green
Positive treatment
2.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
DiSalle v. P.G. Publishing Co.
(2×)
But see Braig v. Field Communications, 310 Pa.Super. 569, 587 , 456 A.2d 1366, 1376 (1983), allocatur denied, *532 cert. denied, 466 U.S. 970 , 104 S.Ct. 2341 , 80 L.Ed.2d 816 (1984) (court implicitly rejected the neutral reportage doctrine by reversing summary judgment in favor of defendant television station on grounds that jury could find actual malice in rebroadcasting accusations of another where there was evidence that station general manager may have had "serious doubts" about truth of the underlying statements).
cited
Cited "but see"
United States v. Joseph Silvano, Jr., United States of America v. William P. McNeill
But see United States v. Piccolo, 723 F.2d 1234 (6th Cir.1983) (in banc), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 970 , 104 S.Ct. 2342 , 80 L.Ed.2d 817 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Raul Enrique Penagaricano-Soler
See abo United States v. Piccolo, 723 F.2d 1234, 1239 (6th Cir.1983) (en banc), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 970 , 104 S.Ct. 2342 , 80 L.Ed.2d 817 (1984); United States v. Davis, 679 F.2d 845, 851 (11th Cir.1982), ce rt. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony R. Colombo and Joseph Colombo, Jr.
(2×)
See United States v. Mitchell, 723 F.2d 1040, 1049-50 (1st Cir.1983) (while “this type of prejudice is not to be brushed off lightly,” it is not by itself enough to support a claim of denial of the right to a speedy trial), cf. United States v. Ciammitti, 720 F.2d 927, 930-31 (6th Cir.1983) (similar claim insufficient in Fed.R.Crim.P. 48(b) context), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 970 , 104 S.Ct. 2342 , 80 L.Ed.2d 816 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Barker
See United States v. Piccolo, 723 F.2d 1234 , 1240 and n. 1 (6th Cir.1983) (en banc), cert. denied, —U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 2342 , 80 L.Ed.2d 817 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Geronimo Gonzalez
Consideration of these facts leads to but one conclusion: there was no sixth amendment violation. 7 Rule 48(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure also guards against 'unnecessary delay in presenting the charge to a grand jury or in filing any information against a defendant who has been held to answer to the district court, or . . . unnecessary delay in bringing a defendant to trial.' It does not apply to this pre-indictment delay because after the complaint was dismissed, Gonzalez was 'legally and constitutionally in the same posture as though no charges had been made,' MacDonald, 456…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert W. Davenport Thomas Edward Greer Kenneth Charles Ford
We reviewed this failure to instruct for plain error, and declined to find reversible error because the jury instructions sufficiently informed the jury that it could only convict the defendant for a “conspiracy alleged in the indictment of which he was a part.” Id.; see also United States v. Piccolo, 723 F.2d 1234, 1240-41 (6th Cir.1983) (en banc), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 970 , 104 S.Ct. 2342 , 80 L.Ed.2d 817 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Graves
v.
Lexington Herald-Leader Co.
v.
Lexington Herald-Leader Co.
No. 83-619.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 14, 1984.
Published
Sup. Ct. Ky. Certiorari denied.