green
Positive treatment
6.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Senmed, Inc. And Ethicon, Inc. v. Richard-Allan Medical Industries, Inc.
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
Ct. 220, 83 L.Ed.2d 150 , 224 USPQ 520 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Todd v. Hawk
Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a); see Boileau v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 730 F.2d 929, 938 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 221 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Fiber-Lite Corp. v. Molded Acoustical Products, Inc. (In Re Molded Acoustical Products, Inc.)
See Boileau v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 730 F.2d 929, 939 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 221 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Hayes Microcomputer Products, Inc. Patent Litigation. Ven-Tel, Inc. v. Hayes Microcomputer Products, Inc., Defendant/cross-Appellant. Hayes Microcomputer Products, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Ven-Tel, Inc.
Fact findings reviewed under the substantial evidence standard require affirmance unless appellant shows that no reasonable juror could have reached such a result. 5 Id.; see Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Co., 727 F.2d 1506, 1512-13 , 220 USPQ 929, 936 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 220 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ven-Tel, Inc. v. Hayes Microcomputer Products, Inc.
Fact findings reviewed under the substantial evidence standard require affirmance unless appellant shows that no reasonable juror could have reached such a result. 5 Id.; see Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Co., 727 F.2d 1506, 1512-13 , 220 USPQ 929, 936 (Fed.Cir.), ce rt. denied, 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 220 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Read Corp. v. Portec, Inc.
Randall, Inc. v. AFA Protective Sys., 516 F.Supp. 1122, 1124 (E.D.Pa.1981) (citations omitted), aff'd, 688 F.2d 820 (3d Cir.1982); accord *1082 Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Co., 579 F.Supp. 353, 358 (E.D.Pa.1983), aff'd, 727 F.2d 1506 (Fed.Cir.) cert. denied 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 220 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Capeletti Bros. v. Metropolitan Dade County
See South Florida Chapter of the Associated General Contractors of America, Inc. v. Metropolitan Dade County, Florida, 552 F.Supp. 909 (S.D.Fla.1982), aff'd in part, rev’d in part, 723 F.2d 846 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 220 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Lindemann Maschinenfabrik Gmbh v. American Hoist & Derrick Company, Harris Press & Shear Division and Commercial Metals Company
See Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Co., 727 F.2d 1506, 1519 , 220 USPQ 929, 941 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 220 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984) (in lost profits context: “One who fails to submit evidence in support of a position cannot be heard on appeal to complain that the trial court failed to find facts upholding that position”); Devex Corp. v. General Motors Corp., 667 F.2d 347, 363 , 212 USPQ 643, 657 (3rd Cir.1981) (affirming award of zero damages for lack of evidence and saying: “The statute [ 35 U.S.C. § 284 ] requires the award of a reasonable royalty, but…
discussed
Cited "see"
Altenberg v. Frankford Trust Co. (In Re Railroad Dynamics, Inc.)
(2×)
See 579 F.Supp. 353 (E.D.Pa. 1983), affd, 727 F.2d 1506 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 220 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984). 3.
discussed
Cited "see"
Devex Corporation v. General Motors Corporation
See Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Co., 727 F.2d 1506 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 220 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984). 8 Plaintiff filed its 1986 appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
cited
Cited "see"
Devex Corp. v. General Motors Corp.
See Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Co., 727 F.2d 1506 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 220 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Donald L. Snellman D/B/A Norfin v. Ricoh Company Ltd.
See Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Co., 727 F.2d 1506, 1511 , 220 USPQ 929, 934 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 220 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Balmer
See Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Co., 727 F.2d 1506 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 220 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kloster Speedsteel Ab v. Crucible Inc.
On this record, Stora has shown no "basis on which this court could engage in the normally inappropriate process of substituting a contrary credibility determination for that of the district court." Windsurfing International, Inc. v. AMF Inc., 782 F.2d 995, 999 , 228 USPQ 562, 565 (Fed.Cir.1986); see Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Co., 727 F.2d 1506, 1514 , 220 USPQ 929, 937 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 220 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984). 41 Moreover, the district court met Stora's contentions head-on, rejecting, for example, its argument that Reen did not have to warn aga…
cited
Cited "see"
A. Stucki Co. v. Schwam
See Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Company, 579 F.Supp. 353 (E.D.Pa.1983), aff 'd, 727 F.2d 1506 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 220 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kloster Speedsteel AB v. Crucible Inc.
On this record, Stora has shown no “basis on which this court could engage in the normally inappropriate process of substituting a contrary credibility determination for that of the district court.” Windsurfing International, Inc. v. AMF Inc., 782 F.2d 995, 999 , 228 USPQ 562, 565 (Fed.Cir.1986); see Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Co., 727 F.2d 1506, 1514 , 220 USPQ 929, 937 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 220 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Darda Inc. USA v. Majorette Toys (U.S.) Inc.
See, Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Co., 727 F.2d 1506 , 220 USPQ 929 (Fed.Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 220 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984); Hycor Corp. v. Schlueter Co., 740 F.2d 1529 , 222 USPQ 553 (Fed.Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Goodwall Construction Co. v. Beers Construction Co.
Dataline Corp. v. Micro Technologies, Inc., 813 F.2d 1196, 1200 (Fed.Cir.1987) (citing Perkin-Elmer Corp. v. Computer Vision Corp., 732 F.2d 888, 893 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 857 , 105 S.Ct. 187 , 83 L.Ed.2d 120 (1984)); see also Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Co., 727 F.2d 1506 , 1512 *1050 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 220 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984). “ ‘Substantial evidence’ is such relevant evidence from the record taken as a whole as might be accepted by a reasonable mind as adequate to support the finding under review.” Fonar Corp. v. Johnson & Jo…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Biodex Corporation v. Loredan Biomedical, Inc.
Corp., 833 F.2d 1352 , 1356 n. 2 (9th Cir.1987) (no review of denial of directed verdict); cf. Kopczynski v. The Jacqueline, 742 F.2d 555, 560 (9th Cir.1984) (question of direct review of denial of directed verdict not passed on), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1136 , 105 S.Ct. 2677 , 86 L.Ed.2d 696 (1985); see also Borger v. Yamaha Int’l Corp., 625 F.2d 390, 394-95 (2d Cir.1980) ("Borger’s contends that Yamaha’s failure to move within ten days for judgment n. o. v. as required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 50(b) precludes it from seeking appellate review of the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
George W. Jurgens and Margaret M. Jurgens v. Timothy McKasy D/B/A Tonka Marketing and Cbk, Ltd.
See, e.g., Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Co., 727 F.2d 1506, 1518 , 220 USPQ 929, 940 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 220 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sun Studs, Inc. v. Ata Equipment Leasing, Inc., Applied Theory, Inc. And U.S. Natural Resources, Inc., Defendants/cross-Appellants
See also, e.g., Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Co., 727 F.2d 1506, 1512 , 220 USPQ 929, 935 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 220 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984) (whether motion denied or granted, review follows the path trod by the district court); 5A Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 50.07[2] (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. United States Gypsum
See, e.g., Boileau v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., et al., 730 F.2d 929 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 221 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984); Howze v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 750 F.2d 1208, 1212 (3d Cir.1984); Heyl & Patterson Int’l v. F.D.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
HB Fuller Co. v. National Starch and Chemical Corp.
See, e.g., Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Co., 727 F.2d 1506, 1518 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 220 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Arizona Western College District Governing Board
v.
Cooper
v.
Cooper
No. 83-1879.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1984.
Consideration, Took.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.