green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.5 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Recognition Equipment Inc.
the government need not establish that there existed a formal agreement to conspire; circumstantial evidence and reasonable inferences drawn therefrom concerning the relationship of the parties, their overt acts, and the totality of their conduct may serve as proof.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Henry Louis Griffin
See United States v. Redwine, 715 F.2d 315, 320-21 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1216 , 104 S.Ct. 2661 , 81 L.Ed.2d 367 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles P. Streich
See United States v. Redwine, 715 F.2d 315, 319 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 2661 , 81 L.Ed.2d 367 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Manuel Herrera
See United States v. Redwine, 715 F.2d 315, 320-321 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 2661 , 81 L.Ed.2d 367 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Joseph Marren and Michael Russo
“The government need not establish that there existed a formal agreement to conspire; circumstantial evidence and reasonable inferences drawn therefrom concerning the relationship of the parties, their overt acts, and the totality of their conduct may serve as proof.” Hooks, 848 F.2d at 792 ; See also United States v. Redwine, 715 F.2d 315, 320 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1216 , 104 S.Ct. 2661 , 81 L.Ed.2d 367 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Maria Urrego De Soto, Gustavo Chaverra Cardona, and Ruth Urrego Chaverra
Pinkerton has been repeatedly interpreted by this court “to mean that each conspirator may be ‘liable for overt acts of every other conspirator done in furtherance of the conspiracy.’ ” United States v. Gironda, 758 F.2d 1201, 1211 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1004 , 106 S.Ct. 523 , 88 L.Ed.2d 456 (1985) (quoting United States v. Read, 658 F.2d 1225, 1230 (7th Cir.1981)); see also United States v. Redwine, 715 F.2d 315, 322 (7th Cir.1983) (“it is settled that a proven conspirator is responsible for the substantive offenses based on the overt acts of his fellow conspirators as l…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Joseph Gironda, John Heckens, John Speiss, and John Balzano
(2×)
See also United States v. Redwine, 715 F.2d 315, 322 (7th Cir.1983) ("a proven conspirator is responsible for the substantive offenses based on the overt acts of his fellow conspirators as long as those acts were done in furtherance or as a natural consequence of the conspiracy"), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 2661 , 81 L.Ed.2d 367 (1984). 1 In accordance with this court's established construction of the Pinkerton doctrine, we held in United States v. Galiffa, 734 F.2d 306 (7th Cir.1984), that the district court did not err in giving an instruction on Pinkerton liability similar to th…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Charles F.
v.
New York
v.
New York
No. 83-6243.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 29, 1984.
Published
Citer courts: District of Columbia (1)
Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.