green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In Re The Beer Institute
The Act, now as then, requires "posting" of prices, whereby brewers and out-of-state beer importers "file a schedule stating the per-unit price that [they] will charge Connecticut wholesalers for [beer] products in the following month," id. at 276 (footnote omitted); see Conn.Gen.Stat.Ann.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Healy
The Act, now as then, requires “posting” of prices, whereby brewers and out-of-state beer importers “file a schedule stating the per-unit price that [they] will charge Connecticut wholesalers for [beer] products in the following month,” id. at 276 (footnote omitted); see Conn.Gen.Stat.Ann. § 30-63c (West 1975 & Supp.1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Geoffrey, Inc. v. Oklahoma Tax Commission
See Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax Bd., 463 U.S. 159 , 103 S.Ct. 2933 , 77 L.Ed.2d 545 (1983), rehearing denied, 464 U.S. 909 , 104 S.Ct. 265 , 78 L.Ed.2d 248 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Knoell v. Cerkvenik-Anderson Travel, Inc.
See United States Brewers Ass’n, Inc. v. Healy, 692 F.2d 275, 281 (2d Cir.1982), aff'd by 464 U.S. 909 , 104 S.Ct. 265 , 78 L.Ed.2d 248 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown-Forman Corp. v. Tennessee Alcoholic Beverage Commission
See United States Brewers Association, Inc. v. Healy, 692 F.2d 275, 283-84 (2d Cir.1982), affirmed without opinion, 464 U.S. 909 , 104 S.Ct. 265 , 78 L.Ed.2d 248 (1983): “Given the latitude allowed a state under the Twenty-first Amendment to regulate the sale of liquor within its own borders, the holding in Seagram might well validate ... a requirement simply that a brewer set its Connecticut prices at the lowest levels it chooses to set in the surrounding states, see 384 U.S. at 43-45 , 86 S.Ct. at 1260-1261 , leaving those out-of-state prices unregulated by Connecticut.
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown-Forman Corporation v. Tennessee Alcoholic Beverage Commission
See United States Brewers Association, Inc. v. Healy, 692 F.2d 275, 283-84 (2d Cir.1982), affirmed without opinion, 464 U.S. 909 , 104 S.Ct. 265 , 78 L.Ed.2d 248 (1983): 35 "Given the latitude allowed a state under the Twenty-first Amendment to regulate the sale of liquor within its own borders, the holding in Seagram might well validate ... a requirement simply that a brewer set its Connecticut prices at the lowest levels it chooses to set in the surrounding states, see 384 U.S. at 43-45 , 86 S.Ct. at 1260-1261 , leaving those out-of-state prices unregulated by Connecticut.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Brown
See United Brewers Ass’n v. Healy, 692 F.2d 275 (2d Cir.1982), aff'd without opinion, 464 S.Ct. 909 , 104 S.Ct. 265 , 78 L.Ed.2d 248 (1983); Plaintiffs’ Memorandum I at 31-33; Plaintiffs’ Memorandum II at 9-10.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Comcast Corp. & Subsidiaries v. Dep't of Revenue
Compare Northwestern Cement Co. v. Minn. , 358 U.S. 450 , 452, 79 S.Ct. 357 , 3 L.Ed.2d 421 (1959) (holding that neither the Commerce Clause nor the Due Process Clause of United States Constitution prevent states from taxing net income of an interstate business that is "earned from and fairly apportioned to business activities within the taxing State") with Container Corp. v. Franchise Tax Bd. , 463 U.S. 159 , 164, 103 S.Ct. 2933 , 77 L.Ed.2d 545 , reh'g den. , 464 U.S. 909 , 104 S.Ct. 265 , 78 L.Ed.2d 248 (1983) (explaining that both the Due Process and the Commerce Clauses prevent a state fr…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Arnold Industries, Inc.
v.
Stickler
v.
Stickler
No. 82-1959.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 13, 1983.
Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 53.