green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
B & F Trawlers, Inc. And International Bank, N.A. v. United States
(2×)
But see United States v. Varig Airlines, 467 U.S. 797 , 815 n. 12, 104 S.Ct. 2755 , 2765 n. 12, 81 L.Ed.2d 660 , reh’g denied, 468 U.S. 1226 , 105 S.Ct. 26 , 82 L.Ed.2d 919 (1984) (Court’s analysis rendered unnecessary its consideration of governmental assertion that FAA aircraft certification was a core governmental function not actionable under the FTCA).
discussed
Cited "see"
Casines v. Murchek
(2×)
See Davis v. Scherer, 468 U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 3012 , 82 L.Ed.2d 139 , reh’g denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 26 , 82 L.Ed.2d 919 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Elana Casines, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Paul Murchek, Etc., Eugene Walden, Iii, Etc., William Abbey, Etc., Phillip Ware, Etc., and Louie L. Wainwright, Elana Casines, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Paul Murchek, Etc., Eugene Walden, Iii, Etc., William Abbey, Etc., Phillip Ware, Etc., and Louie L. Wainwright
(2×)
See Davis v. Scherer, 468 U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 3012 , 82 L.Ed.2d 139 , reh'g denied, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 26 , 82 L.Ed.2d 919 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Etchegoinberry v. United States
(2×)
Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555-56 , 127 S.Ct. 1955 , 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007) (citing Smerkiewicz v. Sorema N.A., 534 U.S. 506 , 508 n. 1, 122 S.Ct. 992 , 152 L.Ed.2d 1 (2002))); see also Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236 , 94 S.Ct. 1683 , 40 L.Ed.2d 90 (1974), overruled on other grounds sub. nom., Davis v. Scherer, 468 U.S. 183 , 104 S.Ct. 3012 , 82 L.Ed.2d 139 , reh’g denied, 468 U.S. 1226 , 105 S.Ct. 26 , 82 L.Ed.2d 919 (1984); United Pac.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jack Hidahl and Cindy Hidahl, Individually and as Next Friends on Behalf of Tore Hidahl and Tad Hidahl v. Gilpin County Department of Social Services, Susie Lala, Individually and as an Employee of the Gilpin County Department of Social Services, Jane Felix, Individually and as an Employee of the Gilpin County Department of Social Services, Mary Mason, Individually and as an Employee of the Gilpin County Department of Social Services, Gilpin County Sheriff's Office, John Bayne, Individually and as Deputy Sheriff for the Gilpin County Sheriff's Office, the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Gilpin and the Board of Social Services for the County of Gilpin v. The City of Central, Third Party
(2×)
See also Davis v. Scherer, 468 U.S. 183 , 194 n. 12, 104 S.Ct. 3012 , 3019 n. 12, 82 L.Ed.2d 139 (1984), reh'g denied, 468 U.S. 1226 , 105 S.Ct. 26 , 82 L.Ed.2d 919 (1984), (stating that although "Harlow was a suit against federal, not state, officials.... the same qualified immunity rules apply in suits against state officers under Sec. 1983") 4 A constitutional or statutory right is "clearly established" if "[t]he contours of the right [are] ... sufficiently clear that a reasonable official would understand that what he is doing violates that right." (emphasis added).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hidahl v. Gilpin County Department of Social Services
(2×)
See also Davis v. Scherer, 468 U.S. 183 , 194 n. 12, 104 S.Ct. 3012 , 3019 n. 12, 82 L.Ed.2d 139 (1984), reh'g denied, 468 U.S. 1226 , 105 S.Ct. 26 , 82 L.Ed.2d 919 (1984), (stating that although “Harlow was a suit against federal, not state, officials_the same qualified immunity rules apply in suits against state officers under § 1983”). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Herman Louis Dimartini v. Lynn Jay Ferrin, Special Agent, Federal Bureau of Investigation
(2×)
Immunity attaches if the official’s conduct is objectively reasonable “as measured by reference to clearly established law.” Id.; see also Davis v. Scherer, 468 U.S. 183, 191 , 104 S.Ct. 3012, 3017 , 82 L.Ed.2d 139 reh’g denied, 468 U.S. 1226 , 105 S.Ct. 26 , 82 L.Ed.2d 919 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
South Carolina
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. A-37 (84-138).
Supreme Court of the United States.
Aug 16, 1984.
Published
D. C. D. C. Application for stay, addressed to Justice Powell and referred to the Court, denied.