green
Positive treatment
2.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Robert W. Ritchie, Personally and in His Capacity as a Partner/officer of Ritchie, Fels & Dillard, P.C.
But see United States v. Brigham Young Univ., 679 F.2d 1345 (10th Cir.1982) (holding that the summoned party may, in an enforcement proceeding, challenge the § 7609(f)(2) determination that there is a "reasonable basis for believing” there may be a violation of a revenue law), vacated and remanded (for consideration of possible mootness), 459 U.S. 1095 , 103 S.Ct. 713 , 74 L.Ed.2d 944 (1983). 10 .The other two criteria under § 7609(f) — (f)(1) and (f)(3) — are easily satisfied. 11 .Ritchie relies on Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391 , 96 S.Ct. 1569 , 48 L.Ed.2d 39 (1976), for the p…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Green Tree Servicing L.L.C. v. Hoover
(2×)
See also California v. Texas, 459 U.S. 1096, 1097 , 103 S.Ct. 714 , 74 L.Ed.2d 944 (1983) (dismissing certain defendants from a suit based on a stipulation "that each of said defendants…will be bound by a final judgment of this Court" on a specified issue).** Second, nonparty preclusion may be justified based on a variety of pre-existing "substantive legal relationship[s]" between the person to be Stark County, Case No. 2015CA00144 11 bound and a party to the judgment.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Taylor v. Sturgell
See also California v. Texas, 459 U. S. 1096, 1097 (1983) (dismissing certain defendants from a suit based on a stipulation “that each of *894 said defendants ... will be bound by a final judgment of this Court” on a specified issue). 7 Second, nonparty preclusion may be justified based on a variety of pre-existing “substantive legal relationship[s]” between the person to be bound and a party to the judgment.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hanlon
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. A-474.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 10, 1983.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Application for stay, addressed to Justice Rehnquist and referred to the Court, denied.