green
Positive treatment
1.7 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Carroll Ex Rel. Carroll v. Capalbo
Such an evaluation is the gatepost to the development of an IEP for the child and subsequent assignment to an appropriate special education program. 34 C.F.R. §§ 300.530-43 (1982); see Springdale School District # 50 v. Grace, 656 F.2d 300 , 303-04 (8th Cir.1981), vacated on other grounds,-U.S.-, 102 S.Ct. 3504 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1380 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In the Interest of \A\" Children"
See, e.g., Davis v. Page, 640 F.2d 599, 604 (5th Cir.1981) (holding that “in a formal adjudication of dependency under Florida law, where prolonged or indefinite deprivation of parental custody is threatened, due process requires that an indigent parent be offered counsel and that counsel be provided unless a knowing and intelligent waiver is made”), vacated on other grounds by Chastain v. Davis, 458 U.S. 1118 , 102 S.Ct. 3504 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1380 (1982); Smith v. Edmiston, 431 F.Supp. 941 , *47 945 (W.D.Tenn.1977) (holding that “the due process clause requires that parents in dependency an…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matter of Adoption of KAS
See, e.g., Davis v. Page, 640 F.2d 599 (5th Cir.1981), vacated on other grounds, 458 U.S. 1118 , 102 S.Ct. 3504 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1380 (1982); Smith v. Edmiston, 431 F.Supp. 941 (W.D.Tenn.1977); Shappy v. Knight, 251 Ark. 943 , 475 S.W.2d 704 (1972); In re Rodriguez, 34 Cal.App.3d 510 , 110 Cal.Rptr. 56 (1973); Danforth v. State Department of Health and Welfare, 303 A.2d 794 (Me.1973) [federal and state due process grounds]; Department of Public Welfare v. J.K.B., 379 Mass. 1 , 393 N.E.2d 406 (1979); Reist v. Bay County Circuit Judge, 396 Mich. 326 , 241 N.W.2d 55 (1976); In Interest of Friesz, 190…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pan American Savings & Loan Assn.
v.
Panko
v.
Panko
No. 81-922.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jul 2, 1982.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Appeal from Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. De la Cuesta, ante, p. 141.