green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
12.1 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1988 ·
…impressions based on information gained in the proceedings are not grounds for disqualification in the absence of pervasive bias.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1953 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1953
1989
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 34 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Brennan
reckless disregard by a bank official of his bank's interest is sufficient to establish the requisite intent to defraud.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Brennan
_____________ ___ reckless disregard by a bank official of his bank's interest is sufficient to establish the requisite intent to defraud.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Matter of AB
congress is deemed to know the. . . judicial gloss given to certain language and thus adopts the existing interpretation unless it affirmatively acts to change the meaning.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
47 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1409, 47 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 38,260 Madison Anderson v. Walter Sheppard, Ford Motor Company
(2×)
impressions based on information gained in the proceedings are not grounds for disqualification in the absence of pervasive bias.
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Eneh
See Commonwealth v. Shuman, 391 Mass. 345, 355 (1984), quoting from United States v. Williams, 705 F.2d 603, 620 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1007 (1983) (remedy may be warranted where evidence depicts government conduct that “involved . . . pressure [or] persistent exploitation of personal weakness, as might occur if an agent preys upon an addict’s need for narcotics”).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bush
See United States v. Porter, 701 F.2d 1158 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1007 , 104 S.Ct. 524 , 78 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983). 11 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Marvin L. Warner v. Rex A. Zent, Warden
(2×)
See United States v. Fusaro, 708 F.2d 17, 23 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1007 , 104 S.Ct. 524 , 78 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Regina Kay Garrett
See United States v. Fusaro, 708 F.2d 17, 23 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1007 , 104 S.Ct. 524 , 78 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983) (where indictment failed to charge intent, but jury was instructed that intent is necessary, any error was harmless).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Tallahassee Associates, L.P.
See Fla. National Guard v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, 699 F.2d 1082, 1087 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, Federal Labor Relations Authority v. Fla. National Guard and Dept. of Defense, 464 U.S. 1007 , 104 S.Ct. 524 , 78 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Raul Enrique Penagaricano-Soler
“An indictment is generally sufficient if it sets forth the offense in the words of the statute including all the elements.” 4 United States v. Holmes, 632 *840 F.2d 167, 169 (1st Cir.1980); accord United States v. Fusaro, 708 F.2d 17, 23 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1007 , 104 S.Ct. 524 , 78 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Antonio Ulloa and Adolpho Transito
See United States v. Williams, 705 F.2d 603, 618 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1007 , 104 S.Ct. 524 , 78 L.Ed.2d 708 (1984); Myers, 692 F.2d at 849 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Roy
See United States v. Fusaro, 708 F.2d 17, 23 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1007 (1983); United States v. McLennan, 672 F.2d 239, 243 (1st Cir. 1982); United States v. Dixon, 596 F.2d 178, 180-81 (7th Cir. 1979); United States v. Purvis, 580 F.2d 853, 857 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 914 (1979); People v. Gutierrez, 105 Ill, App. 3d 1059, 1062, 433 N.E.2d 361, 365 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kenneth Robert Glenn, United States of America v. Manuel J. Benevides
See United States v. Fusaro, 708 F.2d 17, 22 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1007 , 104 S.Ct. 524 , 78 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983); cf. United States v. Jarabek, 726 F.2d 889, 904 (1st Cir.1984) (finding no error when, in light of the charge as a whole, the challenged instruction could have had no significant effect on the jury's verdict); United States v. Gibson, 726 F.2d 869, 874 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 960 , 104 S.Ct. 2174 , 80 L.Ed.2d 557 (1984) (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Glenn
See United States v. Fusaro, 708 F.2d 17, 22 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1007 , 104 S.Ct. 524 , 78 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983); cf. United States v. Jarabek, 726 F.2d 889, 904 (1st Cir.1984) (finding no error when, in light of the charge as a whole, the challenged instruction could have had no significant effect on the jury’s verdict); United States v. Gibson, 726 F.2d 869, 874 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 960 , 104 S.Ct. 2174 , 80 L.Ed.2d 557 (1984) (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gerena
See United States v. Porter, 701 F.2d 1158, 1165 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1007 , 104 S.Ct. 524 , 78 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983) (defendant found to lack standing with regard to airplane hangar, notwithstanding his regular use of it and the fact that he placed a lock on its entrance, where he was given no control over the hangar and it was used by others to store their property as well).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Nancy Peterson
See United States v. Williams, 529 F.Supp. 1085, 1106-07 (E.D.N.Y.1981) (Pratt, J.), aff'd, 705 F.2d 603, 624 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1007 , 104 S.Ct. 524 , 78 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
See United States v. Williams, 705 F.2d 603, 613 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1007 , 104 S.Ct. 524 , 78 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Engler
See United States v. Williams, 705 F.2d 603, 613 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1007 , 104 S.Ct. 524 , 78 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Antonio J. Mazza, United States of America v. Anthony Decologero
See United States v. Johnston, 784 F.2d 416, 426 (1st Cir.1986) (district court need not give defendant’s requested instructions as long as court’s own instructions are “correct and cover the issues”) (quoting United States v. Fusaro, 708 F.2d 17, 22 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1007 , 104 S.Ct. 524 , 78 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Panzardi-Alvarez
See United States v. Fusaro, 708 F.2d 17, 23 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1007 , 104 S.Ct. 524 , 78 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gregory Alberico v. The United States
(2×)
See Selective Service System v. Minnesota Public Service Research Group, 464 U.S. 1006 , 104 S.Ct. 522 , 78 L.Ed.2d 707 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Stickle
See, e.g., United States v. Williams, 705 F.2d 603, 623-24 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1007 , 104 S.Ct. 524 , 78 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983)(rejecting appellants’ duplicity claim where the indictment charged in a single count conspiracy to defraud the United States and to commit substantive offenses); United States v. Smith, 891 F.2d 703, 711-13 (9th Cir.1989)(indictment charging conspiracy to defraud the United States and to commit substantive offenses in a single count was not unconstitutionally duplicitous; two clauses of § 371 establish alternative means of commission rather than two dist…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sonya Evette Singleton
See, e.g., United States v. Williams, 705 F.2d 603, 622-23 (2d Cir.) (noting that the phrase “has consistently been given a broad meaning”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1007 , 104 S.Ct. 524 , 78 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Brigido Marmolejo, Jr. And Mario Salinas
(2×)
See United States v. Nilsen, 967 F.2d 539, 542 (11th Cir.1992) (stating that "Congress' frequent use of 'thing of value' in various criminal statutes has evolved the phrase into a term of art which the courts generally construe to envelope both tangibles and intangibles"), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 1034 , 113 S.Ct. 1856 , 123 L.Ed.2d 478 (1993); United States v. Picquet, 963 F.2d 54, 55 (5th Cir.) (holding that the term "anything of value" in 18 U.S.C. § 1029 (a)(2) should be interpreted broadly), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 902 , 113 S.Ct. 290 , 121 L.Ed.2d 215 (1992); United States v. Girard, 601 F…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Marmolejo
(2×)
See United States v. Nilsen, 967 F.2d 539, 542 (11th Cir.1992) (stating that “Congress’ frequent use of ‘thing of value’ in various criminal statutes has evolved the phrase into a term of art which the courts generally construe to envelope both tangibles and intangibles”), cer t. denied, 507 U.S. 1034 , 113 S.Ct. 1856 , 123 L.Ed.2d 478 (1993); United States v. Picquet, 963 F.2d 54, 55 (5th Cir.) (holding that the term “anything of value” in 18 U.S.C. § 1029 (a)(2) should be interpreted broadly), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 902 , 113 S.Ct. 290 , 121 L.Ed.2d 215 (1992); United States v…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Martinez
See also United States v. Fusaro, 708 F.2d 17, 25 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1007 (1983); United States v. Palow, 777 F.2d 52 , 55 n.1 (1st Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1052 (1986); United States v. Pacheco, 794 F.2d 7, 9 (1st Cir. 1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mongelli
See, e.g., United States v. Williams, 705 F.2d 603, 622-23 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1007 , 104 S.Ct. 524 , 78 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983); United States v. Girard, 601 F.2d 69, 71 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 , 100 S.Ct. 148 , 62 L.Ed.2d 96 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jacobson v. United States
(2×)
See also United States v. Williams, 705 F. 2d 603, 618, n. 9 (CA2), cert. denied, 464 U. S. 1007 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America, (88-5195), (88-5484) v. Billy York Walker, (88-5195), (88-5484)
See also United States v. Fusaro, 708 F.2d 17, 21 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1007 , 104 5.Ct. 524, 78 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983); United States v. Blackwood, 735 F.2d 142, 145-46 (4th Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gary v. United States
Significantly, “while the construction of a statute by the agency charged with administering it is entitled to deference, courts are nevertheless the final authorities on issues of statutory construction.” IRS v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, 111 F.2d 1174, 1176 (7th Cir. 1983); see also USDA v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, 691 F.2d 1242 , 1247 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1007 , 104 S.Ct. 523 , 78 L.Ed.2d 707 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thomas K. Doherty, United States of America v. Nelson E. Barner, United States of America v. Nicholas Salerno, United States of America v. Arthur J. Pino, United States of America v. Robert W. Clemente, Sr., United States of America v. John A. Deliere, United States of America v. Gerald W. Clemente, United States of America v. Frank Ray
See also United States v. Dynalectric Co., 859 F.2d 1559 (11th Cir.1988) (indictment charging scheme to defraud county and EPA of right to honest bidding process valid because it also charged that the scheme was intended to deprive them of money). 37 Of course, after excising the invalid portions of an indictment, the revised indictment must still, as the Constitution requires, describe the "offense ... with sufficient clarity to show a violation of law" and enable "the accused to know the nature and cause of the accusation against him and to plead an acquittal or conviction in bar of future p…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William J. Cintolo
See also United States v. Fusaro, 708 F.2d 17, 22 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1007 , 104 S.Ct. 524 , 78 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983); Morris, 700 F.2d at 433 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Peter R. Fink Karla S. Fink v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
(2×)
See, e.g., Florida National Guard v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, 699 F.2d 1082, 1087 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1007 , 104 S.Ct. 524 , 78 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gazie
See, e.g., United States v. Porter, 701 F.2d 1158, 1162-63 (6th Cir.) (refusal to allow defendants to examine surveillance equipment improper if defendants were deprived of fair trial), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1007 (1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bernal
v.
Fainter, Secretary of State of Texas
v.
Fainter, Secretary of State of Texas
No. 83-630.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 5, 1983.
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted.