennedy, 542 F.2d 52 , 55 n. 8 (8th Cir.1976).
examined
Cited "see"
Curcio v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
(4×)
See Rosen v. Hotel and Restaurant Emp., Etc., 637 F.2d 592 * 598 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 898 , 102 S.Ct. 398 , 70 L.Ed.2d 213 (1981); Phillips v. Kennedy, 542 F.2d 52 , 55 n. 8 (8th Cir.1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Lee D. Holmes, Cross-Appellee
In Russell v. United States, 369 U.S. 749 , 82 S.Ct. 1038 , 8 L.Ed.2d 240 (1962), the Supreme Court set out the two criteria by which the sufficiency of an indictment is to be determined: *285 [Fjirst, whether the indictment “contains the elements of the offense intended to be charged, ‘and sufficiently apprises the defendant of what he must be prepared to meet,’ ” and, secondly, “ ‘in case any other proceedings are taken against him for a similar offence [sic], whether the record shows with accuracy to what extent he may plead a former acquittal or conviction.’ ” Id. at 763-64…
examined
Cited "see"
Donald Law v. Ernst & Young, Etc.
(3×)
See Ellenburg v. Brockway, 763 F.2d 1091 (9th Cir.1985), and Rosen v. Hotel and Restaurant Employees, et al., 637 F.2d 592 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 898 , 102 S.Ct. 398 , 70 L.Ed.2d 213 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Federal Election Commission v. Franklin
See Federal Election Commission v. Machinists Non-Partisan Political League, 655 F.2d 380, 387-388 (D.C.Cir.) [hereinafter MNPL ] (unlike federal agencies such as the FTC, SEC, or the Administrator of the Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division, the FEC has no roving statutory functions and mere “official curiosity” is insufficient as the basis for FEC investigations), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 897 , 102 S.Ct. 397 , 70 L.Ed.2d 213 (1981).
examined
Cited "see"
Ralph J. Dellacava v. Painters Pension Fund of Westchester and Putnam Counties
(3×)
See Rosen v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders Union, 637 F.2d 592 , 599-600 & n. 11 (3d Cir.) (citing Phillips v. Kennedy, 542 F.2d 52 , 55 n. 8 (8th Cir. 1976)), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 898 , 102 S.Ct. 398 , 70 L.Ed.2d 213 (1981); Restatement (Second) of Trusts § 173 comment d (1959).
examined
Cited "see"
Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. McCune
(3×)
See Rosen v. Hotel and Restaurant Employees Union, 637 F.2d 592, 597 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 898 , 102 S.Ct. 398 , 70 L.Ed.2d 213 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mary Kochton Appley v. Stuart West, Mary Kochton Appley v. National Republic Bank of Chicago
See LaMagna v. United States, 646 F.2d 775, 778 (2d Cir.) (citing McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459 , 89 S.Ct. 1166 , 22 L.Ed.2d 418 (1969)), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 898 , 102 S.Ct. 399 , 70 L.Ed.2d 214 (1981); Tom v. Twomey, 430 F.Supp. 160, 162 (N.D.Ill.1977).
examined
Cited "see"
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. Solmsen
(3×)
See Rosen v. Hotel and Restaurant Employees & Bartenders Union, 637 F.2d 592, 600 (3d Cir.) (holding that a trustee who fails to notify pensioners of an employer’s failure to make required contributions or to take action against such an employer violates fiduciary duties), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 898 , 102 S.Ct. 398 , 70 L.Ed.2d 213 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lewis D. Crockett and Ruth Emma Crockett
See United States v. Jones, 647 F.2d 696, 699 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 898 , 102 S.Ct. 399 , 70 L.Ed.2d 214 (1981); United States v. Camp, 541 F.2d 737, 740 (8th Cir.1976); United States v. Wabaunsee, 528 F.2d 1, 4 (7th Cir.1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Selzer v. Board of Education of New York
See Members of Bridgeport Housing Authority Police v. City of Bridgeport, 499 F.Supp. 760, 765 (D.Conn.1980), aff’d in part and vacated in part on other grounds, 646 F.2d 55 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 897 , 102 S.Ct. 397 , 70 L.Ed.2d 213 (1981); Ingram v. Madison Square Garden Center, 482 F.Supp. 918, 926 (S.D.N.Y.1979), aff’d as modified, 709 F.2d 807 (2d Cir.) cert. denied, 464 U.S. 937 , 104 S.Ct. 346 , 78 L.Ed.2d 313 (1983); Allen v. Amalgamated Transit Unit, Local 788, 415 F.Supp. 662, 666 (E.D.Mo.1976), aff’d in part and remanded in part on other grounds, 554 F.2d 876 (8th C…
examined
Cited "see"
Werner v. American Bakeries Co.
(3×)
See Rosen v. Hotel and Restaurant Employees & Bartenders Union of Philadelphia, Bucks, Montgomery and Delaware Counties, PA, 637 F.2d 592 , 596-98 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 898 , 102 S.Ct. 398 , 70 L.Ed.2d 213 (1981); Scheur v. Central States Pension Fund, 358 F.Supp. 1332, 1338 (E.D.Wis.1975), on rehearing, 394 F.Supp. 193 (E.D.Wis.1975), aff'd, 570 F.2d 347 (7th Cir. 1977) (denial of pension was arbitrary in light of prior assurances to the employee that he would qualify).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Najib Mansour Atisha (85-1537), Michael Covintgon (85-1775), Defendants
See United States v. Jones, 647 F.2d 696, 700 (6th Cir.) (“material alteration of the theory of criminal liability” by the court constituted an impermissible amendment to the indictment), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 898 , 102 S.Ct. 399 , 70 L.Ed.2d 214 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Baker v. Lukens Steel Company
See id. at 409a-11a The principle of estoppel may not be applied here to grant summary judgment for appellants because a material issue of fact exists as to damages.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rodriguez
See United States v. Schmader, 650 F.2d 533, 534 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 898 , 102 S.Ct. 400 , 70 L.Ed.2d 215 (1981) (after defendant entered guilty plea to conspiracy to import heroin in fulfilling his part of the plea bargain agreement, imposition of a longer sentence than that recommended by the government did not constitute a rejection of the plea bargain agreement.) Even assuming, for purposes of argument, that the government misinformed the defendant as to the maximum sentence he could receive, such would not warrant setting aside the sentence.
examined
Cited "see"
Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California Laborers Pension Trust Fund for Northern California and Laborers Training and Retraining Trust Fund for Northern California v. Advanced Lightweight Concrete Co., Inc., Cement Masons Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California Cement Masons Pension Trust Fund for Northern California Cement Masons Vacation Trust Fund for Northern California and Cement Masons Apprenticeship and Training Trust Fund for Northern California v. Advanced Lightweight Concrete Co., Inc.
(3×)
See Rosen v. Hotel and Restaurant Employees and Bartenders Union, 637 F.2d 592, 600 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 898 , 102 S.Ct. 398 , 70 L.Ed.2d 213 (1982); Kaufman, 707 F.2d at 416.
examined
Cited "see"
Laborers Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Advanced Lightweight Concrete Co.
(3×)
See Rosen v. Hotel and Restaurant Employees and Bartenders Union, 637 F.2d 592, 600 (3d Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 454 U.S. 898 , 102 S.Ct. 398 , 70 L.Ed.2d 213 (1982); Kaufman, 707 F.2d at 416 .
cited
Cited "see"
Motley v. Heckler
See Kimmes v. Califano, 647 F.2d 1028 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 898 , 102 S.Ct. 400 , 70 L.Ed.2d 214 (1981), and the cases cited therein.
examined
Cited "see"
United Independent Flight Officers, Inc. v. United Air Lines, Inc., & Air Line Pilots Association, International
(3×)
See Rosen v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees Union, Local 274, 637 F.2d 592 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 898 , 102 S.Ct. 398 , 70 L.Ed.2d 213 (1981).
examined
Cited "see"
United Independent Flight Officers, Inc. v. United Air Lines, Inc., and Air Line Pilots Association, International
(6×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Rosen v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees Union, Local 274, 637 F.2d 592 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 898 , 102 S.Ct. 398 , 70 L.Ed.2d 213 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert Earl Pryor v. James H. Rose, Warden
(2×)
See United States v. Jones, 647 F.2d 696 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 898 , 102 S.Ct. 399 , 70 L.Ed.2d 214 (1981); United States v. Carlson, 616 F.2d 446, 447 (9th Cir.1980) ("the jury was invited indeed urged" to utilize the additional language for conviction); United States v. Smolar, 557 F.2d 13, 19 (1st Cir.1977) (court instructed jury to consider additional offense despite variance with the indictment.) The trial court in the matter sub judice, by comparison, clearly instructed the jury to consider the instructions only insofar as they bore upon the particular offense "as charged in…
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Day
See United States v. Jones, 647 F.2d 696, 699 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 898 (1981); United States v. Welliver, 601 F.2d 203, 207 (5th Cir. 1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Federal Election Commission v. Florida for Kennedy Committee
(2×)
See Federal Election Commission v. Machinists Non-Partisan Political League, 655 F.2d 380 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 897 , 102 S.Ct. 397 , 70 L.Ed.2d 213 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Morrow v. South
See, Shreve Equipment, Inc. v. Clay Equipment Corp., 650 F.2d 101 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 897 , 102 S.Ct. 397 , 70 L.Ed.2d 213 (1981); Chrysler Corp. v. Fedders Corp., 643 F.2d 1229, 1234 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 893 , 102 S.Ct. 388 , *1110 70 L.Ed.2d 207 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
28 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1657, 29 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,794 Boston Chapter, Naacp v. Nancy B. Beecher, and Boston Firefighters Union, Local 718, Intervenor-Appellant. Pedro Castro v. Nancy Beecher, and Boston Police Patrolmen's Association, Inc., Intervenor-Appellant
Co., 556 F.2d 167 , 174 (3d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 , 98 S.Ct. 3145 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1161 (1978); see Ass'n Against Discrimination v. City of Bridgeport, 647 F.2d 256 , 278 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 102 S.Ct. 397 , 70 L.Ed.2d 213 (1981); Guardian's Ass'n of New York City v. Civil Service, 633 F.2d 232, 249-54 (2d Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 940 , 101 S.Ct. 3083 , 69 L.Ed.2d 954 (1981); Chance v. Board of Examiners & Bd. of Educ., 534 F.2d 993 , 1007 (2d Cir. 1976) (reh'g in banc ), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 965 , 97 S.Ct. 2920 (1977). 37 In Teamsters the Court did …
discussed
Cited "see"
Boston Chapter, NAACP v. Beecher
Co., 556 F.2d 167 , 174 (3d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 , 98 S.Ct. 3145 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1161 (1978); see Ass’n Against Discrimination v. City of Bridgeport, 647 F.2d 256 , 278 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 897 , 102 S.Ct. 397 , 70 L.Ed.2d 213 (1981); Guardian’s Ass’n of New York City v. Civil Service, 633 F.2d 232, 249-54 (2d Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 940 , 101 S.Ct. 3083 , 69 L.Ed.2d 954 (1981); Chance v. Board of Examiners & Bd. of Educ., 534 F.2d 993 , 1007 (2d Cir. 1976) (reh’gin banc), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 965 , 97 S.Ct. 2920 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
BUCHANAN, JACOB C., PEOPLE v
Here, defendant was not interrogated until almost 2½ hours after his arrest (see id. at 333-334 ; see also People v Rogers, 52 NY2d 527, 532-534 , rearg denied 54 NY2d 753 , cert denied 454 US 898 , reh denied 459 US 898 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Buchanan
Here, defendant was not interrogated until almost 2V2 hours after his arrest (see id. at 333-334 ; see also People v Rogers, 52 NY2d 527, 532-534 [1981], rearg denied 54 NY2d 753 [1981], cert denied 454 US 898 [1981], reh denied 459 US 898 [1982]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Buchanan
Here, defendant was not interrogated until almost 2V2 hours after his arrest (see id. at 333-334 ; see also People v Rogers, 52 NY2d 527, 532-534 [1981], rearg denied 54 NY2d 753 [1981], cert denied 454 US 898 [1981], reh denied 459 US 898 [1982]).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Grabski v. Aetna, Inc.
(3×)
Kurz, 96 F.3d at 1553 ; see also Rosen v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders Union, 637 F.2d 592, 598 (3d Cir.) (holding that pension fund could not deny benefits to participant on grounds that participant’s employer failed to pay required contributions where fund administrator allowed employee to pay contributions himself), cert. denied 454 U.S. 898 , 102 S.Ct. 398 , 70 L.Ed.2d 213 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michael Maietta v. Christopher Artuz, Superintendent, Greenhaven Correctional Facility
See also LaMagna v. United States, 646 F.2d 775, 778 (2d Cir.) ("plea of guilty ... was an admission of all the elements of a formal criminal charge, and was itself a conviction as conclusive as a jury verdict”), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 898 , 102 S.Ct. 399 , 70 L.Ed.2d 214 (1981).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Maez v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph, Inc.
(3×)
Co., 698 F.2d 320 , 326 (7th Cir.1983) (“Lying is inconsistent with the duty of loyalty owed by all fiduciaries and codified in [ 29 U.S.C. § 1104 ].”); Muenchow v. Parker Pen Co., 615 F.Supp. 1405, 1417 (W.D.Wis.1985) (“ERISA supplies a remedy for the wrong [of misrepresentation by fiduciaries] alleged in [plaintiffs] complaint.”); see also Rosen v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders Union of Philadelphia, 637 F.2d 592 , 600 n. 11 (3d Cir.1981) (holding a fiduciary is under a duty to communicate material facts to a plan beneficiary), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 898 , 102 S.Ct. 398 …
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
19 Employee Benefits Cas. 1283, Pens. Plan Guide P 23912x Reuben A. Maez, Linnea K. Maestas, Janet M. Cowdrey, Paul Spieker, Individually and as Representatives of a Class v. Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph, Inc. D/B/A U.S. West Communications, Inc., a Colorado Corporation Enhanced Management Transition Program Enhanced Management Transition Program Review Committee Neal Greenhalgh Fred L. Cook A. Gary Ames U.S. West, Inc., a Colorado Corporation U.S. West Management Pension Plan Employee Benefit Committee John G. Shea
(3×)
Sec. 1104 ]."); Muenchow v. Parker Pen Co., 615 F.Supp. 1405, 1417 (W.D.Wis.1985) ("ERISA supplies a remedy for the wrong [of misrepresentation by fiduciaries] alleged in [plaintiff's] complaint."); see also Rosen v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders Union of Philadelphia, 637 F.2d 592 , 600 n. 11 (3d Cir.1981) (holding a fiduciary is under a duty to communicate material facts to a plan beneficiary), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 898 , 102 S.Ct. 398 , 70 L.Ed.2d 213 (1981); District 65, UAW v. Harper & Row Publishers, Inc., 576 F.Supp. 1468, 1480 (S.D.N.Y.1983).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Wilson v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.
(3×)
Co., 858 F.2d 1154 , 1164 (6th Cir.1988); see also Drennan v. General Motors Corp., 977 F.2d 246 , 251 nn. 1 & 2 (6th Cir.1992), cert. denied — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 2416 , 124 L.Ed.2d 639 (1993); Barnes v. Lacy, 927 F.2d 539, 544 (11th Cir.), cert. denied — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 372 , 116 L.Ed.2d 324 (1991). “[A] fiduciary may not materially mislead those to whom the duties of loyalty and prudence ... are owed.” Berlin, 858 F.2d at 1168. “[Misleading communications to plan participants regarding plan administration ... will support a claim for breach of fiduciary duty.” Id.; see also Rose…
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Howe v. Varity Corporation
(3×)
See also Rosen v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders Union, 637 F.2d 592 , 600 n. 11 (3d Cir.) (holding a fiduciary is under a duty to communicate material facts to a plan beneficiary), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 898 , 102 S.Ct. 398 , 70 L.Ed.2d 213 (1981). 45 Indeed, in some instances a fiduciary's duty goes beyond merely refraining from making affirmative misrepresentations.
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Howe v. Varity Corp.
(3×)
See also Rosen v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders Union, 637 F.2d 592 , 600 n. 11 (3d Cir.) (holding a fiduciary is under a duty to communicate material facts to a plan beneficiary), ce rt. denied, 454 U.S. 898 , 102 S.Ct. 398 , 70 L.Ed.2d 213 (1981).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Professional Helicopter Pilots Ass'n v. Denison
(3×)
See, e.g., Rosen v. Hotel and Restaurant Employees & Bartenders Union, 637 F.2d 592, 600 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 898 , 102 S.Ct. 398 , 70 L.Ed.2d 213 (1981); Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. Solmsen, 671 F.Supp. 938, 946 (E.D.N.Y.1987); McNeese v. Health Plan Marketing, Inc., 647 F.Supp. 981, 986 (N.D.Ala.1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Butler
Moreover, since the recovery of the drugs was not a consequence of the momentary detention or seizure of defendant, but was wholly independent thereof, suppression would not be warranted even if the seizure was unreasonable (People v Milaski, 62 NY2d 147, 156 ; see also, People v Rogers, 52 NY2d 527, 532-533 , cert denied 454 US 898 , reh denied 459 US 898 ).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Acosta v. Pacific Enterprises
(3×)
Thus, an ERISA fiduciary has an affirmative duty to inform beneficiaries of circumstances that threaten the funding of benefits, Dellacava v. Painters Pension Fund, 851 F.2d 22, 27 (2d Cir.1988); see also Rosen v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees Union, 637 F.2d 592, 599-600 (3d Cir.) (holding that the Labor-Management Relations Act incorporates common law fiduciary duties relating to disclosure of information), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 898 , 102 S.Ct. 398 , 70 L.Ed.2d 213 (1981), and to provide an individual faced with termination of plan coverage, upon request, "complete and correct material infor…
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Acosta v. Pacific Enterprises
(3×)
Thus, an ERISA fiduciary has an affirmative duty to inform beneficiaries of circumstances that threaten the funding of benefits, Dellacava v. Painters Pension Fund, 851 F.2d 22, 27 (2d Cir.1988); see also Rosen v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees Union, 637 F.2d 592, 599-600 (3d Cir.) (holding that the Labor-Management Relations Act incorporates common law fiduciary duties relating to disclosure of information), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 898 , 102 S.Ct. 398 , 70 L.Ed.2d 213 (1981), and to provide an individual faced with termination of plan coverage, upon request, “complete and correct material inf…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Davis
The statement made by the defendant to one of his codefendants during his detention, after his arrest, which was overheard by law enforcement officials, was not the result of custodial interrogation and, in fact, was spontaneously made (see, People v Bryant, 87 AD2d 873 , affd 59 NY2d 786 ; see also, People v Rogers, 52 NY2d 527 , cert denied 454 US 898 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders International Pension Fund
v.
Rosen
v.
Rosen
No. 81-308.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 13, 1981.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: D. Maryland (3)
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.