green
Positive treatment
5.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
First American Title Co. v. South Dakota Land Title Ass'n
But see Ronwin v. State Bar of Arizona, 686 F.2d 692, 696 (9th Cir.1981), cert. granted, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 2084 , 77 L.Ed.2d 296 (1983) (The court held in the context of challenged action by the state supreme court-appointed committee which grades the Arizona bar examination that the acts of this governmental body had to be “actively supervised by the state itself” in order to be immune from Sherman Act scrutiny.). .
discussed
Cited "but see"
First American Title Company Of South Dakota v. South Dakota Land Title Association
But see Ronwin v. State Bar of Arizona, 686 F.2d 692, 696 (9th Cir.1981), cert. granted, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 2084 , 77 L.Ed.2d 296 (1983) (The court held in the context of challenged action by the state supreme court-appointed committee which grades the Arizona bar examination that the acts of this governmental body had to be "actively supervised by the state itself" in order to be immune from Sherman Act scrutiny.). 14 The Court indicated that the conduct of a particular distiller under the statute would not necessarily be insulated from scrutiny under the Sherman Act, even though there …
discussed
Cited "see"
Benson v. Brower's Moving & Storage
(2×)
See 681 F.2d 1 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 926 , 103 S.Ct. 2085 , 77 L.Ed.2d 296 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Benson v. Brower's Moving & Storage, Inc.
(2×)
See 681 F.2d 1 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 926 , 103 S.Ct. 2085 , 77 L.Ed.2d 296 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Contractors, Laborers, Teamsters & Engineers Health & Welfare Plan v. Harkins Constuction & Equipment Co.
See Washington Area Carpenters’ Welfare Fund v. Overhead Door Co., 681 F.2d 1 , 9 n. 38 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. denied, — U.S. ——, 103 S.Ct. 2085 , 77 L.Ed.2d 296 (1983). 6 Whether sufficient notice of termination has been given raises a question of fact that requires an examination of the conduct of all parties.
discussed
Cited "see"
Contractors, Laborers, Teamsters & Engineers Health & Welfare Plan Contractors, Laborers, Teamsters & Engineers Pension Plan Omaha-Council Bluffs Laborers Local 1140 Holiday Trust Laborers Training Fund and Construction and General Laborers Union, Local No. 1140 v. Harkins Construction & Equipment Company, Inc., a Nebraska Corporation, Contractors, Laborers, Teamsters & Engineers Health & Welfare Plan Contractors, Laborers, Teamsters & Engineers Pension Plan Omaha-Council Bluffs Laborers Local 1140 Holiday Trust Laborers Training Fund and Construction and General Laborers Union, Local No. 1140 v. Harkins Construction & Equipment Company, Inc., a Nebraska Corporation
See Washington Area Carpenters' Welfare Fund v. Overhead Door Co., 681 F.2d 1 , 9 n. 38 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 2085 , 77 L.Ed.2d 296 (1983). 6 Whether sufficient notice of termination has been given raises a question of fact that requires an examination of the conduct of all parties.
discussed
Cited "see"
Carpenters Southern California Administrative Corp. v. Russell
See Washington Area Carpenters’ Welfare Fund v. Overhead Door Co., 681 F.2d 1, 9 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert, denied, -U.S.-, 103 S.Ct. 2085 , 77 L.Ed.2d 296 (1983); Seymour v. Coughlin Co., 609 F.2d 346 (9th Cir.1979), cert, denied, 446 U.S. 957 , 100 S.Ct. 2929 , 64 L.Ed.2d 816 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carpenters Southern California Administrative Corporation v. Larry Russell, Sr.
See Washington Area Carpenters' Welfare Fund v. Overhead Door Co., 681 F.2d 1, 9 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 2085 , 77 L.Ed.2d 296 (1983); Seymour v. Coughlin Co., 609 F.2d 346 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 957 , 100 S.Ct. 2929 , 64 L.Ed.2d 816 (1980). 11 The district court relied on the principle that a bona fide and actual discontinuance of a business by an employer, who previously had entered into a collective bargaining agreement, precludes the binding of a successor employer to the substantive terms of that earlier agreement.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Jointers of America v. Endicott Enterprises, Inc.
See also Washington Area Carpenters’ Welfare Fund v. Overhead Door Co., 681 F.2d 1 , 9 n. 38 (D.C.Cir.1982) (“The essential point is that the union and employees be put on notice that the contract is voided.”), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 926 , 103 S.Ct. 2085 , 77 L.Ed.2d 296 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United Brotherhood Of Carpenters And Jointers Of America v. Endicott Enterprises, Inc.
See also Washington Area Carpenters' Welfare Fund v. Overhead Door Co., 681 F.2d 1 , 9 n. 38 (D.C.Cir.1982) ("The essential point is that the union and employees be put on notice that the contract is voided."), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 926 , 103 S.Ct. 2085 , 77 L.Ed.2d 296 (1983). 22 The Union argues that the district court erred in finding Endicott's actions sufficiently bald and open to give the Union notice of Endicott's intent to repudiate.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Operating Engineers Pension Trust v. Beck Engineering & Surveying Co.
Id.; see also Washington Area Carpenters’ Welfare Fund v. Overhead Door Co., 681 F.2d 1, 9 (D.C.Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 926 , 103 S.Ct. 2085 , 77 L.Ed.2d 296 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Operating Engineers Pension Trust v. Beck Engineering & Surveying Co.
Id.; see also Washington Area Carpenters' Welfare Fund v. Overhead Door Co., 681 F.2d 1, 9 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 926 , 103 S.Ct. 2085 , 77 L.Ed.2d 296 (1983). 35 We need not decide whether an employer of more than one employee may rely on affirmative conduct other than a petition for a representation proceeding under Section 9 to repudiate a Section 8(f) agreement, and we decline to do so.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Estate of Cordial Gryder, Deceased, Pansy Gryder, and Pansy Gryder v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Compare Dowell v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue, 614 F.2d 1263 (10th Cir.1980) (holding that the Commissioner must assess the deficiency with respect to a fraudulent return within three years after an amended, nonfraudulent return is filed), with Badaracco v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue, 693 F.2d 298 (3d Cir.1982), cert. granted, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 2084 , 77 L.Ed.2d 296 (1983) (contra). 7 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Isenberg
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 82-967.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 16, 1983.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.