green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.9 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 41 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Francis Floyd Ant
(2×)
But see United States v. Fleishman, 684 F.2d 1329, 1346 (9th Cir.) (in a drug case, sentencing judge’s consideration of prior uncounseled Mexican convictions on drug charges was not error when judge was aware of the constitutional infirmities of the prior convictions and enhanced the sentence, not because of the convictions, but because the defendants "had been involved in drug-related offenses and had not learned from their experiences”), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1044 , 103 S.Ct. 464 , 74 L.Ed.2d 614 (1982). .
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Millan
failure to assert before trial a particular ground for a motion to suppress certain evidence operates as a waiver of the right to challenge the admissibility of the evidence on ground.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Franklin v. Duncan
as long as police do nothing to direct or control or involve themselves in the questioning of a person in custody by a private citizen, such questioning does not violate the fifth or sixth amendments.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Diana Gonzales Buchanan, Fedell Anderson, Vernon Bonner, and John Buchanan
In situations such as the present case, “The rule is well-established that an experienced narcotics agent may testify about the significance of certain conduct or methods of operation unique to the drug distribution business, as such testimony is often helpful in assisting the trier of fact understand the evidence.” United States v. Washington, 44 F.3d 1271, 1283 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 2011 , 131 L.Ed.2d 1010 (1995); see United States v. Fleishman, 684 F.2d 1329, 1335-36 (9th Cir.) (finding no error in admission of agent’s testimony that defendant acted as a “l…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert E. Johnson, United States of America v. Charles Edwin Nottingham, United States of America v. Dee Dee Romo, A/K/A Deidre Harrell, United States of America v. Gerald Lee Carroll
See United States v. Surridge, 687 F.2d 250, 253 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1044 , 103 S.Ct. 465 , 74 L.Ed.2d 614 (1982): 18 [T]he determination as to the relationship or understanding between the police and the informant is a factual determination.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Johnson
See United States v. Surridge, 687 F.2d 250, 253 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1044 , 103 S.Ct. 465 , 74 L.Ed.2d 614 (1982): [T]he determination as to the relationship or understanding between the police and the informant is a factual determination.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Zulquarnan Khan
See United States v. Fleishman, 684 F.2d 1329 (9th Cir.) (defendants challenged district court’s consideration at sentencing of prior, uncounselled, Mexican convictions), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1044 , 103 S.Ct. 464 , 74 L.Ed.2d 614 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Moskovits
See United States v. Fleishman, 684 F.2d 1329, 1346 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1044 , 103 S.Ct. 464 , 74 L.Ed.2d 614 (1982). 4 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Moskovits
See United States v. Fleishman, 684 F.2d 1329, 1346 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1044 , 103 S.Ct. 464 , 74 L.Ed.2d 614 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Leon Brady
(2×)
See United States v. Fleishman, 684 F.2d 1329, 1346 (9th Cir.) (sentencing court's consideration of prior uncounseled Mexican convictions was not error where court enhanced sentences on the "fact that [defendants] had been involved in drug-related offenses and had not learned from their experiences") (emphasis added), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1044 , 103 S.Ct. 464 , 74 L.Ed.2d 614 (1982); United States v. Belgard, 694 F.Supp. 1488, 1501 (D.Or.1988) ("I do not read Tucker [, 404 U.S. 443 , 92 S.Ct. 589 ] to prohibit a probation officer from using information about episodes which later led to triba…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. George Humberto Bosch, Sr.
See United States v. Fleishman, 684 F.2d 1329, 1335-36 (9th Cir.) (“recogniz[ing] the difference between opinions of a defendant’s guilt or innocence and expert testimony regarding the various roles played by persons involved in illegal enterprises”), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1044 , 103 S.Ct. 464 , 74 L.Ed.2d 614 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Felix Rodriguez
See United States v. Fleishman, 684 F.2d 1329, 1342 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1044 , 103 S.Ct. 464 , 74 L.Ed.2d 614 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Randy Lamont Patterson AKA Randy Brown, Marcus Wayne Edmundson, Tony Burton, Don Grogans, and Billy Ray Brown
See United States v. Fleishman, 684 F.2d 1329, 1340 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1044 , 103 S.Ct. 464 , 74 L.Ed.2d 614 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Stamps v. Ford Motor Co.
See United States v. Foley, 683 F.2d 273 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1043 , 103 S.Ct. 463 , 74 L.Ed.2d 613 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Jeffrey Stotts, James Poole, Jack Segura, and Wilfred Fabiano
See United States v. Fleishman, 684 F.2d 1329, 1336 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1044 , 103 S.Ct. 464 , 74 L.Ed.2d 614 (1982) (handwriting expert testimony properly allowed).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Herbert McDaniel
See United States v. Foley, 683 F.2d 273, 276-77 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1043 , 103 S.Ct. 463 , 74 L.Ed.2d 613 (1982); United States v. Allain, 671 F.2d 248, 252-53 (7th Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William John Helmel, United States of America v. Arthur Charl Stowe, United States of America v. Barry Michael Glick, United States of America v. William George Paulsen
Id.; see United States v. Surridge, 687 F.2d 250, 255 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1044 , 103 S.Ct. 465 , 74 L.Ed.2d 614 (1982); cf. United States v. Ordonez, 737 F.2d 793, 799 (9th Cir.1983) (confrontation clause error involves substantial rights which must be reviewed even in absence of timely objection). 45 Nor can we say that the ledger's admission constituted plain error.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Larry Dean Rogers
See United States v. Fleishman, 684 F.2d 1329, 1335 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1044 , 103 S.Ct. 464 , 74 L.Ed.2d 614 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Helmel
Id.; see United States v. Surridge, 687 F.2d 250, 255 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1044 , 103 S.Ct. 465 , 74 L.Ed.2d 614 (1982); cf. United States v. Ordonez, 737 F.2d 793, 799 (9th Cir.1983) (confrontation clause error involves substantial rights which must be reviewed even in absence of timely objection).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph Oglesby
See United States v. Black, 684 F.2d 481, 485 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1043 , 103 S.Ct. 463 , 74 L.Ed.2d 613 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John B. Green
See United States v. Fleishman, 684 F.2d 1329, 1340 (9th Cir.), cert, denied, 459 U.S. 1044 , 103 S.Ct. 464 , 74 L.Ed.2d 614 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Daniel A. Monaco, Jr.
(2×)
See United States v. Fleishman, 684 F.2d 1329 , 1338 n. 10 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1044 , 103 S.Ct. 464 , 74 L.Ed.2d 614 (1982). 12 Even though the declarant is unavailable, the prosecution must prove that the statement it seeks to introduce bears "indicia of reliability." Dutton v. Evans, 400 U.S. 74, 89 , 91 S.Ct. 210, 219 , 27 L.Ed.2d 213 (1970) (plurality opinion).
cited
Cited "see"
B. Frank Thomas v. J.D. Cox, Warden
See United States v. Surridge, 687 F.2d 250, 254 (8th Cir.), cert. denied,-U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 465 , 74 L.Ed.2d 614 (1982). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Harold F. Mayo, Jr. And Mark A. McGarghan
However, “any evidence negating propensity, whether in cross-examination or otherwise, requires submission to the jury, however unreasonable the judge would consider a verdict in favor of the defendant to be.” United States v. Riley, 363 F.2d at 959 ; see United States v. Fleishman, 684 F.2d 1329, 1342 (9th Cir.1982) (“Whether there exist issues of fact as to a defense of entrapment is properly a question for the trial judge, the standard of review being abuse of discretion.”), cert. denied, -U.S.-, 103 S.Ct. 464 , 74 L.Ed.2d 614 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DIANA GONZALES BUCHANAN, FEDELL ANDERSON, VERNON BONNER, and JOHN BUCHANAN
Ed. 2d 1010 (1995); see United States v. Fleishman, 684 F.2d 1329, 1335-36 (9th Cir.) (finding no error in admission of agent's testimony that defendant acted as a "lookout" for drug transaction), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1044 , 103 S. Ct. 464 , 74 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Shore
See e.g., United States v. Fleishman, 684 F.2d 1329, 1346 (9th Cir., cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1044 , 103 S.Ct. 464 , 74 L.Ed.2d 614 (1982)) (upholding sentence where “[t]he district court was ... under no mistaken impression that the convictions were constitutionally valid under this country’s laws as was the sentencing court in Tucker’’).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Anthony Wayne Fagan, United States of America v. Anthony Wayne Fagan
See, e.g., United States v. Fleishman, 684 F.2d 1329, 1343 (9th Cir.) ("[a] prosecutor may properly comment upon a defendant's failure to present witnesses so long as it is not phrased as to call attention to defendant's own failure to testify”), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1044 , 103 S.Ct. 464 , 74 L.Ed.2d 614 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Milton Eugene Robins
See e.g., United States v. Fleishman, 684 F.2d 1329, 1340 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1044 , 103 S.Ct. 464 , 74 L.Ed.2d 614 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robins
See e.g., United States v. Fleishman, 684 F.2d 1329, 1340 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1044 , 103 S.Ct. 464 , 74 L.Ed.2d 614 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Benjamin F. Gay Iii, Roy M. Porter
Compare United States v. Wagner, 834 F.2d 1474, 1486 (9th Cir.1987) (de novo) and United States v. Doubleday, 804 F.2d 1091, 1093 (9th Cir.1986) (de novo), cert, denied, 481 U.S. 1005 , 107 S.Ct. 1628 , 95 L.Ed.2d 201 (1987) with United States v. Busby, 780 F.2d 804, 806 (9th Cir.1986) (abuse of discretion) and United States v. Fleishman, 684 F.2d 1329, 1342 (9th Cir.) (abuse of discretion), cert, denied, 459 U.S. 1044 , 103 S.Ct. 464 , 74 L.Ed.2d 614 (1982); *329 see also United States v. Sotelo-Murillo, 887 F.2d 176, 179 (9th Cir.1989) (citing conflicting cases).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Darwin Jay Robinson, Sr. v. Harold W. Clarke, Warden, Nebraska State Penitentiary
See United States v. Watson, 894 F.2d 1345, 1347-48 (D.C.Cir.1990) (finding informant working for government was entrepreneur while in jail on unrelated charge and his testimony did not violate defendant’s sixth amendment right to counsel because he did not act on government’s instruction); United States v. Hicks, 798 F.2d 446, 448-49 (11th Cir.1986) (finding informant’s testimony did *577 not violate defendant’s sixth amendment rights because although informant was working for government at time she was in jail on unrelated charge she was not deliberately planted or instructed to get …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Osama Moustaffa Soliman and Feisa El Sayed Elbroul
See, e.g., United States v. Fleishman, 684 F.2d 1329, 1346 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. *445 1044, 103 S.Ct. 464 , 74 L.Ed.2d 614 (1982) (upholding sentence where “[t]he district court was ... under no mistaken impression that the convictions were constitutionally valid under this country’s laws as was the sentencing court in Tucker”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lutrell Davis
Compare United States v. Wagner, 834 F.2d 1474, 1486 (9th Cir.1987) (district court’s refusal to give defendant’s jury instruction on theory of case reviewed de novo) and United States v. Doubleday, 804 F.2d 1091, 1093 (9th Cir.1986) (same) (dicta), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1005 , 107 S.Ct. 1628 , 95 L.Ed.2d 201 (1987), with United States v. Busby, 780 F.2d 804, 806 (9th Cir.1986) (refusal to give defendant’s entrapment instruction reviewed for abuse of discretion) and United States v. Fleishman, 684 F.2d 1329, 1342 (9th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1044 , 103 S.Ct. 464 , 74 L.Ed.2…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. David Silverman
(2×)
See also United States v. Fleishman, 684 F.2d 1329, 1338 (9th Cir.) (evidence that defendants were present during negotiations and had repeated contact with conspirators sufficient under Rule 801(d)(2)(E)), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1044 , 103 S.Ct. 464 , 74 L.Ed.2d 614 (1982); United States v. Federico, 658 F.2d 1337, 1343 (9th Cir.1981) (evidence that defendant was present at scene of drug transaction and drove others to rendezvous sufficient under Rule 801(d)(2)(E)), over ruled on other grounds, United States v. De Bright, 730 F.2d 1255, 1259 (9th Cir.1984) (en banc).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ian Lightbourne v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General
(2×)
See also United States v. Surridge, 687 F.2d 250 (8th Cir.), cert, denied, 459 U.S. 1044 , 103 S.Ct. 465 , 74 L.Ed.2d 614 (1982); United States v. Malik, 680 F.2d 1162 (7th Cir.1982). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael Paris
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Fleishman, 684 F.2d 1329, 1338-39 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1044 , 103 S.Ct. 464 , 74 L.Ed.2d 614 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Morgan Doubleday
See, e.g., United States v. Fleishman, 684 F.2d 1329, 1342 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1044 , 103 S.Ct. 464 , 74 L.Ed.2d 614 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Anthony Taylor
(2×)
See also, United States v. Surridge, 687 F.2d 250, 254-55 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1044 , 103 S.Ct. 465 , 74 L.Ed.2d 614 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Moreno L. Keplinger, Paul L. Wright, and James B. Plank
See also United States v. Black, 684 F.2d 481, 484 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1043 , 103 S.Ct. 463 , 74 L.Ed.2d 613 (1982); United States v. Shelton, 669 F.2d 446, 456-58 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 934 , 102 S.Ct. 1989 , 72 L.Ed.2d 454 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. David Silverman
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Fleishman, 684 F.2d 1329, 1338 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1044 , 103 S.Ct. 464 , 74 L.Ed.2d 614 (1982); United States v. Knight, 416 F.2d 1181, 1184 (9th Cir.1969).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Claret Echeverry
See, e.g., United States v. Fleishman, 684 F.2d 1329, 1339 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1044 , 103 S.Ct. 464 , 74 L.Ed.2d 614 (1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Perrine
v.
Mossinghoff, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks
v.
Mossinghoff, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks
No. 82-5615.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 29, 1982.
Published
Citer courts: N.D. California (1) · Court of Appeals of Washington (1)
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certio-rari denied.