green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.1 score
“patent licensing agreements between competitors are sometimes struck down under antitrust laws, of course, but only upon proof of anti-competitive effect beyond that implicit in the grant of the patent”
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Verson Corp. v. Verson International Group PLC
patent licensing agreements between competitors are sometimes struck down under antitrust laws, of course, but only upon proof of anti-competitive effect beyond that implicit in the grant of the patent
discussed
Cited "see"
Engineered Products Co. v. Donaldson Co., Inc.
See [USM Corp. v. SPS Techs., Inc., 694 F.2d 505, 510 , 216 USPQ 959, 963 (7th Cir.1982) ] (“in application, the doctrine has largely been confined to a handful of specific prac-tiees”)[, cer t. denied, 462 U.S. 1107 , 103 S.Ct. 2455 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1334 (1983) ].
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Independent Service Organizations Antitrust Litigation
See USM Corp. v. SPS Technologies, Inc., 694 F.2d 505, 512-13 (7th Cir.1982) (Posner, J.) (noting that “there is no antitrust prohibition against a patent owner’s using price discrimination to maximize his income from the patent”), ce rt. denied, 462 U.S. 1107 , 103 S.Ct. 2455 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1334 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Independent Serv. Organ. Antitrust Lit.
See USM Corp. v. SPS Technologies, Inc., 694 F.2d 505, 512-13 (7th Cir. 1982) (criticizing shrimp peeler cases and finding that "there is no antitrust prohibition against a patent owner's using price discrimination to maximize his income from the patent"), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1107 , 103 S.Ct. 2455 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1334 (1983); Westinghouse, 648 F.2d at 647.
discussed
Cited "see"
CSU Holdings, Inc. v. Xerox Corp.
See USM Corp. v. SPS Technologies, Inc., 694 F.2d 505, 512-13 (7th Cir. 1982) (criticizing shrimp peeler eases and finding that “there is no antitrust prohibition against a patent owner’s using price discrimination to maximize his income from the patent”), ce rt. denied, 462 U.S. 1107 , 103 S.Ct. 2455 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1334 (1983); Westinghouse, 648 F.2d at 647.
cited
Cited "see"
Rauenhorst v. United States
See USM Corp. v. SPS Technologies, Inc., 694 F.2d 505, 509 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1107 , 103 S.Ct. 2455 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1334 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
People's Counsel of the District of Columbia v. Public Service Commission
It “has the burden of showing fully and clearly why it has taken the particular ratemaking action.” Washington Public Interest Organization v. Public Service Comm’n, supra, 393 A.2d at 75 ; accord, Metropolitan Washington Board of Trade v. Public Service Comm’n, supra, 432 A.2d at 351 . 6 However, “[w]jhere the [Commission] has accompanied its ruling with the required full and careful explanation, that ruling is entitled to great deference.” Washington Gas Light Co. v. Public Service Comm’n, 452 A.2d 375, 379 (D.C.1982), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 2454 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1334 (1…
discussed
Cited "see"
Klein v. Raysinger
(2×)
See Chastain v. Litton Systems, Inc., 527 F.Supp. 527 (W.D.N.C.1981) vacated on other grounds, 694 F.2d 957 (4th Cir.1982), cert, denied, — U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 2454 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1334 (1983); Cartwright v. Hyatt Corp., 460 F.Supp. 80 (D.C.D.C.1978); Fruit v. Schreiner, Alaska, 502 P.2d 133 (1972); Kowal v. Hofher, 181 Conn. 355 , 436 A.2d 1 (1980); Miller v. Moran, 96 Ill.App.3d 596 , 52 Ill.Dec. 183 , 421 N.E.2d 1046 (1981); Behnke v. Pierson, 21 Mich.App. 219 , 175 N.W.2d 303 (1970); Cole v. City of Spring Lake Park, Minn., 314 N.W.2d 836 (1982); Runge v. Watts, 180 Mont. 91 , 589 P.2d 145 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wong-Leong v. Hawaiian Independent Refinery, Inc.
Id. at 391-92 , 819 P.2d at 88 ; Abraham v. Onorato Garages, 50 Haw. 628, 632 , 446 P.2d 821, 825 (1968) (citing Matsumura v. County of Hawaii, 19 Haw. 496, 500 (1909)); see also Chastain v. Litton Systems, Inc., 694 F.2d 957 (4th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1106 , 103 S.Ct. 2454 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1334 (1983). 1.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
PEAL BY PEAL v. Smith
See Hart v. Ivey, 332 N.C. 299 , 420 S.E.2d 174 (1992); Camalier v. Jeffries, 113 N.C.App. 303 , 438 S.E.2d 427 (1994); see also Chastain v. Litton Systems, Inc., 694 F.2d 957 (4th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1106 , 103 S.Ct. 2454 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1334 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Peal ex rel. Peal v. Smith
App. 303 , 438 S.E.2d 427 (1994); see also Chastain v. Litton Systems, Inc., 694 F.2d 957 (4th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1106 , 77 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cresswell v. Sullivan & Cromwell
See, e.g., USM Corp. v. SPS Technologies, Inc., 694 F.2d 505, 509 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1107 , 103 S.Ct. 2455 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1334 (1983) (condoning the “well-nigh universal practice” of construing an adversary’s discovery request narrowly); Rauenhorst v. United States, 104 F.R.D. 588 , 600 n. 18 (D.Minn.1985) (indicating that narrowly construing a discovery request would have been proper).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Windsurfing International, Inc. v. AMF, Inc.
See, e.g., USM Corp. v. SPS Technologies, Inc., 694 F.2d 505, 510-14 , 216 .USPQ 959, 963-66 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 107 , 103 S.Ct. 2455 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1334 (1983); Competition Policy and the Patent Misuse Doctrine, Remarks by Roger B.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Windsurfing International, Inc. v. Amf, Incorporated, Bic Leisure Products, Inc., Windglider Fred Ostermann, Gmbh, Appellants/cross-Appellees v. Windsurfing International, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant. Windsurfing International, Inc., Cross-Appellant/appellee v. Fred Ostermann Gmbh, Amf, Inc., Downwind Corp., and Freeboard Sailing, Inc., Cross-Appellees/appellants
See, e.g., USM Corp. v. SPS Technologies, Inc., 694 F.2d 505, 510-14 , 216 USPQ 959, 963-66 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 107 , 103 S.Ct. 2455 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1334 (1983); Competition Policy and the Patent Misuse Doctrine, Remarks by Roger B.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Scott v. Greenville County
FACTS The district court made no specific findings of fact, but since the court granted summary judgment for defendants, plaintiff “is 'therefore entitled ... to have the credibility of his evidence as forecast assumed, his version of all that is in dispute accepted, all internal conflicts in it resolved favorably to him, the most favorable of possible alternative inferences from it drawn in his behalf; and, finally, to be given the benefit of all favorable legal theories invoked by the evidence so considered.” Charbonnages de France v. Smith, 597 F.2d 406, 414 (4 Cir.1979); see also Chast…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
G.T. Scott v. Greenville County
FACTS 2 The district court made no specific findings of fact, but since the court granted summary judgment for defendants, plaintiff "is therefore entitled ... to have the credibility of his evidence as forecast assumed, his version of all that is in dispute accepted, all internal conflicts in it resolved favorably to him, the most favorable of possible alternative inferences from it drawn in his behalf; and, finally, to be given the benefit of all favorable legal theories invoked by the evidence so considered." Charbonnages de France v. Smith, 597 F.2d 406, 414 (4 Cir.1979); see also Chastain…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Beaver
v.
Griggs, Warden
v.
Griggs, Warden
No. 82-1660.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 6, 1983.
Published
Citer courts: N.D. Illinois (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.