Army & Air Force Exch. Serv. v. Gorman, 457 U.S. 1102 (1982). · Go Syfert
Army & Air Force Exch. Serv. v. Gorman, 457 U.S. 1102 (1982). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
54 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 14 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Owens v. State (md, 1999-02-12)
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982 2004 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Owens v. State (2×)
Md. · 1999 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
the primary consideration in prohibiting unlawful, consensual intercourse with an underage female has been traditionally attributed to the legislative desire to protect those who are too unsophisticated to protect themselves.
discussed Cited "see" Ruiz v. Hull (2×)
Ariz. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Town of Chino Valley v. City of Prescott, 131 Ariz. 78, 84 , 638 P.2d 1324, 1330 (1981), appeal dismissed, 457 U.S. 1101 , 102 S.Ct. 2897 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1310 , reh. denied, 459 U.S. 899 , 103 S.Ct. 199 , 74 L.Ed.2d 160 (1982), citing City of Tempe v. Prudential Ins.
discussed Cited "see" Foundation Development Corp. v. Loehmann's, Inc.
Ariz. Ct. App. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Town of Chino Valley v. City of Prescott, 131 Ariz. 78 , 638 P.2d 1324 (1981), appeal dismissed, 457 U.S. 1101 , 102 S.Ct. 2897 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1310 , reh’g denied, 459 U.S. 899 , 103 S.Ct. 199 , 74 L.Ed.2d 160 (1982).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Edwards v. Consolidated Rail Corp. (2×)
D.D.C. · 1983 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See e.g., Henry v. District Court, 645 P.2d 1350, 1352 (Mont.), appeal dism’d sub nom Burlington Northern, Inc. v. Henry, 457 U.S. 1101 , 102 S.Ct. 2898 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1310 (1982); Rucker v. Norfolk & Western Ry.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Army and Air Force Exchange Service
v.
Gorman
No. 80-1435.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 7, 1982.
457 U.S. 1102

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Army and Air Force Exchange Service v. Sheehan, 456 U. S. 728 (1982).