green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.7 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Raymond P. Allard
the indictment must be '... a plain, concise and definite written statement of the essential facts constituting the offense charged.
discussed
Cited "see"
Staples v. United States
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Williams, 872 F. 2d 773 (CA6). [23] See, e. g., United States v. Gonzalez, 719 F. 2d 1516, 1522 (CA11 1983), cert. denied, 465 U. S. 1037 (1984); Morgan v. United States, 564 F. 2d 803, 805-806 (CA8 1977); United States v. Cowper, 503 F. 2d 130, 132-133 (CA6 1974), cert. denied, 420 U. S. 930 (1975); United States v. DeBartolo, 482 F. 2d 312, 316 (CA1 1973); United States v. Vasquez, 476 F. 2d 730, 732 (CA5), cert. denied, 414 U. S. 836 (1973), overruled by United States v. Anderson, 885 F. 2d 1248 (CA5 1989) (en banc).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Pernell Lawson
See United States v. Garrett, 720 F.2d 705, 710 (D.C.Cir.1983) ("where the correctness of the district court's decision depends upon a determination of fact which only a [fact-finder] could make but which has not been made, the appellate court cannot take the place of the [fact-finder]" (quoting SEC v. Chenery, 318 U.S. 80, 88 (1943)), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1037 (1984). 40 If the district court on remand were to find that Officer Nassar or Officer Croson recognized Lawson as the person who they reasonably believed had previously offered to sell them drugs, it could conclude that (in light of …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Neil Virgil Coyle, United States of America v. Mark Edward Swedzinski
See United States v. Moya, 721 F.2d 606, 609-10 (7th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1037 , 104 S.Ct. 1312 , 79 L.Ed.2d 709 (1984), and United States v. Bell, 678 F.2d 547, 549 (5th Cir. Unit B 1982), aff'd, 462 U.S. 356 , 103 S.Ct. 2398 , 76 L.Ed.2d 638 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Neil Virgil Coyle, United States of America v. Mark Edward Swedzinski
See United States v. Moya, 721 F.2d 606, 609-10 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1037 , 104 S.Ct. 1312 , 79 L.Ed.2d 709 (1984), and United States v. Bell, 678 F.2d 547, 549 (5th Cir. Unit B 1982), aff’d, 462 U.S. 356 , 103 S.Ct. 2398 , 76 L.Ed.2d 638 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Andy Juman v. Ellen Kreitzberg
See United States v. Garrett, 720 F.2d 705, 710 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1037 (1984) (decision of lower court must be affirmed if result is correct, although lower court relied upon wrong ground or gave a wrong reason).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas Savage
See United States v. Garrett, 720 F.2d 705, 710 (D.C.Cir.1983) (appellate court may affirm decision even if trial court relied upon deficient ground), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1037 , 104 S.Ct. 1311 , 79 L.Ed.2d 708 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Romanosky
See United States v. Baker, 722 F.2d 343, 349 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1037 , 104 S.Ct. 1312 , 79 L.Ed.2d 709 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
William J. Harrell, Patricia Parker, and Karen Schamm v. United States of America, Ltjg Atkin
See United States v. Everett, 719 F.2d 1119 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1037 , 104 S.Ct. 1311 , 79 L.Ed.2d 709 (1984) (intent not necessary to establish probable cause to arrest; passing of counterfeit note itself provides sufficient probable cause to arrest); see also 21 U.S. C. § 955 (it is unlawful to possess a controlled substance aboard any vessel entering or departing the United States or the customs territory of the United States).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Felton
See United States v. Garrett, 720 F.2d 705, 707-08 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1037 , 104 S.Ct. 1311 , 79 L.Ed.2d 708 (1984); United States v. Lopez-Espindola, 632 F.2d 107, 109 (9th Cir.1980). 121 Thus whether the question of the effect of Cox's absence is resolved on the theory that the longstanding severance motion should have been granted, and therefore, Cox's absence cannot be attributed to his co-defendants under section 3161(h)(7), or on the theory that Cox was not absent or unavailable within the meaning of section 3161(h)(3)(B), the result is the same.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Felton
See United States v. Garrett, 720 F.2d 705, 707-08 (D.C.Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1037 , 104 S.Ct. 1311 , 79 L.Ed.2d 708 (1984); United States v. Lopez-Espindola, 632 F.2d 107, 109 (9th Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Cong Duc Le
See also United States v. Baker, 722 F.2d 343, 345 , 347 n.8, 349 (7th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1037 (1984) (Federal agent testified to witness’s selection of defendant’s photographs even though witness testified that she could not recall identifying defendant; allowing prior identification as substantive evidence did not violate confrontation clause or rule 801 [d] [1] [C]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Richards
Appellant, ironically, has it right when, in defense of our “same intent” language, he points to cases that have instead used the term shared intent, see, e.g., Nye & Nissen v. United States, 336 U.S. 613, 620 , 69 S.Ct. 766, 770 , 93 L.Ed. 919 (1949); United States v. Martiarena, 955 F.2d 363, 366 (5th Cir.1992); see also United States v. Garrett, 720 F.2d 705, 713 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1037 , 104 S.Ct. 1311 , 79 L.Ed.2d 708 (1984); United States v. Raper, 676 F.2d 841 , 850-51 & n. 1 (D.C.Cir.1982), which suggests that the intent of the aider and abettor must be shown, i…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Tyrone N. Walker
Appellant, ironically, has it right when, in defense of our “same intent” language, he points to cases that have instead used the term shared intent, see, e.g., Nye & Nissen v. United States, 336 U.S. 613, 620 , 69 S.Ct. 766, 770 , 93 L.Ed. 919 (1949); United States v. Martiarena, 955 F.2d 363, 366 (5th Cir.1992); see also United States v. Garrett, 720 F.2d 705, 713 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1037 , 104 S.Ct. 1311 , 79 L.Ed.2d 708 (1984); United States v. Raper, 676 F.2d 841 , 850-51 & n. 1 (D.C.Cir.1982), which suggests that the intent of the aider and abettor must be shown, i…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Stephen Goot
The district court, however, must avoid not exercising “any discretion at all in imposing the sentence.” United States v. Griffin, 827 F.2d 1108, 1118 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 909 , 108 S.Ct. 1085 , 99 L.Ed.2d 243 (1988). “[WJhere the facts appearing in the record point convincingly to the conclusion that the district court has, without any justification, arbitrarily singled out a minor defendant for the imposition of a more severe sentence than that imposed upon the co-defendants, this court will not hesitate to correct the disparity.” United States v. Wiley, 278 F.2d 50…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
ca1 1989
See, e.g., United States v. Sedlak, 720 F.2d 715, 721 (1st Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1037 , 104 S.Ct. 1312 , 79 L.Ed.2d 709 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bay State Ambulance & Hospital Rental Service, Inc.
See, e.g., United States v. Sedlak, 720 F.2d 715, 721 (1st Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1037 , 104 S.Ct. 1312 , 79 L.Ed.2d 709 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Joseph Owens
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Baker, 722 F.2d 343, 348-49 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1037 , 104 S.Ct. 1312 , 79 L.Ed.2d 709 (1984); Vogel v. Percy, 691 F.2d 843, 846 (7th Cir.1982); United States v. Rogers, 549 F.2d 490, 494-96 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 918 , 97 S.Ct. 2182 , 53 L.Ed.2d 229 (1977)
Garrett
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 83-6067.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 21, 1984.
Cited by 47 opinions | Published
Citer courts: First Circuit (1)
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.