green
Positive treatment
3.4 score
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Bunker Ramo-Eltra Corp. v. Fairchild Industries, Inc.
See Texas International Airlines v. National Airlines, Inc., 714 F.2d 533, 536 (5th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1052 , 104 S.Ct. 1326 , 79 L.Ed.2d 721 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sterman v. Ferro Corporation
See Texas International Airlines v. National Airlines, Inc., 714 F.2d 533 (5th Cir.1983) cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1052 , 104 S.Ct. 1326 , 79 L.Ed.2d 721 (1984) 5 Plaintiffs cited precedent is not convincing since the cases relied upon address factual situations wherein the profiting parties attempted to avoid the repayment of short swing profits imposed by Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C.
cited
Cited "see"
Sterman v. Ferro Corp.
See Texas International Airlines v. National Airlines, Inc., 714 F.2d 533 (5th Cir.1983) cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1052 , 104 S.Ct. 1326 , 79 L.Ed.2d 721 (1984). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Synalloy Corp. v. Gray
See, e.g., Texas International Airlines v. National Airlines, Inc., 714 F.2d 533, 542 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1052 , 104 S.Ct. 1326 , 79 L.Ed.2d 721 (1984) (affirming exclusion from damages under § 16(b) the "expenses truly incidental to the transaction — brokerage commissions and transfer taxes"); Reece Corp. v. Walco National Corp., 565 F.Supp. 158, 166 (S.D.N.Y.1981) (allowing deduction from § 16(b) damages for brokerage commission, but disallowing legal expenses). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
David Colan, and Unocal Corporation v. Mesa Petroleum Co., David Colan, and Unocal Corporation v. Mesa Petroleum Co.
See also Texas Int’l Airlines v. National Airlines, Inc., 714 F.2d 533, 540 (5th Cir.1983) (“[T]he volitional character of the exchange is sufficient reason to trigger applicability of the language of section 16(b).”), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1052 , 104 S.Ct. 1326 , 79 L.Ed.2d 721 (1984); Gund v. First Florida Banks, Inc., 726 F.2d 682, 686 (11th Cir.1984) (“The vast majority of cases in which the pragmatic approach has been followed involve involuntary transactions which are triggered by a corporate reorganization....”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
David Colan, and Unocal Corporation v. Mesa Petroleum Co., David Colan, and Unocal Corporation v. Mesa Petroleum Co.
See also Texas Int’l Airlines v. National Airlines, Inc., 714 F.2d 533, 540 (5th Cir.1983) (“[T]he volitional character of the exchange is sufficient reason to trigger applicability of the language of section 16(b).”), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1052 , 104 S.Ct. 1326 , 79 L.Ed.2d 721 (1984); Gund v. First Florida Banks, Inc., 726 F.2d 682, 686 (11th Cir.1984) (“The vast majority of cases in which the pragmatic approach has been followed involve involuntary transactions which are triggered by a corporate reorganization....”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Texas International Airlines, Inc.
v.
National Airlines, Inc.
v.
National Airlines, Inc.
No. 83-932.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 21, 1984.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of petitioners in No. 83-1111, Heublein, Inc. v. General Cinema Corp., to consolidate with this petition denied. Certiorari denied.