green
Positive treatment
5.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. Nuckolls
But see United States v. Gomez-Soto, 723 F.2d 649 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 977 , 104 S.Ct. 2360 , 80 L.Ed.2d 831 (1984) (holding that the warrant allowing the seizure of papers, including currency, evidencing failure to file currency transaction reports as required by law was unconstitutionally vague because it lacked objective guidelines to aid determination of what may be seized.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Stephen Kow Helen Kim Noi Soo and Hong Tho Luu
See United States v. Gomez-Soto, 723 F.2d 649, 654 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 977 , 104 S.Ct. 2360 , 80 L.Ed.2d 831 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Larry Lowe
Accord United States v. Gomez-Soto, 723 F.2d 649, 655 (9th Cir.) (quoted with approval in Lucas, 932 F.2d at 1216 ), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 977 , 104 S.Ct. 2360 , 80 L.Ed.2d 831 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Lavers
(2×)
See United States v. Gomez-Soto, 723 F.2d 649, 654-55 (9th Cir.) (using similar reasoning in holding search and seizure of a microcassette proper), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 977 , 104 S.Ct. 2360 , 80 L.Ed.2d 831 (1984); cf. United States v. Falcon, 766 F.2d 1469, 1476 (10th Cir.1985) ("once the agents were justified in seizing the tape, no additional authority was necessary for the agents to play the tape"); United States v. Bonfiglio, 713 F.2d 932, 937 (2d Cir.1983) (same). [4] For the reasons stated above, we conclude that the warrant was valid and the search was not illegally extended.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William Riley, Norman Burnett, Jeffrey Sizemore, Vincent Mazza
(2×)
See United States v. Gomez-Soto, 723 F.2d 649, 654 (9th Cir.) (“Since the DEA sought articles it claims are typically found in the possession of narcotics traffickers, the warrant could have named or described those particular articles.” Because “the government could have drafted a warrant to get what it wanted without authorizing an exploratory general search,” the overbroad warrant was invalid.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 977 , 104 S.Ct. 2360 , 80 L.Ed.2d 831 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Victor Montano Disla
See United States v. Gomez-Soto, 723 F.2d 649, 654 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 977 , 104 S.Ct. 2360 , 80 L.Ed.2d 831 (1984); W.R.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jude R. Hayes
(2×)
The touchstone of the particularity requirement is whether the warrant ensures that "[a]s to what is to be taken, nothing is left to the discretion of the officer executing the warrant." Marron v. United States, 275 U.S. 192, 196 , 48 S.Ct. 74, 76 , 72 L.Ed. 231 (1927); Andresen v. Maryland, 427 U.S. 463, 480 , 96 S.Ct. 2737, 2748 , 49 L.Ed.2d 627 (1976); see United States v. Gomez-Soto, 723 F.2d 649, 653 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 977 , 104 S.Ct. 2360 80 L.Ed.2d 831 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Gall
(2×)
See In re D.F.L., 931 P.2d 448, 451-52 (Colo.1997); People v. Press, 633 P.2d 489, 492-93 (Colo.App.1981) (upholding officer's removal and subsequent search of defendant's safe at another location where safe was reasonably believed to contain items sought pursuant to a valid search warrant); see also United States v. Gomez-Soto, 723 F.2d 649, 654-55 (9th Cir.1984) (upholding seizure of briefcase where warrant authorized seizure of books, papers, diaries, and receipts), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 977 , 104 S.Ct. 2360 , 80 L.Ed.2d 831 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Calisto, Samuel J.
See, e.g., United States v. McDonald, 723 F.2d 1288, 1293 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied 466 U.S. 977 , 104 S.Ct. 2360 , 80 L.Ed.2d 831 (1984); United States v. Southard, 700 F.2d 1, 10 (1st Cir.1983), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Vastola
Christine, 687 F.2d at 754 (“Materials seized under the authority of those parts of the warrant struck for invalidity must be suppressed, but the *1273 court need not suppress materials seized pursuant to valid portions of the warrant.”); see also United States v. Gomez-Soto, 723 F.2d 649, 654 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 977 , 104 S.Ct. 2360 , 80 L.Ed.2d 831 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ralph H. Washington
Id. at 78 ; see also United States v. Gomez-Soto, 723 F.2d 649, 653-54 (9th Cir.) (invalidating portion of a warrant calling for seizure of papers, including currency, evidencing failures to file currency transaction reports as required by Title 31 U.S.C. because it “lacks objective guidelines to aid the determination of what may or may not be seized and is thus unconstitutionally vague”), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 977 , 104 S.Ct. 2360 , 80 L.Ed.2d 831 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ralph H. Washington
Id. at 78 ; see also United States v. Gomez-Soto, 723 F.2d 649, 653-54 (9th Cir.) (invalidating portion of a warrant calling for seizure of papers, including currency, evidencing failures to file currency transaction reports as required by Title 31 U.S.C. because it “lacks objective guidelines to aid the determination of what may or may not be seized and. is thus unconstitutionally vague”), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 2360 , 80 L.Ed.2d 831 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nos. 85-1085, 85-1086
Cardwell, 680 F.2d at 78 ; see also United States v. Gomez-Soto, 723 F.2d 649, 654 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 2360 , 80 L.Ed.2d 831 (1984). 51 In our case, however, to the extent that the government sought evidence of misbranding involving drugs not listed in items 1-14, with a few minor exceptions, the government did not have information allowing it to specify the precise names of other potentially misbranded drugs.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Storage Spaces Designated Nos. \8\" & \"49\""
Cardwell, 680 F.2d at 78 ; see also United States v. Gomez-Soto, 723 F.2d 649, 654 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 2360 , 80 L.Ed.2d 831 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Harold S. McCLINTOCK, Defendant-Appellant
See, e.g., United States v. Gomez-Soto, 723 F.2d 649, 652-54 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 2360 , 80 L.Ed.2d 831 (1984); United States v. Cardwell, 680 F.2d 75, 77-78 (9th Cir.1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Woods
v.
Pennsylvania
v.
Pennsylvania
No. 83-6499.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 14, 1984.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Super. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.