green
Positive treatment
1.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Paulsen v. State Bar of Texas
Washington Legal Found. v. Massachusetts Bar Found., 795 F.Supp. 50 , 53 (D.Mass.1992), aff'd, 993 F.2d 962, 976 (1st Cir.1993); In re Massachusetts Bar Ass’n, 395 Mass. 1 , 478 N.E.2d 715, 718-19 (1985); In re New Hampshire Bar Ass’n, 122 N.H. 971 , 453 A.2d 1258, 1261 (1982); In re Minnesota State Bar Ass’n, 332 N.W.2d 151, 158 (Minn.1982); In re Interest on Trust Accounts, 402 So.2d 389, 396 (Fla.1981); but see Carroll v. State Bar, 166 Cal.App.3d 1193 , 213 Cal.Rptr. 305, 312 (1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 848 , 106 S.Ct. 142 , 88 L.Ed.2d 118 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cone v. the Florida Bar
See Carroll v. State Bar of California, 166 Cal.App.3d 1193 , 213 Cal.Rptr. 305 (upholding constitutionality of California’s mandatory IOTA program), cert. denied sub nom Chapman v. State Bar of California, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 142 , 88 L.Ed.2d 118 (1985). 6 In her contention that she has a substantive right to IOTA proceeds, the plaintiff relies most strongly upon a somewhat similar fact situation in Webb’s Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc. v. Beckwith, 449 U.S. 155 , 101 S.Ct. 446 , 66 L.Ed.2d 358 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Washington Legal Found. v. Mass. Bar Found.
See, e.g., Carroll v. State Bar of Cal., 166 Cal.App.3d 1193 , 213 Cal.Rptr. 305 , cert. denied, 474 U.S. 848 , 106 S.Ct. 142 , 88 L.Ed.2d 118 (1985); In re Interest on Lawyers' Trust, 283 Ark. 252 , 675 S.W.2d 355 (1984); Matter of Interest on Lawyers' Trust Accounts, 672 P.2d 406 (Utah 1983); Petition of N.H.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Washington Legal Foundation v. Massachusetts Bar Foundation
See, e.g., Carroll v. State Bar of Cal., 166 Cal.App.3d 1193 , 213 Cal.Rptr. 305 , cert. denied, 474 U.S. 848 , 106 S.Ct. 142 , 88 L.Ed.2d 118 (1985); In re Interest on Lawyers’ Trust, 283 Ark. 252 , 675 S.W.2d 355 (1984); Matter of Interest on Lawyers’ Trust Accounts, 672 P.2d 406 (Utah 1983); Petition of N.H.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matter of Indiana State Bar Ass'n
Compare In Re Interest on Lawyers' Trust Accounts (1984), 283 Ark. 252 , 675 S.W.2d 355 (client consent not an element of IOLTA program but participating attorneys and law firms must inform clients of participation in program), modified (1985), 286 Ark. 64 , 689 S.W.2d 352 (notice to client on same day as client's money is first deposited, subsequent deposits of client's money may be made without repeating notice), modified further (1986), 289 Ark. 595 , 709 S.W.2d 400 (notice to clients sufficient if conspicuously posted in law office), modified further (1987), 293 Ark. 511 , 738 S.W.2d 803 (…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Indiana State Bar Association's Petition to Authorize a Program Governing Interest on Lawyers' Trust Accounts
Compare In Re Interest on Lawyers' Trust Accounts (1984), 283 Ark. 252 , 675 S.W.2d 355 (client consent not an element of IOLTA program but participating attorneys and law firms must inform clients of participation in program), modified (1985), 286 Ark. 64 , 689 S.W.2d 352 (notice to client on same day as client's money is first deposited, subsequent deposits of client's money may be made without repeating notice), modified further (1986), 289 Ark. 595 , 709 S.W.2d 400 (notice to clients sufficient if conspicuously posted in law office), modified further (1987), 293 Ark. 511 , 738 S.W.2d 803 (…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lundy
v.
Union Carbide Corp.
v.
Union Carbide Corp.
No. 85-174.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1985.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.