green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
10.6 score
“we have upheld application of rico to situations where the enterprise was, in effect, no more than the sum of the predicate racketeering acts.”
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Benjamin
the coconspirators need not have agreed on the details of the conspiracy, so long as they agree on the essential nature of the plan
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Tota
an indictment need only track the language of the statute.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Saine v. A.I.A., Inc.
we have upheld application of rico to situations where the enterprise was, in effect, no more than the sum of the predicate racketeering acts.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Ball
In United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42, 56 , cert. denied, 464 U.S. 840 , 917, 104 S.Ct. 133 , 134, 283, 78 L.Ed.2d 128, 261 (1983), the Second Circuit Court of Appeals took perhaps the broadest approach in stating that “any associative group” may be characterized “in terms of what it does, rather than by abstract analysis of its structure.” (emphasis in original).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Charles Frances West, Jr., United States of America v. Bradley David Thomas, United States of America v. Matthew Mervin Mills, United States of America v. James J. Williamson
Other circuits which have addressed the issue have held that Sec. 1962(c) and Sec. 1962(d) satisfy the test of Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 304 , 52 S.Ct. 180, 182 , 76 L.Ed. 306 (1932), for determining whether separate punishment may be imposed, "whether each provision requires proof of a fact which the other does not." United States v. Watchmaker, 761 F.2d 1459, 1477 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1100 , 1101, 106 S.Ct. 879 , 880, 881, 88 L.Ed.2d 917 (1986); United States v. Marrone, 746 F.2d 957, 959 (3rd Cir.1984); United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42 , 63-64 n. 18…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. West
Other circuits which have addressed the issue have held that § 1962(c) and § 1962(d) satisfy the test of Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 304 , 52 S.Ct. 180, 182 , 76 L.Ed. 306 (1932), for determining whether separate punishment may be imposed, “whether each provision requires proof of a fact which the other does not.” United States v. Watchmaker, 761 F.2d 1459, 1477 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1100 , 1101, 106 S.Ct. 879 , 880, 881, 88 L.Ed.2d 917 (1986); United States v. Marrone, 746 F.2d 957, 959 (3rd Cir.1984); United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42 , 63-64 n. 18…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Eisenberg v. Bank of New York (In Re Sattler's, Inc.)
As Judge Kaufman stated in United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42, 56 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 840 , 917, 104 S.Ct. 133 , 134, 283, 78 L.Ed.2d 128, 261 (1983), “it is logi *786 cal to characterize any associative group in terms of what it does, rather than by abstract analysis of its structure.” Accord In re Gas Reclamation, Inc. Securities Litigation, 659 F.Supp. 493, 519 (S.D.N.Y.1987).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Vincent Caputo, and Vincent Potenza
United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42, 60-61 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 840 , 917, 104 S.Ct. 134 , 283, 78 L.Ed.2d 128, 261 (1983).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In Re Energy Systems Equipment Leasing Securities Litigation
Defendants’ contention cannot withstand the Second Circuit’s holdings in United States v. Mazzei, 700 F.2d 85 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2124 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1304 (1983), United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 840 , 917, 104 S.Ct. 133 , 134, 283, 78 L.Ed.2d 128, 261 (1983), and Moss v. Morgan Stanley, Inc., 719 F.2d 5 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1025 , 104 S.Ct. 1280 , 79 L.Ed.2d 684 (1984). 19 .
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Warren Tyler
United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42, 64 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, -, -, 104 S.Ct. 133 , 134, 283, 78 L.Ed.2d 128, 128, 261 (1983).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Young
United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42, 64 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 133 , 134, 283, 78 L.Ed.2d 128, 128, 261 (1983).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Young
United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42, 64 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 133 , 134, 283, 78 L.Ed.2d 128, 128, 261 (1983). 207 It is equally well-settled that because "[a] conspiracy by its very nature is a secretive operation", United States v. Provenzano, 615 F.2d 37, 45 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 953 , 100 S.Ct. 2921 , 64 L.Ed.2d 810 , 459 U.S. 858 (1980), and because intent and knowledge are subjective facts, see United States v. Sheiner, 410 F.2d 337, 340 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 825 , 859, 90 S.Ct. 68 , 127, 24 L.Ed.2d 76, 110 (1969), the "[e]xistence of…
cited
Cited "see"
Figueroa v. Ricks
See United States v. Bagarie, 706 F.2d 42, 60 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 464 U.S. 840 , 104 S.Ct. 133 , 134, 78 L.Ed.2d 128 (1983); accord, e.g., Levine v. Scully, 1994 WL 445473 , at *5 (S.D.N.Y.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Ontai
See United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42, 55 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 840 , 104 S.Ct. 133 , 134, 78 L.Ed.2d 128 (1983); United States v. Cagnina, 697 F.2d 915, 921 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 856 , 104 S.Ct. 175 , 78 L.Ed.2d 157 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Taylor
See United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42, 67-68 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 840 , 104 S.Ct. 133 , 134, 78 L.Ed.2d 128 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Taylor
See United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42, 67-68 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 840 , 104 S.Ct. 133 , 134, 78 L.Ed.2d 128 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Chang v. Chen
See United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42, 55 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 840 , 104 S.Ct. 133 , 78 L.Ed.2d 128 (1983); United States v. Cagnina, 697 F.2d 915, 921 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 856 , 104 S.Ct. 175 , 78 L.Ed.2d 157 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Chang v. Chen
See United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42, 55 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 840 , 104 S.Ct. 133 , 78 L.Ed.2d 128 (1983); United States v. Cagnina, 697 F.2d 915, 921 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 856 , 104 S.Ct. 175 , 78 L.Ed.2d 157 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Zhang Jian Zhong
See United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42 , 63 n. 18 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 840 , 104 S.Ct. 133 , 78 L.Ed.2d 128 (three separate denials of petitions for certiorari), and cert. denied, 464 U.S. 917 , 104 S.Ct. 283 , 78 L.Ed.2d 261 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John Maturo, Joseph Samuel Pontillo
See United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42, 69 (2d Cir.) cert. denied, 464 U.S. 840 , 104 S.Ct. 133 , 134, 78 L.Ed.2d 128 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Nick Stavroulakis
We have often stated that “an indictment need do little more than to track the language of the statute charged and state the time and place (in approximate terms) of the alleged crime.” Tramunti, 513 F.2d at 1113 ; see United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42, 61 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 840 , 104 S.Ct. 134 , 78 L.Ed.2d 128 (1983); see also United States v. Bailey, 444 U.S. 394, 414 , 100 S.Ct. 624, 636 , 62 L.Ed.2d 575 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Coonan
The Supreme Court has explained that a RICO enterprise "is proved by evidence of an ongoing organization, formal or informal, and by evidence that the various associates function as a continuing unit." United States v. Turkette, 452 U.S. 576, 583 , 101 S.Ct. 2524, 2528 , 69 L.Ed.2d 246 (1981); see United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42, 55 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 840 , 104 S.Ct. 133 , 78 L.Ed.2d 128 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Coonan
The Supreme Court has explained that a RICO enterprise “is proved by evidence of an ongoing organization, formal or informal, and by evidence that the various associates function as a continuing unit.” United States v. Turkette, 452 U.S. 576, 583 , 101 S.Ct. 2524, 2528 , 69 L.Ed.2d 246 (1981); see United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42, 55 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 840 , 104 S.Ct. 133 , 78 L.Ed.2d 128 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Oneil F. Stephenson, United States of America v. Ian J. Gohagen, United States of America v. Christopher G. Constantine, United States of America v. Raymond A. Ebanks, United States of America v. Michael J. Swaby, A/K/A Tuffy Ricky
See United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42, 68 (2nd Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 840 , 104 S.Ct. 134 , 78 L.Ed.2d 128 (1983); see also United States v. Westbrook, supra. "Evidence of a conspirator's post conspiracy activity is admissible if probative of the existence of a conspiracy or the participation of an alleged conspirator, 'even though they might have occurred after the conspiracy ended.' " United States v. Fields, 871 F.2d 188, 197 (1st Cir.1989), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 369 , 107 L.Ed.2d 355 (1989), quoting Anderson v. United States, 417 U.S. 211 , 94 S.Ct. 2253 , 4…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Stephenson
See United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42, 68 (2nd Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 840 , 104 S.Ct. 134 , 78 L.Ed.2d 128 (1983); see also United States v. Westbrook, supra. “Evidence of a conspirator’s post conspiracy activity is admissible if probative of the existence of a conspiracy or the participation of an alleged conspirator, ‘even though they might have occurred after the conspiracy ended.’ ” United States v. Fields, 871 F.2d 188, 197 (1st Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 110 S.Ct. 369 , 107 L.Ed.2d 355 (1989), quoting Anderson v. United States, 417 U.S. 211 , 94 S.Ct. 22…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Torres
See United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42, 53 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 840 , 917, 104 S.Ct. 133 , 134, 283, 78 L.Ed.2d 128, 261 (1983). 73 7.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Torres
See United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42, 53 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 840 , 917, 104 S.Ct. 133 , 134, 283, 78 L.Ed.2d 128, 261 (1983). 7.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Edwin A. Towne, Jr.
Finally, even assuming arguendo that Towne’s possession of the pistol on other days did constitute other criminal activity, evidence of uncharged criminal activity is not considered “other crimes” evidence under Fed.R.Evid. 404(b) if it “arose out of the same transaction or series of transactions as the charged offense, if it [is] inextricably intertwined with the evidence regarding the charged offense, or if it is necessary to complete the story of the crime [on] trial.” United States v. Weeks, 716 F.2d 830, 832 (11th Cir.1983) (citations omitted); see United States v. Bagaric, 706 …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Feldman
See United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42, 55 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 840 , 104 S.Ct. 133 , 78 L.Ed.2d 128 (1983); United States v. Weinstein, 762 F.2d 1522 , 1537 n. 13 (11th Cir.), modified, 778 F.2d 673 (1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1110 , 106 S.Ct. 1519 , 89 L.Ed.2d 917 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Long
See United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42, 61 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 464 U.S. 840 , 104 S.Ct. 133 , 78 L.Ed.2d 128 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
MHC, Inc. v. International Union, United Mine Workers
See United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42, 55 (2nd Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 840 , 104 S.Ct. 133 , 134, 78 L.Ed.2d 128 (1983); United States v. Weinstein, 762 F.2d 1522 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1110 , 106 S.Ct. 1519 , 89 L.Ed.2d 917 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Garner
See United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42, 62-63 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 840 , 104 S.Ct. 134 , 78 L.Ed.2d 128 (1983); United States v. Salinas, 564 F.2d 688, 691-92 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 951 , 98 S.Ct. 1577 , 55 L.Ed.2d 800 (1978); United States v. Frumento, 563 F.2d 1083, 1087 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1072 , 98 S.Ct. 1256 , 1258, 55 L.Ed.2d 775 , 776 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Garner
See United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42, 62-63 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 840 , 104 S.Ct. 134 , 78 L.Ed.2d 128 (1983); United States v. Salinas, 564 F.2d 688, 691-92 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 951 , 98 S.Ct. 1577 , 55 L.Ed.2d 800 (1978); United States v. Frumento, 563 F.2d 1083, 1087 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1072 , 98 S.Ct. 1256 , 1258, 55 L.Ed.2d 775 , 776 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jay Teitler and Marc G. Schultz
This Court rejected the government’s argument and stated that “to convict on a RICO conspiracy [the government] must prove that defendant himself at least agreed to commit two or more predicate crimes.” Id.; see United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42 , 62 & n. 17 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 917 , 104 S.Ct. 283 , 78 L.Ed.2d 261 and 464 U.S. 840 , 104 S.Ct. 134 , 78 L.Ed.2d 128 (1983); United States v. Barton, 647 F.2d 224, 237 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 307 , 70 L.Ed.2d 152 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Castellano
See United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42 , 63 n. 18 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 133 , 78 L.Ed.2d 128 (1983); United States v. Alessi, 638 F.2d 466, 472-76 (2d Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Josiah L. Merrill, III
See United States v. Callahan, 702 F.2d 964, 965-66 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 133 , 78 L.Ed.2d 128 (1983); United States v. Vincent, 681 F.2d 462, 464 (6th Cir. 1982); United States v. Carrier, 672 F.2d 300, 306 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1139 , 102 S.Ct. 2927 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1359 (1982); United States v. Frederickson, 601 F.2d 1358, 1363 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 934 , 100 S.Ct. 281 , 62 L.Ed.2d 193 (1979); United States v. Hall, 493 F.2d 904 , 905 (5th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1044 , 95 S.Ct. 2661 , 45 L.Ed.2d 696 (1975); United States v. Hart, 457…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Karake
For example, “statements elicited during overseas interrogation by foreign police in the absence of Miranda warnings must be suppressed whenever United States law enforcement agents actively participate in questioning conducted by foreign authorities.” Yousef, 327 F.3d at 145; see also United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42, 69 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 840 , 104 S.Ct. 133 , 78 L.Ed.2d 128 (1983); United States v. Bin Laden, 132 F.Supp.2d 168, 187 (S.D.N.Y.2001).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Petersen v. State
See, e.g., United States v. Callahan, 702 F.2d 964, 966 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied 464 U.S. 840 , 104 S.Ct. 133 , 78 L.Ed.2d 128 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Collins
See also Hamling v. United States, 418 U.S. 87, 117 , 94 S.Ct. 2887, 2907 , 41 L.Ed.2d 590 (1974) (“A[n] indictment is sufficient if it, first, contains the elements of the offense charged and fairly informs a defendant of the charge against which he must defend, and, second, enables him to plead an acquittal or conviction in bar of future prosecution for the s c ha rging instrument “need only track the language of the statute *1031 and, if necessary to apprise the defendant ‘of the nature and accusation against him,’ [and] ... state time and place in approximate terms.”) quoting Uni…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Haddix
See, also, e.g., United States v. Bagaric (C.A.2, 1983), 706 F.2d 42 , certiorari denied (1983), 464 U.S. 840 , 104 S.Ct. 134 , 78 L.Ed.2d 128 ; United States v. Boylan (C.A.2, 1980), 620 F.2d 359 , certiorari denied (1980), 449 U.S. 833 , 101 S.Ct. 103 , 66 L.Ed.2d 38 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jack W. Glenham v. Cletus E. Austin Daniel Brink David L. Michie Murphy & Elgot June Powers Nancy Stroman, Jack W. Glenham v. Cletus E. Austin Daniel Brink Murphy & Elgot June Powers, and David L. Michie Nancy Stroman John Doe
Compare United States v. Bledsoe, 674 F.2d 647, 665 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1040 , 103 S.Ct. 456 , 74 L.Ed.2d 608 (1982), with United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42, 55 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 840 , 104 S.Ct. 133 , 78 L.Ed.2d 128 (1983); see United States v. Feldman, 853 F.2d 648, 659-60 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1030 , 109 S.Ct. 1164 , 103 L.Ed.2d 222 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Calvin MacKlin Jr. And Arthur Garfield Swain
Furthermore, the evidence must be viewed “in the light most favorable to the government,” United States v. Carson, 702 F.2d 351, 361 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1108 , 103 S.Ct. 2456 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1335 (1983), and we “must credit every inference that could have been drawn in the government’s favor.” United States v. Villegas, 899 F.2d 1324, 1339 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 535 , 112 L.Ed.2d 545 (1990); see also United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42, 64 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 840 , 104 S.Ct. 133 , 78 L.Ed.2d 128 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kourosh Bakhtiari
See, e.g., United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42, 64 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, *1059 464 U.S. 840 , 104 S.Ct. 133 , 78 L.Ed.2d 128 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William M. McCaleb
Hoffman, 806 F.2d at 707 ; see also United States v. Callahan, 702 F.2d 964, 965 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 840 , 104 S.Ct. 133 , 78 L.Ed.2d 128 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Beech-Nut Nutrition Corporation
Nonetheless, the participants' goals need not be congruent for a single conspiracy to exist, so long as their goals are not at " 'cross purposes.' " United States v. Heinemann, 801 F.2d at 92 & n. 1 (quoting United States v. Camiel, 519 F.Supp. 1238, 1244 (E.D.Pa.1981), aff'd, 689 F.2d 31 (3d Cir.1982)); see also United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42, 63 (2d Cir.1983) (coconspirators need not agree on details of conspiracy, where essential nature of plan is agreed on), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 840 , 104 S.Ct. 134 , 78 L.Ed.2d 128 (1983). 63 The matter of whether the evidence has established one …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Beech-Nut Nutrition Corp.
Nonetheless, the participants’ goals need not be congruent for a single conspiracy to exist, so long as their goals are not at “ ‘cross purposes.’ ” United States v. Heinemann, 801 F.2d at 92 & n. 1 (quoting United States v. Camiel, 519 F.Supp. 1238, 1244 (E.D.Pa.1981), aff'd, 689 F.2d 31 (3d Cir.1982)); see also United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42, 63 (2d Cir.1983) (coconspirators need not agree on details of conspiracy, where essential nature of plan is agreed on), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 840 , 104 S.Ct. 134 , 78 L.Ed.2d 128 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Enver Calbas
See Fed.R.Evid. 901; United States v. Sliker, 751 F.2d 477, 488, 497-99 (2d Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 470 U.S. 1058 , 105 S.Ct. 1772 , 84 L.Ed.2d 832 (1985); see, e.g., United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42, 67 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 840 , 104 S.Ct. 134 , 78 L.Ed.2d 128 (1983). 4 Calbas’s second argument, that there was no proof apart from the narcotics ledger to connect Calbas to Vrlaku or the transactions recorded therein to the conspiracy itself, is also unavailing.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Daniel Erwin Davis
See also United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42 , 63 n. 18 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 840 , 917, 104 S.Ct. 134 , 283, 78 L.Ed.2d 128, 261 (1983); United States v. Rone, 598 F.2d 564, 570-71 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Marvin Arnesto Crews, Jr.
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Callahan, 702 F.2d 964, 966 (11th Cir.) (threatening letter mailed to president-elect), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 840 , 104 S.Ct. 133 , 78 L.Ed.2d 128 (1983); United States v. Kirk, 528 F.2d 1057, 1063 (5th Cir.1976) (threat communicated to Secret Service); United States v. Rogers, 488 F.2d 512, 514 (5th Cir.1974) (threat against President made to local police), rev'd on other grounds, 422 U.S. 35 , 95 S.Ct. 2091 , 45 L.Ed.2d 1 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Santoro
Feb. 27, 1986); see United States v. Welch, 656 F.2d 1039, 1051 (5th Cir.1981) (“[A] RICO conspiracy count can provide the connexity between two otherwise unrelated conspiracies necessary to satisfy the requirements of Rule 8(b).”), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 915 , 102 S.Ct. 1767 , 72 L.Ed.2d 173 (1982); see also United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42, 69 (2d Cir.) (“Virtually by definition, the pattern of racketeering alleged in this [substantive RICO] case constituted a ‘series of acts or transactions’ sufficiently intertwined to permit a joint trial of all defendants.”) (citations om…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Harvey
v.
Anderson
v.
Anderson
No. 82-6914.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1983.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.